All posts by Henry Thoureau

Sexual Sins

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today I’m going to be explaining a few things about why my Bible videos are taking longer and longer to produce.

I obviously understand things about the Bible that no one else does. But honestly, I only really know the basics. I think that it would be wonderful to have a deep understanding of each and every detail that is recorded in the Bible, but I really don’t think that we are going to be able to do that until after Christ returns.

When I first started to produce Bible videos words came to me quite easily. I had been going to church all of my life, and paying careful attention to everything that my pastor, priest, or elder was saying, and all the while I was reading my Bible. So I had an incredible database of knowledge to fall back on.

Before becoming what I am today, I spent 18 years as a Catholic, 9 years attending the meetings of different denominations of the protestant religion, and 13 years as a Jehovah’s Witness.

Being personally involved with so many versions of Christianity, I was made very much aware of the doctrinal conflicts that existed, but after examining all of the evidence for myself, I felt adequately qualified to declare which denominational teachings of which religions best represented what was actually recorded in the Bible.

Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, all of the more significant stories that I was hearing from those religious leaders were lies. And when I would look up the verses to confirm what they were saying, the Bibles that I was using were mistranslated just enough to give credence to the lies that those religious leaders were speaking. In other words, I was not teaching truth. I was simply teaching the lies that best represented those mistranslated Bible verses.

Fortunately for me, I started to discover that verses from our English translations of the Bible often contradict those very same verses as found in other English translations of the Bible.

I was smart enough to realize that both renderings of such verses could not be correct. At least one had to be wrong, and if one could be wrong, perhaps both were wrong.

Up until that time, I had never imagined that anyone would be wicked enough to intentionally mistranslate the Bible. I initially believed that perhaps the mistranslations were the result of honest mistakes.

The videos that I originally produced were about 25% truth, combined with about 75% Church doctrine. Today, I am embarrassed anytime that I think about it. The churches themselves probably teach about 10% truth, meaning that what I was teaching back then was not all that much more accurate than what I had been taught.

You probably don’t know what I am talking about because you have never seen any of those videos. I produced them back before I became SustenanceNCovering, on a YouTube Channel that I no longer use.

Even though those old videos weren’t very accurate, the small amount of truth that they contained was enough to get me in trouble. Most of the people that watched them became filled with rage, because even though most so called “Christians” love to hear stories about the LORD Jesus Christ, they are not at all interested in truth.

2Timothy 4:3,4 puts it this way:

“The time is coming when people will not be able to endure healthy teachings, but seek out doctrines that support their lusts, surrounding themselves with teachers who say what their ears crave to hear. They will refuse to listen to truth, in their desperate search for fables.”

In any case, by the time that I started this channel, I had already begun to stumble upon many Bible verses that had been mistranslated in support of the doctrinal beliefs of the religions that I had been involved with.

I am not trying to make excuses, but, it is a fact that I am much more patient with people who believe in religious doctrines, as a result of believing in similar doctrines myself, at one time. I honestly think that it was divine direction that led me to believe in such things as a means of teaching me to be patient with my listeners today.

In any case, the experience caused me to be suspicious of everything, and as a result, my accuracy has increased dramatically. Since starting this YouTube Channel, I rarely say anything, based solely on English translations of the Bible. I’m rather obsessive about checking everything that I research against the original manuscripts.

If you are one of the people that has noticed that it is taking me longer and longer to produce videos, you may be wondering why.

The embarrassment that I experience whenever I discover that I have been teaching things that are not true, has made me extremely cautious about speaking before having all of the facts. And the longer that I continue doing this, the more false teachings I discover in my own beliefs.

I may seem filled with confidence from an outsider’s point of view, but from where I am standing there are many things that I am not confident about at all. Remember. I only know the basics. Understanding the details is a struggle. Even for me. Perhaps, especially for me.

Sometimes when I am writing a single paragraph I can spend several days researching each ancient Hebrew or Greek line of text involved. Any time that I think I have figured out every trick in the book that the Empire has used to manipulate our Bibles, I surprise myself by stumbling upon some previously undiscovered treachery.

To this day, I am still posting videos, completely satisfied that I have thought of everything, only to discover days, weeks, or months later that I got something wrong. In fact as time goes on, I am certain that I will find out that something about this video is wrong as well.

Before I reveal the purpose of this video, I want you to know that what I am about to say is going to seem fairly inconsequential, and boring, at first. But if you hang in there to the end, you are going to hear some things that are shocking. I am certain, that if you are a long time subscriber to my videos you are not going to want to miss what I am about to reveal.

In the early days when I felt like I knew everything, my beliefs about sexual sins were pretty much the same as everybody else’ beliefs on this subject. I rarely spoke of it because I knew deep down inside that I was sexually attracted to women, and I felt that if I spoke out against lust, I would be a hypocrite.

Once I began discovering just how many lies the Churches were teaching, I began to investigate everything. But,initially I never even thought about the wickedness of sex.

Some doctrines are so universally ingrained into every nook and cranny of our society, that it’s difficult to even recognize them as doctrines. God’s hatred of sexual activity is clearly and undeniably spelled out in our English translations of the Bible.

Or is it?

I soon discovered that the majority of the false teachings that I uncovered, were things that had never felt right to me in the first place. My instincts seemingly were always more in line with what was recorded in the Bible, than Church doctrine. I have since heard similar feelings expressed by my subscribers, leading me to believe that I am not alone.

As a natural man with natural sexual desires, I always felt bad, anytime that I came across a Bible verse that seemed to condemn people for having such desires.

Eventually the time came for me to pick up my Bible and start reading it once again. It would be the eighth time that I had done so.

As I started to come across the verses that made me uncomfortable, instead of quickly reading through them, I researched them using Hebrew and Greek reference material to confirm that the words used by the translators were true to the original language text.

I soon realized that none of the original language words that are translated as lust in our English Bibles, seemed to be related to the kinds of emotion that a man or woman would have towards members of the opposite sex.

I was beginning to sense that I may have stumbled on to another false doctrinal teaching, but this time what I was reading was so different from what I had always been taught, that my mind simply could not accept what I was discovering at face value.

I didn’t even have to look into any of the original language text where the word lust appeared, to determine that the word lust in most cases, as used in the Bible, could not possibly be about anything sexual.

Each verse that I came across while researching lust, was very obviously about bizarre, perverted, cravings, for unnatural things that God hates, such as power, prestige, and wealth. But rarely about anything that could be associated with natural human sexual behavior.

I was starting to feel much better about myself. I personally have never craved power over others. As a young person I use to dream about being rich or prestigious, but by the time that I started to understand what these verses were about, those cravings had long since past. Unlike the terrible struggle that I had been engaged in to overcome religion’s version of lust for members of the opposite sex, overcoming God’s version of lust for power, prestige, and wealth wasn’t going to be an issue at all.

As is to be expected, those who love religious rules will twist the scriptures any way that they can as a means of supporting those rules. In this video I am not even going to try to address each and every verse that the sex hating theologians like to promote, but I will speak a little about one of their favorites.

In the sermon on the mount recorded in Matthew chapter 5, Jesus taught about the superiority of truth over religion. What Jesus said that day is understood by many to be more profound than anything that had ever been taught before or since. One of the things that he said at verse 28 is supposedly this:

“Everyone who looks at a woman lustfuly has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”

Not only is this translation severely flawed, but it is taken out of context. As quoted in the Churches, this verse seems to be about the wickedness of any sexual desires that any man might have for any woman. But as originally recorded in the sermon on the mount, this verse is very obviously about a very specific form of perverted sexual behavior. Verse 27 and 28 together say this:

“You have heard that it was said, You shall not commit adultery. But I am telling you that everyone who looks at a woman lustfuly has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”

Obviously verse 28 is about applying verse 27.

The definition of adultery is not the same as the definition of sex. And looking at a woman lustfully according to the original Greek text, is not about admiring the the physical beauty of a woman. The original Greek word at this verse is epithymesai Strong’s G1937.

Epithymesai means planning out an attempt at actually having sex. A better translation of Matthew 5:27,28 would be:

“You have heard it said, that you shall not have sex with someone else’ woman. But I say to you that everyone who has the intention of doing so, is already guilty of adultery in his heart.” In other words, a failure to actually engage in sex with someone else’ girlfriend does not lessen the sin of the intention.

In our modern culture, we only apply the concept of adultery to sex with people who are legally married to someone else. But Jesus was very obviously quoting Exodus 20:14, which was writtten at a time when men still lived by tribal law. Rules regarding sexual behavior at that time were nothing like the rules that we live by today.

Love is real. It always has been. Having love certified by the state, does not make love more real.

Jesus was also making reference to Exodus 20:17:

“You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male servant, or his female servant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.”

In other words, it is wrong to desire that which belongs to someone else. Any attempts at stealing away somone who is involved in any kind of romantic relationship, would be adultery according to The Ten Commandments.

Jesus’ admonition not to attempt to take away somone’s sex partner, has nothing to do with natural sexual desires. Being sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex is an instinctive behavior, intentionally placed in man by God. Greed is not an instinctive behavior. Wicked intentions can only come from an unclean spirit. Those filled with God’s Holy Spirit, automatically reject any desires that would lead to causing harm.

Many of the words that we currently associate with human sexuality, as used in the Bible, don’t even seem to be about humans. When I would read verses such as Exodus 34:16, I found it difficult to understand the concept of having sex with gods.

“And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods.”

Even the translators can’t agree on how to render these verses. Some render the Hebrew word zanah Strong’s H2181 as whoring, just like the King James version, which I just quoted. But others render it as worship. The official definition according to most reference material is fornication.

The English definition of these two English words are not the same. The words whoring, and worship are not normally interchangeable.

If I were to say that zanah, means basket, there would be no one that could question what I say unless they were willing to question every rendering of every English Bible, as well.

In English fornication is defined as any sex act between two people that are not legally married. From the verses where the word fornication is found in our Bibles, I could see that our understanding of fornication could not possibly be what the original writers were trying to communicate.

As it turns out, I eventually decided that the word zanah had to mean sex with people that were demon possessed, or sex with people who worshiped false gods. And I was content that even if my definition was not 100% accurate, it would still be more in line with how such words seem to be used in the Bible.

As time went on, I would carefully look up all of the words found in the surrounding text, anytime that I came across any word that ended up in our English Bibles as something sexual in nature.

I eventually realized that my definition of zanah could not possibly be correct in every verse where that word was used. At some point, I felt as if the word zanah must have been used to describe actual sex acts between humans and wicked angels. I think that at one time I actually said in one of my earlier videos that fornication was any sex act between a human and any other species, including angels.

At the time I was certain that humans and angels were not members of the same species.

Knowing that I had produced quite a few videos that were based on my previous understanding, I went back and took a serious look at what I had posted to YouTube to make a decision as to whether to take them all down and start over from scratch, or leave them up. I did not feel comfortable knowing that there were videos of me available to the public that were not accurate. Of course all of those videos are still up so you probably already know that I decided to leave them.

Even though I was not comfortable with the idea of people learning things from me that were not accurate, I knew that if I took them down all that my subscribers would have available to them was the vile filth produced by religious people.

I’m really picky about my videos. Obviously how I appear to the public, is going to be more important to me than it is to my listeners. But another factor that I had to take into consideration is that I had a whole lot more that I needed to share with people, and stopping my life to redo my older videos would very obviously keep me from making new videos.

Something else that was a really big consideration is the amount of work required to make or remake a video. The technology available to me meant that a single video could take up to a full 40 hour week to tape and edit. Not to mention the months that I sometimes dedicate to writing the scripts for those videos.

But recently I discovered something else about the words related to sexual sins, and this time it totally changed everything. And not in a small way. I was studying Galatians Chapter 5 and discovered a very easy to discern pattern that seemingly solved the mystery.

All of the information in Galatians Chapter 5 is about distinguishing between good people and bad people. All of the character traits used to describe good people are just what we would expect to see in anyone trying to live by God’s natural law.

All of the character traits used to describe bad people are what we would expect to see in social climbers. Those willing to do anything, to anybody, in order to get ahead.

The Greek word that gets translated as fornication in our English Bibles, porneia Strong’s G4202 simply means selling oneself. Whether sexually or otherwise. In this verse, porneia could only mean using sex or love, as a tool for improving ones social, political, or economic status. After checking every verse where the word porneia is used, I could see that I finally had a definition that would logically fit in, at every verse where it is used.

Since porneia is always translated as fornication in every English Bible that I have checked, I really feel as if the Hebrew word zanah probably means the same thing, as the Greek word porneia. As time goes on, I expect to get a better understanding of those words and hopefully figure out if in fact they can be defined in the same way.

The Bible as it has come down to us was not written in English. The most ancient copies that still exists are in Hebrew and Greek. Hebrew being the language of the Old Testament, and Greek being the language of the New Testament.

The reason that I am telling you this is, so that you will understand that figuring out the definition of porneia, does not necessarily reveal the definition of zanah. When Jesus was alive, the Greek empire had taken over the task of producing Bibles in Greek, just as the Roman Empire eventually took on the task of producing Bibles in Latin, and just as the British Empire eventually took on the task of producing Bibles in English.

Since the Jewish citizens of the Greek Empire had transitioned into speaking Greek long before Jesus was born, those Jews needed a Bible that was in Greek.

There are religions that teach that Jesus spoke Hebrew, but no evidence exists that Jesus knew how to speak any language other than the version of Greek that was spoken in Judea during the first century.

According to legend, Ptolemy II chose 6 men from each of the 12 tribes of Israel, to translate the Hebrew part of the Bible into Greek. There are some serious flaws in this story, but in any case, these men supposedly spoke both languages fluently. And yet, they seemingly never rendered the Hebrew word zanah as the Greek word porniea. Although both words supposedly mean the same thing.

The point that I am trying to make is that many words that are found in our Bibles having to do with human sexuality, may or may not be related to sex at all.

A car salesman who acts as if he is your best friend just so that he can sell you a car, or a politician who acts as if he is concerned for your well being, just to get your vote, would be considered fornicators, according to the definition of the Greek word porneia, and perhaps according to the definition of the Hebrew word zanah.

It cannot be denied that many occurrences of the word porneia in the Bible seemingly do involve sex. Since sex was created by God to be one of the most intense ways for two people to express their love for one another, sex by it’s very nature would be one of the most powerful tools that a wicked person could use to manipulate potential victims.

Porneia is the reason that so many old,unattractive, politicians and celebrities, are married to young, sexy, beautiful, healthy, men, and women. The wicked are masters at using love and sex as weapons.

The courts of most lands recognize this skill as a legitimate means of earning an income, and hence, the judicial systems of most countries richly reward such vile behavior. Earth wide many wealthy, powerful, people, have gotten where they are simply by having sexual relations with wealthy, powerful people.

Even a marriage between two relatively unimportant people would be considered fornication if one or both of the people involved got married for any reason other than pure love.

Using the law to lock someone into a legally binding contract in order to insure that a man or woman will fulfill their roll, as a caregiver, or provider, in a two person relationship, would qualify as selling oneself, which is the actual definition of the word that is rendered as fornication in the Bible.

That being the case, it must be acknowledged that sexual relations between two people that are legally married, in nearly every case, would qualify as fornication.

And although by definition, the English word fornication means sexual relations between people that are not married, according to the Bible definition of zanah and porneia sexual relations between two people that are not married would rarely qualify as fornication.

I am certain that my current understanding of the Bible definition of fornication, will noticeably improve the accuracy of every video that I produce from this time forward.

Right now. If you are a long time subscriber, you are probably trying to remember all of the videos that I have produced about sexual sins, and can’t think of any. That is because I am usually smart enough not to go into great detail about things that I don’t fully understand.

But sometimes we can be talking about something without even realizing it.

Genesis 6:1-4 says:

“When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose.”

“The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.”

Anybody who reads these verses will automatically recognize that the sons of God were angels that came down and impregnated human women, bringing about the birth of hybrid creatures called Nephilm. Some Bibles call them giants.

The reason that everybody knows this is because most of us are familiar with the verses and have heard this explanation from some source outside of the Bible.

But, if we were to read these verses in their original ancient language forms without anyone to tell us what they mean, we would only be able to conclude that there were people killing things from the very beginning of human history.

The word nephilim in ancient Hebrew simply means those who cause living things to fall. And nowhere in the Bible are we told that the sons of God are angels. The only two named sons of God in the entire Bible are Adam and Jesus. Both of these men were fleshly beings when they were called sons of God.

The words that are translated as “daughters of men” would more accurately be translated as “women built from men” a perfect description of Eve.

Since the phrases, daughters of men and sons of God are both very obviously plural, meaning more than one, it would make much more sense to understand these verses as saying,

“Destroyers were on the earth back when the men and women that God made, started having children.”

The Bible says that God made Adam and Eve, but nowhere does it say that they were the only two humans ever made by God. We simply accept that they were, based on the doctrinal teaching that they were. There are absolutely no verses in any original Hebrew or Greek Bible book, saying that God only made one man and one woman.

According to our English translations of the Bible, Acts 17:26 says:

“And he made out of one man every nation of man to dwell on the entire surface of the Earth”

A word for word literal translation would actually sound more like this:

“From out of one was made every ethnicity of human that lives on the face of the Earth.”

The point being that the word man is not to be found after the word one, in any original language text. Apparently someone somewhere felt that the word man belonged, but there really isn’t any scriptural support for this assumption.

At the time, Paul was making a very specific point to the people of Athens. If you read the entire passage, from verse 16, all the way to verse 31, you will see that Paul was addressing the number of idols surrounding the Areopagus.

Everything that Paul said to those people related to the number of gods being worshiped by the Greeks. The point that he was making had nothing to do with the number of men that god created, but the number of gods that created man.

As originally recorded in Greek, Acts 17:26 would be more accurately translated as:

“Out of one God was made every ethnicity of human that lives on the face of the Earth.”

What I am about to tell you may not agree with what you currently believe, but according to Genesis 6:1-4, as originally recorded thousands of years ago, these verses are not about illegal sexual relations between humans and angels at all.

A better understanding of these verses would probably sound more like this:

“When humans began to multiply on the face of the land, and women were born out of the sons of God, they saw that the women built out of men, were attractive. And they took any women that they chose.”

“Killers were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the women built out of men, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.”

If these sons of God, like Adam were fleshly male humans that God created, to populate the Earth, then there would be no sin involved when they began to populate the Earth.

Likewise if the women built of man were like Eve created from the ribs of those sons of God, there would be no sin involved in their mating with those sons of God.

A person might deduce that since Eve was created for Adam, that it would not be right for her to mate with any of the other sons of God. But after reading all of the verses involved, breaking them down into the original Hebrew, and studying them in depth, I cannot find anything to indicate that God was at all displeased with their sexual behavior.

In fact, Genesis 6:1-4 has very obviously been included in our Bibles, by God, to make one point, and one point only. To contrast the natural, acceptable behavior of creating life, with the unnatural, unacceptable behavior of destroying life. Nothing else.

Please don’t think that I have been holding back. I like you did not understand what a son of God was until about 6 months ago. I, like you, thought that a son of God was some different kind of being.

When I first came to realize what these verses actually said, it was very disturbing to me. The belief that the nephilim were the result of fornication had been the foundation of much of what I understood about the Bible. Many of the videos that I have produced were created before I understood what is and what is not fornication.

After years of abuse at the hands of civilization’s defenders, I have developed a rather good understanding of what to expect form the mindless religious drones that call themselves citizens.

From reading the Bible I have figured out that how people act today is no different from how they acted at any other time in human history.

The irrational behavior that people engage in today reminds me of the behavior of those that lived in Jesus’ day.

As Jesus was traveling from town to town, miraculously healing the sick, restoring sight to the blind, and resurrecting the dead, his detractors were always present to scold him for performing such miracles on an official day of rest, or for not washing his hands before eating, or for not participating in the Jewish fasts, or for any number of other nonsensical religious ritualistic behaviors.

The point that I am trying to make is that as carefully as the Jews were at watching every move that Jesus made, and picking apart every inconsequential thing that he did, they were never actually able to disprove any of his teachings.

As time goes on, everything that I have been teaching about the restoration of our solar system is going to start taking place. I fully expect to start getting a lot of attention from the supporters of Satan’s current empire.

If they accuse me of not washing my hands before meals, or not resting on weekends or of not participating in any of the nonsensical religious rituals, of our current social order, such as pledging allegiance to flags, or watching the Superbowl, or going in debt at Christmas time, I won’t get upset. But I really don’t want them to be able to accuse me of teaching contradictory things.

I am really not comfortable having videos out there that clearly state that the Nephilim were the hybrid offspring of Angels and humans, knowing that I am now making videos about how the Nephilim were just people that killed things.

Figuring all of this out has dramatically increased my current understanding of the Bible in ways that are exciting. Many of the verses about family relationships are starting to have much deeper meaning for me.

For now, you are simply going to have to trust me when I tell you that our old understanding of Genesis 6:1-4 has stood in the way of our gaining an accurate understanding of many other basic Bible truths. But, from this moment on, we are going to be learning things that would have previously been nothing more than unsolvable mysteries.

Just as an example, a question that has been posted on my YouTube channel quite regularly by those wishing to discredit me, my God, or The Bible, has been, “Where did Cain get his wife?”

The Bible based religions have been addressing this question for hundreds of years using nothing more than philosophical reasoning that could never be proven from the Bible. Unlike the cults of Judaism and Christianity, we can answer that question by simply quoting Genesis 6:1-4, which clearly states that Adam and Eve, were not the only son of God, and woman built out of a man.

Nowhere in the Bible does it say that sex was involved in mankind’s fall from grace. Genesis 3:14,15 clearly states that mankind’s fall was caused by a lie. God told Eve that eating from the tree of knowledge of good and bad would have dire consequences. Which as it turns out was a true teaching.

Satan told Eve that eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and bad would be beneficial, which as it turns out was very obviously a lie.

Eve did not decide what to do based on logic, but instead based on her own selfishness. She listened to the teachings of God and the teachings of the serpent, and without even thinking about which teaching seemed reasonable, selfishly chose what she felt would best benefit her personally, without taking into consideration how her actions would affect her God, or anyone else.

To this day everything bad that happens in this world is the result of lying and selfishness. Just like Eve who demanded her right to be like God, Every citizen of the Empire demands the same rights as granted to them by the constitutions of the lands in which they reside.

Eve thought that she was freeing herself, by rejecting God’s law. When in reality all that she was doing was enslaving herself to Satan’s law.

It is a common theme for people who are enslaved, to falsely believe that they are free. Around the world the citizens of nations that are obviously nothing more than very large slave labor camps, have special days set aside specifically for celebrating their false freedom. To make their freedom seem more realistic, many of the slaves are allowed to take a day off from work, in order to celebrate their imaginary freedom.

The serpent promised Eve that she could be like god. And despite the fact that in the course of the conversation, he accused the creator of being a liar, she submitted herself to Satan’s authority.

Any reasonable person would have instantly recognized Satan’s words as nonsense. But at the time, Eve had never experienced being lied to. As 1Timothy 2:14 says, “The Woman was deceived.”

For many living today, it might seem reasonable to believe that sexual intercourse with the wicked one, might be an effective way to introduce wicked character traits into the human family, but nowhere in the Bible are we told that wickedness has to be inherited biologically. There are too many verses that speak of wickedness as if it is a choice.

Satan was wicked. Are we to imagine that Satan had a wicked biological father. Cain was wicked, but the Bible clearly states that Cain’s father was Adam.

It could be said that Eve was wicked because she listened to the serpent, but there is no denying that Eve was created from Adam’s rib. Adam was a son of God. Biologically Eve’s father would have been God as well.

While on Earth Jesus accused the leaders of the Jewish religion of being wicked. In fact he called them children of the serpents. Are we to believe that the Pharisees that Jesus was addressing were the biological offspring of a hybrid mating between reptiles and humans? Or perhaps that somehow the pharisees who were members of the Jewish race, had descended directly from Satan, in some kind of way that was different from all other Jews.

According to many verses, righteous people are said to be filled with the Holy Spirit, or filled with a clean spirit. Wicked people are often said to be filled with an unclean spirit, or unclean spirits.

1Corinthians 15:44 says: “If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.” Perhaps as time goes on we will gain a better understanding of this verse. For now all that we need to know is that our natural body can only come to us biologically through our natural parents. How we get our spiritual body may have nothing to do with biological reproduction at all.

It cannot be denied that as we are reading our Bibles, it often seems as if a person’s spirit is an inherited trait, just like characteristics such as skin color or blood type.

In the Bible we are told that Satan was a destroyer of life. We are also told that Cain was a destroyer of life. In ancient Hebrew, the definition of Nephilim would be “destroyer of life”.

1John 3:12 clearly states that Cain belonged to the wicked one, and the language used is what we might expect if Satan was the biological father of Cain. In fact there is a religious belief that is gaining in popularity that Satan was Cain’s father.

The Bible does not specifically explain how Satan was able to instill into Cain a spirit similar to his own. It would be presumptuous for us to think that something biological had to be involved. After all Genesis 4:1 clearly says that Adam was the father of Cain.

In our Bibles there is no denying the obvious references to sex, conception, and birth, that are associated with wickedness. Our world today is ruled by members of a single elite family that seemingly has ruled over humanity ever since the time of the Pharaohs.

That does not mean that only members of the ruling family, have the capacity for wickedness.

In one of the oldest books ever written at Job 15:35 it says:

“They conceive trouble and give birth to evil; their womb prepares deceit.”

The words conceive, birth, and womb, used here are translated properly, and yet this verse, in context, does not seem to be about sexual reproduction.

Isaiah 59:4 says:

“No one calls for justice; no one pleads his case honestly. They rely on empty pleas; they tell lies; they conceive mischief and give birth to iniquity.”

And James 1:13-15 says:

“Let no one say when he is tempted, I am being tempted by God, for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one. But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. Then desire when it has conceived, gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death.”

All of these verses are about wicked thoughts, and intentions, and yet the language used is similar to the language used to describe human reproduction. The Bible repeatedly refers to this time of trouble that we are experiencing as the time of Birth Pains.(Matthew 24:8, Isaiah 66:9)

According to the verses associating wickedness with sexual reproduction, Satan may have simply told Cain about the benefits that could be had from murdering his brother. Cain may have simply admired Satan, and imitated his example. The Bible doesn’t even say anything about Satan and Cain ever interacting. It is possible that Cain’s mother Eve passed along the wickedness that she received from Satan when she entered into his covenant and ate fruit from The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

The seed within Satan that led to his rebellion seemingly was nothing more than his craving to be worshiped. The same could be said of Eve, Cain, or any other person that believes that it is his or her right to create and inflict upon others, any system of rules, separate and distinct from God’s natural law.

This pattern is spoken of at Ezekiel 28:15:

“You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, till unrighteousness was found in you.”

In our day it is easy enough to observe that the wicked are nothing like the righteous. No righteous person would ever dream of world domination, and yet our world is currently run by men and women who have never dreamed of anything else.

As time goes on, I am certain that we are going to learn much more related to this subject. As I work through the process of correcting the information that I have posted in the past, civilization will be exposed for what it is, even more than it has been exposed already.

According to God’s law, we are to honor our father and mother. In this world many of us have parents that are our enemies, and enemies of our God as well. For many of us, the current social order makes obedience to God’s Ten Commandments impossible to keep. As Jesus himself said, our enemies will be those of our own household.

What I am about to say may sound impossible, but many of our seemingly bad parents may one day be resurrected as much nicer people. When and if that happens, honoring our parents may become much easier. The same could be said about our original parents. Regardless of what we may think about the actions of Adam and Eve, the day may come when we can similarly honor them. In fact as time goes on, I will be sharing information directly from the Bible that clearly states as much.

No sex would be involved in Satan becoming the founding father of civilization. Which he did. Since Cain became the world’s first city builder, he might have honored Satan as his founding father in much the same way that patriots today, honor the founding fathers of their individual nations.

When Jesus was alive he clearly warned against calling any man father. Obviously, Jesus’ warning was not against referring to our biological fathers as such, but against bestowing such an honor on men who are not our biological fathers. Regardless of what such men might be the fathers of.

As time has gone on, I have often thought of remaking all of my best videos. As the quality of my audio and video equipment has improved, the quality of the audio and video of my older material bothers me. This isn’t the first time that I have mentioned my desire to redo much of my older material.

Back when I first started thinking about redoing my older videos I could not in good conciseness shut down my channel for an extended time just to slightly improve on what was already there.

However, if I was to do so now, the quality would not just improve slightly. I am certain that if I were to produce new videos based on those old videos they would be so much better, that they would not even be recognizable to people that have seen the originals. In effect, any remakes of older material would be mostly new material.

Now that we have discovered the true meaning of words such as zanah and porneia, we no longer have to feel guilty about our natural sexual desires.

Knowing that many Bible verses seemingly about sex, conception, and birth have absolutely nothing to do with biological reproduction, we can stop wasting our efforts on the study of Bible genealogy, and start dedicating ourselves to figuring out the true meaning of such verses.

At 1Timothy 1:3-7 Paul said that his listeners were not to waste their time, trying to figure out fables and genealogies, but to instead devote themselves to learning about important things such as love. His reasoning was that those who study such things are only trying to be seen as great teachers of the law, when in fact, they have no idea what they are talking about.

I spent the first 40 years of my life desperately seeking someone that I could believe in. Someone that could lead me to learning the truth about God, the universe, and myself.

When I found out that the Catholic Church was teaching lies, I was emotionally damaged. The same thing happened when I found out that the Protestants were teaching lies. And the final organized religion that I was involved in, Jehovah’s Witnesses, was the worse, because once I realized that I had been lied to again, I felt as if I had nowhere to go.

If you have had an experience similar to mine, you may feel somewhat disappointment over finding out that some of what I have been teaching has been very inaccurate. Hopefully you are spiritual enough to understand the difference between what the churches have spent the last 6,000 years consistently doing intentionally, and what I do on occasion by mistake.

I said earlier in this video, that as time goes on, I am certain that I will find out that something about this video is wrong as well. As most of you know, I usually send out the transcripts of these videos to a small handpicked group that I trust to look them over, make corrections, and send them back before I post them to YouTube. This particular script was sent out to BMXION. The man that runs our second YouTube Channel.

He only found one discrepancy. At Genesis 6:2,4 the phrase “sons of God” in Hebrew is “ben elohiym” not “ben el”, in other word it was not the sons of God that came into the daughters of men, but the sons of the gods. Plural.

At this point, I still haven’t figured out why so many verses in our Bibles use the word gods, plural, as opposed to the word god singular. As time goes on, I may discover that the use of the word elohiym Strong’s H430 will require me to make further changes to the things that I teach.

When asked by the crowds how to pray, Jesus said that we were to pray to our father singular, so it is obvious that we are not to be praying to the gods plural.

We can be certain of one thing. The explanation given by the Churches is definitely wrong. And very likely intentionally wrong by design.

The hurt that I experienced at the hands of Christianity, was not based on the fact that were filling my head with inaccurate information, but on the fact that they were intentionally leading me away from learning the truth about my God, singular, and the gods, plural.

Please continue to pay attention to this channel. You are about to learn some very exciting things.

If you don’t want to survive…… Don’t listen to me.

Melchizedek Part 3 Revealing The True Identity Of Melchizedek

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is the next installment in the Melchizedek Video Series. In today’s video, I will be revealing, just who Melchizedek is.

In part 1 of this series, I explained in no uncertain terms that according to the Bible Abram was born 60 years earlier than the Churches claim, and that when he was born, all of his ancestors were still alive, including Noah, the builder of the ark.

Since religious people hate truth and love lies, there is no possibility that any of them will use this information to increase their understanding of God’s word The Bible. It is likely that they will simply continue doing as they always have, treating this essential Bible truth as inconsequential.

I can promise you that it is not.

Over time, Civilization’s religions have created a fiction that each and every one of us has come to accept as truth, without even being aware of it. We have all come to accept that the Bible is a collection of, for the most part, unrelated stories designed to teach us basic life lessons. When in fact, that is not the case at all.

The Bible is a single unified story about mankind’s struggle to overcome God’s natural law, and at the risk of sounding like I am repeating myself, the core theme of the Bible is “The war between God’s Kingdom, and Satan’s Empire.” Many of the Bible’s most precious truths have been missed because of how The Empire’s religious leaders present the story.

We can learn a great deal about how the Churches have been able to accomplish this as we unravel the mystery surrounding the identity of Melchizedek. Once you become aware of this one simple technique that the churches use to confuse mankind, you will be better equipped to recognize other lies that you may currently be unaware of.

Many events take place in The Book of Genesis. Just a few examples from Chapter 5 to 20 would be, the birth of the Nephilim associated with the ruining of the Earth. God bringing a global deluge. Noah getting drunk and sinning. Nimrod building a tower and the languages of mankind becoming confused. Abram being called out of Ur to travel to the promised land. A great war beginning with the death of a man named Peleg. And Abram’s meeting with the rightful king referred to in our Bibles as Melchizedek.

To the average person these incidents are called Bible stories (plural). Breaking up the Bible into individual unrelated events is not without purpose. Separating these parts of the Bible into individual stories is much more insidious than someone might think.

As children, we are exposed to Bible stories on TV, and are given Bible story books, as part of the process of learning to read. As adults, we hear these stories in Church. A preacher might get up in front of his worshipers and speak in great detail about the Tower of Babel. He may even give some kind of explanation of what that story means for us today.

At some other time he may choose to speak of how Jesus will be a king and priest in the manner of Melchizedek. But you will never hear any Representative of any of the Empire’s religions speaking in any way that would allow someone to figure out, that these two stories are part of a single event. Doing so could potentially lead to revealing Precious Bible Truths capable of weakening Satan’s grasp on God’s children.

The Bible does not go into great detail about every aspect of life immediately following the flood. But we do know that up until the birth of Abram, not a single death had been recorded following the flood. In fact the very first mention of death after the flood, was the death of Peleg, which took place when Abram was 48 years old. The death of Peleg is much more significant than any of the cults of Christianity, Judaism, or Islam want you to know.

I am now going to be speaking about some seemingly unimportant dates and events, that at first might sound boring and confusing, but when I am done, I will put the whole story together so that you can go back, and confirm for yourself that everything that I am telling you today is accurate.

You will probably be shocked that you didn’t figure all of this out on your own, and will likely rejoice, that after years of being lied to, you can now confidently walk away from whatever religion has been telling you those lies.

The Bible records very detailed information about the timing of events in the ancient past, however that information was written down long before our modern Ano Domini calendar was created.

Since there is no way for us to know for certain when events from the ancient past took place according to our modern calendars, it would be best if we study this information using the ancient Ano Mundi Calendar. I explained how that calendar worked in the previous video.

We are not told of exactly when Noah’s Grandson Nimrod began to build cities. In fact, we don’t even know when Nimrod was born, or when he died. But we do know that he was Noah’s Great Grandson, so as a contemporary of Noah’s other Great Grandson Salah who lived from 1693AM to 2126AM we can expect that Nimrod would have lived at roughly the same time as Salah. Although not precise, this information gives us a good basis for determining the general timing for the construction and fall of Babel.

We know that Abram met with Melchizedek in the promised land and we also know that Abram did not leave Ur to travel to the promised land, until he was 75 years old, meaning that his meeting with Melchizedek would have to have taken place sometime between 2023 and 2123AM.

The meeting between Abram and Melchizedek took place after Abram ended a war between the Kings from The East and the kings residing within the promised land, that had descended from Canaan. The Bible makes a point of telling us that immediately after the flood the Earth, was for the most part united, and that this was the situation for quite some time.

The details of the life and death of Abraham’s Great Great Great Grandfather reveal another clue to determining when this era of peace officially ended, and when the meeting between Abraham and Melchizedek took place. As the Bible says at Genesis 10:25 Eber had a son that was named Peleg, because in his days the Earth became divided. Peleg lived from 1757 to 1956AM.

The war that Abraham participated in could not have taken place prior to the birth of Peleg in 1757AM. But most likely would have taken place at the end of Peleg’s life in 1956AM.

When Peleg died, he was 239 years old. As old as that might seem today, at the time it was exceptionally young. As I said Earlier, the Bible does not record the dates of every birth and death of everyone involved, but of those that are recorded, none had ever died as young as Peleg. In fact prior to the Death of Peleg, the shortest natural lifespan of anyone that had ever lived was that of Noah’s father Lemech at 777 years old.

That means that Peleg’s life span was 538 years shorter than any other human that had ever Lived, with the exception of Enoch who God intentionally took prematurely. It is an undeniable fact that Peleg had to have died some kind of unnatural violent death. If we take into consideration that Peleg was named as a result of the war, we can safely assume that he got his name by being the first casualty of that war. Were we to give this war a name, it would not be wrong to call it “The War Of Peleg”.

A major event spoken of as part of this Bible account is reported to have taken place in the land to the East when people miraculously lost the ability to communicate with one another. Genesis 11:9 says:

“Because there the LORD confused the language of all the Earth and from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the Earth.” That means, that for a certainty we can say that the Exodus from Babylon would have taken place sometime between 1757 and 1956AM.

Since this account includes the Table of Nations as found at Chapter 10 of Genesis, we can expect that every single family line mentioned was somehow involved when these events began to take place. Since the Bible did not record the births and deaths of everyone on the list, we can expect that the dates that are recorded, are the only ones that are important to understanding the chronology of the story.

Even for me, it is quite difficult to keep the story straight in my head. I had to carefully document every date, and event mentioned in the Bible, on a chart that is available on the website. It will make the story much easier to understand if you follow along on the chart while I am describing the details of this account. It may be even easier to understand if you listen to the whole story all the way through and then go back and follow along with the chart afterwards.

After the flood, humanity began to settle into a relatively small area of the Earth called Shinar, which means land of two rivers. Those two rivers are the Tigris and Euphrates. The entire area would eventually become known as the Babylonian Empire. According to Genesis 10:9, the first human ruler to rebel against Noah was his Great Grandson Nimrod, who is called a mighty hunter in the sight of Yahweh.

In our English Bibles we are told that the languages became confused at Babel, and later in the Bible we are told that the Jews were conquered and taken into captivity in Babylon. The distinction between Babel and Babylon only exists in our English Translations of the Bible. In the original Hebrew text, the names of the two are identical. The distinction made by the Churches is false. Babel is Babylon.

In 1948AM Abram was born there, in a world that was united. Everyone spoke the same language, and no one had ever died since the time of the flood. When Abram was 48 years old, his Great Great Great Grandfather Peleg died, what would have been an untimely death, likely as the first victim of the war that would disrupt Abram’s life.

Ten years after Peleg’s death, Noah died. It was at this time that Abram was called to go to a strange land. Abram’s tribe was called the Hebrews after his Great Great Great Great Grandfather Eber, who’s name means from the land beyond. Eber was Peleg’s father.

It is very likely that Babylon fell, and the languages of mankind were confused in 2006AM, the same year that Noah died. In fact it is possible that the death of Noah was the actual event that triggered the confusion of the languages.

The scriptures support this assumption, and there are no scriptures that contradict it. To this day, linguist acknowledge that all of mankind’s languages can be divided into three primary branches, Hamitic, Semitic, and Aryan. These divisions follow the same pattern spoken of in “The Table Of Nations” found in Genesis Chapter 10.

Hamitic languages are spoken by the peoples who descended from Ham. Semitic languages are spoken by the peoples who descended from Shem. And Aryan languages are spoken by the peoples that descended from Japheth. Obviously those who study languages were influenced by the Babylon Story and it’s association with the table of nations.

That, in no way detracts from the fact that 3,500 years ago, while travel and communication were still extremely primitive, the Bible accurately recorded the origin and dispersion of every language spoken on this planet, and the three primary branches of those languages.

Linguist did not use the Bible account of the confusion of the languages as a pattern for creating some kind of fiction. The differences and similarities that exist between the languages of man are very real. The patterns that linguist associate with the three major divisions of the languages are very easy to perceive, even by those of us who are not trained to do so.

Abram left Ur in 2023. It is obvious that the languages of man had already been confused prior to his entering the promised land, because the names of the Kings involved in the war were not in the same language as that of Abram.

When Abram was called out of Ur he was not the only one that took flight. In fact the promised land was not his first stop. As recorded it is difficult to understand exactly what Abram was doing, but it seems as if he traveled around the outskirts of the land of Canaan for quite some time before finally making his way to Egypt, hundreds of miles past Canaan, to the South West. Only stopping on the outskirts of the promised land to make camp twice.

According to the account, Abram’s migration was motivated by a famine in the land. When he arrived in Egypt he encountered a people ruled over by a man called Pharaoh. The details of how these people had ended up in Egypt are not revealed, but it is likely that the death of Noah, the confusion of the languages, the famine in Canaan, and the ensuing war, drove them all to migrate at about the same time. In other words The Egyptians probably didn’t arrive in Egypt much earlier than Abram and Sari. Perhaps at the same exact time. (Genesis 11:9, 12:2)

In any case Abraham did eventually make the promised land his home, but we have no way of knowing exactly when. He left Ur when he was 75, but a lot of things happened between the time he left Ur, and the time he finally settled in Canaan.

This war took place in the very ancient past, which would explain why the kings Amraphel, Arioch, and Chedorlaomer have names of uncertain origin. Many cultures from the ancient past no longer exist. Being so short lived, it is likely that the nations that these particular kings represented did not have time to leave any trace of their languages in written form.

According to Hebrews 7:1, which was written hundreds of years later, Abram didn’t just defeat these kings, he completely exterminated them. Without political leaders or a military and probably without even any remaining men, these people likely ceased to exist as nations, and were absorbed by the surrounding nations very early in human history.

The Kings that Abram rescued were no better than the kings that Abram rescued them from. Even though the five kings of the promised land likely owed their lives to Abram, they still demanded that he give back their human property. As 2Peter 2:7 indicates, Lot did not wish to be returned to Sodom. But apparently the Kings of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela, were every bit as vile as the Kings that Abram had exterminated.

Genesis 14:4 explains in human terms why the Kings from Shinar were so obsessed with hunting down the Kings of the promised land.

“For twelve years they had served Chedorlaomer but in the thirteenth year they rebelled.”

Apparently Chedorlaomer was either in line to be the successor of Nimrod, or he was attempting to take that position by force.

Nimrod’s reputation for hunting was likely based on his prowess as a hunter of humans. The Bible clearly indicates that Chedorlaomer was in the promised land, engaging in the same behavior that had made Nimrod famous.

Both Nimrod, and Chedorlaomer, just like those who rule the world in our day, were engaged in the great contest that world rulers use to determine who is the most powerful man alive? The hunting, capturing, and killing of human beings is, and always has been Civilization’s way of determining the winner, in mankind’s quest for world domination.

Since Bera of Sodom demanded that Abram return Lot and the other people that he had rescued, Bera was very obviously a hunter of men as well. Since the death of Peleg, mankind has never once experienced so much as a single day of peace. Even on the days when no shots have been fired, soldiers have always been busy preparing for the combat that their rulers have planned for the following day.

Even though mankind has a way of naming different parts of this war, as if they are different wars, it should be more than obvious that every soldier ever sent out to fight has been participating in the very same war. It is Peleg’s war that continues to rage on to this very day.

Chronologically the 12 year period in which the Kings of the Promised land would have served the Kings of Shinar would have to have occurred sometime after the death of Peleg, but prior to Abraham’s migration into Canaan. Abram wandered around the promised land for an extended time. Perhaps for the entire 12 years leading up to the rebellion.

When the languages became confused at Genesis11:9 and the people fled from the East to spread across the face of the Earth, those who assumed power at Noah’s death, probably felt that they had the right to enslave any nation that was unable to defend itself. Just as Earth’s current world rulers feel today. It is obvious from the account that many powerful wicked men were taking advantage of the death of Noah in their bids for world domination.

When Abram met Melchizedek at the Valley of Shaveh, he acknowledged Melchizedek’s position as rightful king, by bestowing upon him a tenth of what he had taken in the war. The illegitimate kings were there as well, but instead of making offerings to Melchizedek, as Abram had done, Bera of Sodom demanded that Abram make offerings to him as well. Since Melchizedek means rightful king, the demands of these other kings would have been extremely disrespectful. Not just to Melchizedek, but to our creator as well.

Shortly after the meeting between Abram and Melchizedek, God chose to exterminate all of the kings of the promised land personally, along with all of their supporters.

Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, were all completely wiped out when God rained down fire and brimstone, destroying everyone, and everything, associated with those cities.

The only city, that took part in the war, to be spared was Bela, because as the Bible says, they were insignificant. The name of Bela which means destruction was changed to Zoar, which means insignificant.(Genesis 14:8)

It is likely that the nation of Bela was not concerned with World Domination but simply doing as commanded by Bera, the King of Sodom. It is also likely that after Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed, Zoar submitted itself to Melchizedek’s rule. Even in our day hundreds of nations that are too militarily weak to defend themselves have chosen to enter into alliances with more powerful nations as a survival strategy.

In 2047 God changed Abram’s name which in Hebrew, means exalted father to Abraham, which is made up of the Hebrew word ab meaning father, and raham which is from an unknown language, perhaps meaning population. (Genesis 17:5)

Abraham’s name change is not as dramatic as other name changes recorded in the Bible, since both names mean basically the same thing. But knowing that his Hebrew name was changed to a name made up of words from two different languages is likely more significant.

If Abraham was just intended to be the father of the Hebrews his name would have remained in Hebrew. His title of Father Abraham was indicative of an honor involving more than just the Hebrew nation.

As part of the incident involving the Birth of Canaan, Noah declared “Praise be to Yahweh, the God of Shem”. (Genesis 9:26) This statement declaring Shem’s relationship with God to be somehow different from that of his brothers, mirrors similar statements that would be made by Abraham when speaking of Isaac, and Isaac when speaking of Jacob.

As Jacob approached his death, he prophesied about each of his sons. At Genesis 49:8-10 Jacob declared that the rulers staff would not depart from Judah.

Throughout the Bible, there are many such statements made about members of this family line. As time progressed this line would produce David’s father Jesse, David, and eventually David’s Descendant Jesus.

Each person on this list would qualify as the recipient of what the Bible consistently refers to as the promise. But very few would actually receive it.

Prior to the death of Noah, no one would have received it. As the obvious tribal head, there would be no need to replace Noah. As long as he remained alive, he would be the head of the family. The land that would be under the control of Noah, would be the entire planet.

Peleg died in 1996AM, and Noah didn’t die until ten years later.

The thirst for power in and of itself is insane. But, when we take into consideration that this war over rulership was being fought while God’s chosen ruler, Noah, the family head of everyone on the Earth, was still alive, there can be no denying that wicked spirit forces had to have been involved.

Every human on Earth would have known Noah, and known about Noah’s close relationship with God. Everyone would have known that he was their oldest ancestor, and that he was the builder of the Ark that brought all living things through the flood.

Just as Eve had been fooled by Satan, hundreds of years earlier, those political leaders were being fooled by Satan in Abraham’s day. Not only that, but the soldiers and citizens that supported that system of unnatural governance, would also have to have been under the influence of Satan as well. There is no other explanation for their wicked behavior.

Satan’s promise to the first woman that she could be just like the gods is still the only possible explanation for why any human being would lust after political power. After the flood, humans still craved the political power that Satan had offered to Eve, before the flood.

It is a commonly held belief of religious people that God brought the flood as a means of ridding the world of evil. But according to the Bible, Noah’s life before the flood was not much different from his life after the flood.

When Noah did eventually die, Natural law, according to Commandment number five, to honor your father and mother would still be the only hierarchical social structure, that God approved of, but since no one would have been the recognized father of everyone alive, natural law would no longer be possible. A suitable replacement would have to be chosen by God himself.

Genesis 9:26 indicates that of the three sons of Noah that were born prior to the flood, Shem’s relationship with God was somehow unique. Shem is the only son of Noah on the the list of ancestors leading up to the birth of Jesus. And although the promise of receiving the inheritance, or possession is held out to each and every one of us, those on the list are spoken of as receiving both in a unique way.

When Noah died, Shem was 448 years old. Shem as the son, in line for the inheritance, would rightfully have been the possessor of the land for the remainder of his life, which would have ended 152 years later. As the declared possessor of the land, the one in line for the inheritance, the only one of Noah’s sons, listed among those chosen as Noah’s replacement, there can be no doubt, that it was only Shem who would have the legal right to the inheritance. Shem would be the possessor of the land.

This is not the only time in history when a replacement had to be chosen for the recognized head of the human family. After Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden of Eden, the next important event to take place involved their two sons Cain and Abel.

We are told that the two had appeared before the entrance in order to make offerings. Cain’s offering was rejected while that of his brother was accepted. Out of jealousy Cain killed Abel. Several verses later Eve gives birth to another son by Adam, and calls his name Seth. (Genesis 4:25)

In Hebrew, Seth means Set, as in “set in place”. When Eve declared that God had given her a replacement for Abel, calling his name Seth, she was in effect declaring that Seth had been set in place as the heir apparent of Adam. Our English word Set comes from the Hebrew word Seth. In Egyptian mythology the name of the God Set is believed to have been pronounced Seth. It is likely that the Egyptian God Set, was actually Seth the son of Adam and Eve.

If you look at the chart on the website you can confirm this for yourself. Adam died at the age of 930. His son Seth although not the oldest male offspring of Adam was next in line for the inheritance, Cain having been rejected by God, and Abel having been killed. Seth lived for 112 years after Adam’s death.

Another line of reasoning for coming to this conclusion, is based on something that was told to Abraham at Genesis 12:7:

“I will give this land to your seed as an inheritance.”

Later Moses was told that God had made this same promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But at these particular verses, Abraham is not told that the land would be given to him as an inheritance.

This information has not been hidden by the Churches. There have been great theological debates about whether or not Abraham himself ever possessed the land. There are in fact verses that very clearly state that the land was given to Abraham, such as the ones at Genesis 13:15, and17:8. But in the original languages that is not the case at all.

Such verses would be more accurately rendered in ways such as this:

“I will give this land to your offspring because of you”


“I will give you this land for your offspring.”

In any case, these verses, just like many others that seem to contradict one another, do not contradict one another as originally written. Abraham personally was not to be the one that would inherit the land.

If we look once again at the chart, that is posted on the website, it is very clear that Abraham could never inherit the land because when he died in 2123AM, his ancestors Eber, and Shem were still alive. According to natural law, Abraham could not could not take possession of the land while his ancestors Shem and later Eber occupied those positions of authority.

At Shem’s death Eber would have been next in line for the inheritance, but 29 years later he too would be dead, meaning that at the death of Eber, None of the men on the list of Abraham’s ancestors would be left alive. At Eber’s death, Isaac would become the oldest living male member of the tribe, that was included on the list found at Genesis Chapter 11. So now you know why it was Isaac who received the inheritance, and not his father Abraham.

Abraham was never the oldest living male member of the tribe. According to recognized tribal law, Abraham did not live long enough to inherit the land, but true to God’s word Isaac, Abraham’s seed, would.

It is a popular misconception that the prophecy about Abraham’s seed inheriting the land, would be fulfilled by the Nation of Israel, and that according to God’s law, they would possess the land in perpetuity.

It is true that there are verses that seem to support this belief. In fact when granting the land to the nation at Deuteronomy 1:8 Moses specifically associated the promise made to Abraham with their entry into the land.

Apparently the belief that the nation of Israel itself, fulfilled the promise made to Abraham was a common misconception even in the first century. At Galatians 3:16 Paul addressed this false belief.

“The promise to Abraham was not made to seeds (plural), but to the (seed), singular. As in your seed, the Christ.”

It should be obvious that each and every man that Jesus descended from would have been the inheritor of the land. Since each of those men was a member of the family that we today think of as the nation of Israel, or later, as the Jews, it makes perfect sense that each of those men would have lived in that land of their inheritance, with their extended families.

Another reason that so many people would have benefited from that original promise of an inheritance, would have been the fact that the promise originated with Shem. If we look at the details, we can see a pattern that can not be denied.

According to the Bible, the area that God promised to Abraham encompassed all of the land between the Nile, and the Euphrates. That would be a huge area of the Earth. An area extending all the way from Egypt to Babylon. Genesis 15:18 records the details of God’s covenant with Abraham.

“In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates”

If we read the entire Bible without any kind of Zionist agenda, we will see, that in fact all of Shem’s descendants ended up settling in this vast stretch of land. The only descendants of Abraham that settled in what we today consider to be the promised land are the descendants of Jacob also known as Israel.

Jacob was just one of Abraham’s Grandchildren, but he is the one that was the recipient of the promise, the others ended up settling in the surrounding area, along with all of Shem’s other descendants.

When Israel eventually settled in the land, the promise that God made with the Israelites was very similar to the one that he had made with Abraham hundreds of years earlier. But unlike the promise made to Abraham, this one would involve a much smaller partial of land. Exodus 23:31 describes it this way:

“I shall set your borders, from the Red Sea to the Sea of the Philistines, to the wilderness and to the river, for I will give the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you shall drive them out before you.”

Most modern Bibles have inserted the word Euphrates into this verse. However there is no scriptural support for doing such a thing, whatsoever. In the original Hebrew copies of the text, the river is left unnamed. Since the only river ever mentioned as an entry point into the promised land, is the Jordan, it simply doesn’t make any sense to conclude that the river mentioned at this verse is the Euphrates hundreds of miles away deep into enemy territory.

Eventually Israel’s family grew in numbers so large, that it became divided into 12 tribes, based on the 12 families of his 12 sons. Jesus would be born of the tribe of Judah.

By the time that Jacob, who became Israel, was born, he would have been part of an enormous family. If you look at a map of all of the land promised to Abraham, and compare that to the land that was promised to Israel, it’s pretty easy to see that God was very equitable in his distribution of the land.

Seemingly each of the families that descended from Shem received a portion of the land. Jacob’s family only being set apart from the others because one of his descendants was to be, what in Hebrew is called the Messiah, which in Greek, would be the Christ.

But once again a promise was made, and this time it was going to be to Jacob’s son Judah. After migrating into the promised land, the land was divided once again, this time into 12 parts, according to family heads, and even though Judah had died hundreds of year earlier, his descendants would inherit a portion of the land, but once again Judah’s portion was only going to be a small part of what was promised to Israel.

Please think about what I am saying. After the flood Noah would have been the recognized ruler of the entire Earth. At his death each of his son’s would have inherited a portion of that Earth. Shem’s portion being the entire area between Africa and Babylon. At the death of Abraham, Shem, Eber, and Isaac, Jacob would have become the inheritor of the promise, but his portion of the land would have only been the area that most think of as The Promised Land today.

Jesus was born of the Tribe of Judah, which possessed only a small portion of the land that had been promised to Israel. Roughly 1/12 of that land. When David’s father Jesse died, David would have become the inheritor of the promise, since it was his seed that would eventually lead to the Messiah. Acts 2:30 words it like this:

“Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne.”

It could be said that at that point King David inherited the entire Promised Land being that he was the father of the nation. But according to the Bible, David’s entire extended family lived in a very small portion of the land that to this day is known as The City of David. Luke 2:4 mentions this area of the Earth in this way:

“And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David.”

Hopefully, you are understanding what I am saying. As the population grew, each of the men that is mentioned in the Bible as being in line for the inheritance, received smaller and smaller portions than their predecessors, By the time that the seed finally arrived, the portion of the land that came with the inheritance was nonexistent. At Luke 9:58 Jesus explained it this way:

“Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.”

Currently, Earth wide, a struggle is going on over control of this small area of the Earth, as if this land is the most significant spot on the Planet. According to the Bible, it isn’t the land that we are suppose to concern ourselves with. It is, and always has been the seed. That seed being Jesus.

When Jesus was alive, he ruled over none of the land. At Matthew 4:1-10 we are told that the ruler of the world approached Jesus with an offer that most would have greedily accepted:

“Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. And he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.” Then Jesus said to him, “Be gone, Satan! For it is written, You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve.”

It should be obvious that the promise was never about that particular piece of land. From the very beginning, the promise was about Jesus.

Since this family line began at Adam’s creation, and continued all the way to Jesus, nearly 4,000 years later, someone might wonder who the seed would be today? Just as Galatians 3:16 says, our seed is Jesus.

The Greek word used here is sou. (Strong’s G4771) There is no denying that the word sou, can only be translated as your. It is unlikely that you will find an English Bible that has the word your, as part of the text, but it is there in every ancient manuscript of this verse. Which of course is easy enough to confirm via the internet.

If we look at each and every person on the list, there isn’t any ambiguity about how they came to possess the inheritance. They all descended genetically, from the previous person on the list. None of those on the list were nephews of the previous person on the list. None were adopted sons. And as in the case of Canaan, Ishmael, and Lot, none were what we today would call illegitimate.

If the line of descent had continued, the Bible would have recorded the name of each of those next in line for the inheritance, but it doesn’t. When Paul referred to Jesus as YOUR seed, he was doing so long after Jesus’ death. If Jesus had an heir, Paul would have referred to Jesus’ legal heir as your seed.

In our day there are quite a few theories regarding the parts of Jesus’ life that are not recorded in the Bible. Many of those theories address his relationship with the women that followed him, as if it is impossible for a man to interact with women without producing children.

Obviously as a man Jesus would have had all of the same emotions, and sexual desires that any healthy natural man would have had. But since none of that is discussed in the Bible, we can rest assured that the details of Jesus’ sex life would not add to our understanding of anything in any significant way.

There is nothing in the Bible about Jesus having children, or Jesus not having children. But since Paul specifically referred to Jesus as your seed, years after his death, it should be obvious that the right of inheritance ended with Jesus death.

But even if Jesus had children, they would not have inherited anything. According to the pattern set in the Bible, any inheritance that Jesus would have gotten would have come through the line of Joseph. Joseph was not Jesus’ father. Jesus was adopted.

Over the years many have speculated about the identity of Melchizedek. Some religions teach that Melchizedek is Jesus himself. Certainly he could be called the King of Righteousness. And now that we understand that the actual title is rightful king, the association between Jesus and Melchizedek is even more profound.

A strong Jewish tradition exist that Melchizedek was Shem, the son of Noah. Obviously he is on the list of Abraham’s ancestors, and is specifically spoken of as having a unique relationship with his God Yahweh, that his brothers did not have. It is also undeniable that Shem would have still been alive when Abram met with Melchizedek.

According to The Bible all religions are under the direct control of God’s enemy, Satan.(2Corinthians 4:4) That doesn’t mean that they never tell the truth. Religions often teach truth as a means of tricking good people into joining their ranks.

At John 8:44 Jesus said that Satan had no truth in him because he was a liar from the very beginning, and yet 2Corinthians 11:14, says that Satan masquerades as an Angel of light.

It could be possible that one of the religions is telling the truth about the identity of Melchizedek. But unless he is both Shem and Jesus, at least one is teaching lies. And since neither Judaism, nor Christianity has a very good reputation for truth, the most likely scenario is that both are lying.

Just knowing that there are main stream religions teaching that Melchizedek is Jesus, or that Melchizedek is Shem, almost guarantees that he is neither.

The very first King mentioned after the flood was Nimrod. Since Nimrod’s name was not mentioned among the Kings invading the land from Shinnar, the possibility does exist that Nimrod was Melchizedek. It may not sound right, but at this point, we really need to be aware of all of our options.

Another possibility that exist is that one of Noah’s other legitimate sons is Melchizedek. After all, if Shem was still alive, it is likely that his brothers were still alive as well. Even though it is obvious that Shem stands out from the others, we can not automatically eliminate Ham or Japheth.

There are several significant Bible personalities that would have been alive at the time, but could not have been Melchizedek due to simple logic. God himself could not have been Melchizedek because Melchizedek is spoken of as a priest of God. Abraham could not have been Melchizedek, because he is said to have paid tithes to Melchizedek.

I have tried my best to describe every major character in the Bible that was alive at the time, in order to determine the identity of Melchizedek, but there is always the possibility that Melchizedek was not mentioned anywhere else in The Bible.

At this point we have to consider every possibility. Even if we know with all of our hearts who Melchizedek is, we need to prove to ourselves that there is no possibility that he could be someone else.

If you are a religious person, what I am about to reveal to you is going to sound preposterous. But if you are open minded and willing to hear me out, you will be surprised at just how logical, what I am going to tell you, actually is.

Although I am going to finish out this video by exposing the true identity of Melchizedek using nothing more than one simple verse, pointing out one simple, basic, undeniable fact, I promise you that I will be sharing much more information on this subject in the remainder of the videos in this series. And when I am done, you will know in your heart, that I am right.

You will know who Melchizedek is. You will know more about the Bible, than anybody anywhere, in any of Civilization’s religions. If you speak publicly about what I am about to reveal to you, you can expect to be ridiculed and abused by those who belong to Satan’s cults. Choose who you speak with about these things carefully.

Abraham spent his time in The Promised Land as what the Bible calls a Maguwr (Strong’s H4033) This ancient Hebrew word is rendered as Stranger in the King James Version of the Bible. The NIV renders this word as foreigner. The NWT renders it as alien resident. The point being that Abraham was never a citizen of the land that he entered.

At Genesis 12:1 it is revealed to us that God commanded Abram to leave his father’s house and travel to a land that he would show him. As worded this verse does not reveal any details as to where Abram would be going. But at the historical account found at Genesis 11:31 we are told

“They went forth from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan”.

Most of us have heard this story so many times, that we never stop to think about what it means. When Abram entered the promised land, he did so as an alien. Traveling from his home of Ur into the land of Canaan. His home was not just listed by name, but according to the people that it belonged to. Ur of the Chaldeans.

The Hebrew word that is here rendered as Chaldee, or in some Bibles as Chaldeans actually means “Clod Breakers”. A clod breaker would be anyone that breaks up the ground. Since the Babylonian Empire was known for building with bricks and bitumen, and also for relying on agriculture, clod breaker would be a very good description of the people that occupied the Chaldean Empire.

The point being that Abraham did not simply come from Ur. He came from Ur of the Chaldeans. And the description of the land that God would show him was just as detailed as the description of his home.

“The land of Canaan”

Quite literally Canaan’s land. This is the location where the meeting between Abram the foreigner and Melchizedek the rightful king took place.

If Abram of Ur was a foreigner, because he was a Chaldean, Then it is only logical to conclude that Melchizedek the rightful king, was not a foreigner. Since the meeting took place in Canaan’s land, it is only logical to conclude that the rightful king of Canaan’s land would have been Canaan.

Canaan’s older brother Shem was still alive. It should be obvious that Canaan would also still be alive. It is a provable fact that Canaan was born no earlier than 1656AM. If Canaan lived as long as his contemporaries Shem and Arphaxad, he would have likely died sometime between 2094 and 2266AM. Meaning that we have no reason to imagine that Canaan was not still alive when the meeting between Abram and Melchizedek took place sometime after 2023.

Think about what that means. If Melchizedek was Shem or Jesus why doesn’t the Bible refer to the area of the Earth over which Melchizedek ruled, as “The Land Of Shem”, or “The Land Of Jesus”, or simply as the “Land of Melchizedek”?

Psalms 110 Begins with the words:

“Jehovah says to my lord: sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.”

Very powerful words obviously said by God to Jesus. Which eventually is confirmed in The Book of Hebrews. The Psalm continues at verse 4 with the words:

“Yahweh has sworn, and he will not change his mind, you are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.”

When this verse was written, it is likely that no one had any idea of how this prophecy would play out. Nearly a thousand years later, Jesus was born and yet no one was able to understand how his birth could have anything to do with the fulfillment of this prophecy.

But, years after Jesus’ death, a book was produced and given to mankind, fully explaining the words of Psalms 110, so that we today can know and understand just why Canaan’s roll was so important. That book, is known today as The Book of Hebrews.

According to 2Peter 2:10, the Kings of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, were destroyed for despising authority. Or as other versions of the Bible say “scoffing at supernatural beings” or “blaspheming glorious ones”. Obviously the glorious ones that they were despising were Melchizedek, their oldest living ancestor, and Melchizedek’s God, the creator of natural law.

The Bible clearly states that all of the kings of the promised land were sons of Canaan. By refusing to be obedient to Melchizedek, they were breaking the commandment to honor their father.

Genesis 10:15-19 clearly states that all of the kings of, Sodom, Gomorah, and the others, that God killed with fire and brimstone were descendants of Canaan.

When we hear something that goes completely against everything that we have ever been taught, we need that teaching to be based on much more than a couple of scriptures. After all, every lie taught by the churches can be supported by a couple of scriptures, and we certainly don’t want the foundation of our faith to be as precarious as that of Satan’s cults.

Abraham and his seed are very important to the Bible narrative, and yet, it was he who made offerings to Melchizedek, and not the other way around. In part 5 of this video series, we will be closely examining every verse in The Bible specifically about Melchizedek.

In the mean time, the next video in this series will be about a group of beings that in many bibles are described as giants. Some Bibles call them Nephilim. The information that I will be revealing in part 4 of this series will positively identify who these mysterious beings are for the first time in thousands of years.

As mysterious as Melchizedek’s identity might be to the members of the varying sects of man, it need not be mysterious to us. Abraham’s seed would eventually lead to Jesus, a King and Priest in the order of Melchizedek.

If you don’t want to survive………. don’t listen to me.

Melchizedek Part 2 Religion Perpetuates A Myth

Hello and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need, to not only survive the current apocalypse but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be the second in this series about, Melchizedek, one of the most enigmatic figures in the entire Bible.

In Part 1 of this series, I talked about the difference between our biological parents and our spiritual parents. Genetically it can not be denied that we have all descended from a single source. Having God as our father we are all brothers and sisters. If we are able to recognize this fact, than it could be said that God is both our biological father as well as our spiritual father.

But early on, Eve made the decision to be obedient to Satan, who was not her biological father, and to this day, as the Bible clearly states, Satan sits as the recognized ruler of civilization. (1John 5:19, 2Corinthians 4:4)

There are still those that look to God as their father, and struggle against the system in an attempt to do his will, but for the most part, when given the choice, most will reject God’s natural law, and fight to the death in defense of the unnatural laws of civilization’s feuding families.

Genesis Chapter 3 describes the conversation between Eve and Satan as if Eve was actually speaking with a fleshly being. In the conversation Satan offered Eve the opportunity to be like a god. Later at Matthew Chapter 4 Jesus spoke directly to Satan as well. In the account Satan offered Jesus rulership over all of the kingdoms of the Earth. The offer that Satan made to Eve was not much different than the offer that he made to Jesus.

Unlike Jesus, few of us are offered the opportunity to rule the world, but each and every one of us, in some way, on a daily basis is put to the test. Those who willingly participate in the social order that Jesus rejected, by their actions, reveal the identity of their spiritual father.

It is not possible for us to say with certainty how Satan continues to rule over his civilization, whether in the flesh or in the spirit, but we do know that fleshly men, and women currently hold the positions that Eve accepted, and Jesus rejected.

There can be no doubt that all of the Kings, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and other such political rulers are still receiving direction from the one that has been in control from the day that Eve was deceived into breaking God’s law.(1Timothy 2:14)

By willingly supporting those that have been placed in positions of power by Satan, the vast majority of mankind has by default rejected God and the one that he has placed into a position of power. Jesus is God’s chosen King. All others who assume positions of authority are not.

Millions willingly send their children off to murder the children of their neighbors, in carnal warfare. We are taught from infancy to believe that the wars that the nations engage in are individual events. But to anyone with an open mind, and the ability to see past the Empire’s propaganda, it is obvious that our world has been engaged a single uninterrupted war for world domination for the entire history of civilization.

Those in our day, who like Eve, have been seduced by Satan’s offer, must now compete with millions of others who have been similarly effected.

Understanding Melchizedek’s roll in The Bible is going to be key to understanding one of the most important aspects of God’s promises to one day rescue mankind, and restore our Earth, to the original pristine paradise that it once was. By the time this series concludes each and every person that hears this information will have to deal with some very serious issues regarding their faith.

One of the biggest obstacles that we face in trying to determine who Melchizedek is, and what he represents is our exposure to Satan’s propaganda system.

All Civilizations throughout all of human history have been under the control of Satan. The three primary systems that have defined every civilized culture from the beginning of time all the way to our day have been The Governmental System, Economic System, and Religious System. A large part of which is represented by traditional religions. But would also include such things as the religions of science, and the networks.

None of the three could exist without the other two. Any human being who stopped for a minute to think about things would instantly recognize that both the Governmental System and the Economic system, are wicked, unfair, and brutal.

Since it goes against human nature to participate in anything that is evil, Satan had to established a system dedicated to convincing mankind that evil is good, and good is evil.(Isaiah 5:20) Many people believe that religion is nothing more than a system of pointless rituals designed to appease the gods. But religion’s true purpose is much more insidious than just a means of wasting peoples time and resources. The primary purpose of all religions is to conceal basic truth from humanity.

A good propaganda system is essential in order for any human government to function effectively. Before human beings will submit to being ruled over by others, they must first be convinced that the government that they are forced to serve, is somehow superior to all other governments. In the English speaking world propaganda is called public relations.

It takes quite a bit of convincing to get people to participate in civilization, because it goes against natural law. That natural law was spelled out thousands of years ago in what today has become known as The Ten Commandments.

Because the Ten Commandments have been so poorly translated many people never make the connection between The Ten Commandments and Natural Law. Most believe the Ten to be a list of religious rules.

The Commandment to honor our father and mother, as recorded in the original language of ancient Hebrew, would have been understood by those who lived in that ancient culture, as a commandment to recognize the only human hierarchy ever approved by God. The family.

In our day the world is not ruled by our family heads, but by a small ruthless group of very wicked people. According to civilization’s laws, Presidents, Kings, Prime Ministers, and other powerful men and women outrank fathers and mothers. An absolutely horrific perversion of “Natural Law”. A direct rebellion against God’s “Ten Commandments”.

The commandment, “Thou Shalt Not Steal”, word for word in Ancient Hebrew would be “Do not Carry away”. Many people who are familiar with the English version of this commandment would understand that it is wrong to rob a bank, but for the most part do not see transporting sales goods across vast oceans as any kind of sin at all.

Obviously as originally worded, “Thou Shalt Not Carry Away”, would identify civilization’s entire economic system as yet another horrific perversion of “Natural Law”. Another direct rebellion against God’s Ten Commandments.

Religion itself is the single most horrific perversion of all. As found at Exodus 20:2,3, the very first commandment states, “I am the LORD thy God, you shall have no God’s before me.” As translated this verse quite accurately represents the original thought. The only problem being the poor translation of the other commandments.

If we are only familiar with the modern language versions of the other nine, the first commandment to have no other gods, would sound to us like a commandment to have no god other than the “God Of Civilization”. “The God of Religion”. The god of the English translation of the Ten Commandments.

All religions Earth wide, support the concept of autonomy, human self rule, along with the governmental and economic systems necessary to give credence to the fiction of self rule. That being the case, it is reasonable to conclude that all religions Earth wide serve Civilization, and it’s God.

In The Bible, the God of Civilization is called Satan.(1John 5:19) Many people falsely believe that the Bible is a rule book for how to achieve some kind of heavenly reward. But for anyone who would simply pick up a Bible and read it for themselves, without any preconceived notions, it is more than obvious that this is not true at all.

Far from being any kind of rule book, the Bible is simply a written account of the war between Creation and Civilization, which could also be thought of as the war between God’s Kingdom, and Satan’s Empire. Anyone putting their faith in Civilization’s Governmental Systems, Economic Systems, or Religious Systems. Would be breaking the most important of God’s laws.

By default anyone doing the will of Satan, would be fulfilling all of the requirements associated with Satan Worship. In effect breaking God’s commandment to have no other gods. Commandment Number 1. What most would consider to be the single most important of all of God’s natural laws.

The very first event to take place associated with this war occurred in Chapter 3 of Genesis. After promising the first woman that she could be like a god, Eve entered into what is called a covenant, a two way legally binding agreement, with Satan.

Prior to entering into Satan’s covenant, Adam and Eve lived in a paradise. But shortly after Eve convinced Adam to partake of the fruit, the couple was cast out, and God pronounced judgment on each of the participants in The rebellion.

Since then, millions have participated in The very same Satanic Covenant. Many having done so in protest. However, to this day the majority cannot resist the enticement of what the covenant promises.

Self Rule, the false belief that individuals can benefit from converting our planets resources into something that God never intended, and then dividing the spoils according to some artificial hierarchical contest, is so intoxicating to those who suffer from power addiction, that they simply cannot resist. They, just like Eve have fallen for the original deception spoken of at 1Timothy 2:14, which records that Satan’s promise to Eve was a deception.

That deception took place in The Garden of Eden,when Satan promised Eve at Genesis 3:4,5:

“For a certainty, you will not die, but your eyes will be opened and you yourself will be able to determine what is good and what is bad, just like gods.”

When God pronounced sentence on Satan, Adam, and Eve, the predictions that he made, eventually became the world that we find ourselves in today. The war between creation and civilization had begun. As described at Genesis 3:15:

“There will be animosity between you and the woman, and between your offspring, and her offspring. He will inflict injury upon your head, and you will inflict injury upon his heel.”

As dismal as our situation may seem, The account of the fall of mankind is not the only story told within the pages of The Bible. In fact much of the Bible is dedicated to the promise of one day making things right, so that those of us who want nothing to do with civilization, will not be forced to conform to it’s precepts.

In order to bring these conditions about, the Bible also repeatedly promises to remove the wicked angels from the vicinity of the Earth, so that those of us, who like Eve, are trusting by nature, will not have to cope with the deception of Satan and his Angels, ever again.

In the creation account recorded at the very beginning of the Bible we are told that when God completed his work, he looked and recognized that everything was very good.(Genesis 1:31) At the very end of the Bible a direct reference to this verse is made at Revelation 21:5 which says, “Look everything is very good again.” In other words, God was pleased with the way things were at mankind’s creation, and at some point in the future God will be equally pleased.

Even though Mankind in general has been tricked into supporting Satan’s Civilization, the Bible repeatedly promises that God will one day rescue mankind and deliver us back into a paradise, just like the one that our ancestors were cast out of. Just like the one Jesus promised to the man executed along side of him.(Luke 23:43) A paradise where natural law will once again be recognized as the only legitimate law.

The Earth will be completely restored. The trees of life will be restored, bringing about an end to the demonic practice of agriculture. The waters of life will be restored. Even the dead shall be restored as promised at verses such as Acts 24:15.

At that time, all living things will once again be obedient to natural law. There will be no more political system, economic system, or religious system. The unnatural hierarchy that currently oppresses mankind will be done away with forever. Satan’s Democracies will be replaced by families.(Barabbas Video)

Please take a moment to think about what I just said. Our ability to understand, just what is required in order to restore our Earth, will be essential, if we want to understand the roll that Melchizedek played in the Bible narrative.

Each and every one of “The Ten Commandments” is absolutely essential to the restoration of paradise.

Most people understand that paradise could never be restored if people were to continue breaking Commandment number 6, which says that we are not to kill, but are not able to understand the significance of commandment number 5, which is the commandment to honor our parents.

Ephesians 6:1-3 which is part of the New Testament, highlights the significance of obedience to the fifth commandment, when it says:

“Children be obedient to your parents in the LORD for this is right. The first commandment with a promise is to honor your parents so that it may go well with you, and your life on the Earth, may be extended indefinitely.”

This is a direct reference to Deuteronomy 5:16, which is in the Old Testament.

Both of the words used at these verses, timao (Strong’s G5091), and kabad (Strong’s H3513), translate properly as “have deep respect”. These words are used to describe how we should feel about many people that are not our parents.

John 5:23 says:

“All men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.”

But it isn’t just our God, our Savior, and our parents that we should honor. At 1Timothy 5:3 we are even told to honor widows.

But the honor that we are commanded to have for our parents is unique. This is emphasized at the beginning of the passage.

“Children be obedient to your parents.”

As translated it would seem that this verse is specifically intended for young children. But the original Greek word used here is teknon (Strong’s G5043), which can mean anyone under the authority of another.

This word is used throughout the New Testament to mean the citizens of a nation, or the members of a tribe, and very obviously, primarily, the adult citizens of a nation and adult members of a tribe.

The word that is translated as be obedient, is hypakouete (Strong’s G5219) which is used throughout the Bible in describing the obedience that we would give to a king, or the obedience that natural forces such as wind and waves give to God.(Matthew 8:27)

If we stop and think about it, replacing Satan’s artificial hierarchical civilization, with God’s natural hierarchy, of the family would be every bit as important as any of the other 9 commandments. Over the course of this series, you will be shown just how important this commandment is, in ways that I promise you, will be absolutely shocking. What you are about to discover is going to be unlike anything ever presented by any of Civilization’s religions.

Once you hear what I will be revealing, you are going to be wondering why you didn’t figure all of this out on your own. The Religions of The Empire are very effective at disseminating lies, while at the same time concealing truth. This is why, other than myself, no one alive today understands the roll played by Melchizedek. But very soon that will change forever.

Satan realizes that if people were to be allowed to understand the sacred truths contained within the pages of the bible, his entire system of deception would be compromised. Satan’s goal is not to rule over the wicked alone. From the very beginning Satan has craved the devotion of everyone alive.

Hopefully you will be one of the privileged few who will take in this information in it’s entirety, recognize it for what it is, and understand completely the roll played by Melchizedek. I promise you, that you will not be disappointed once you finally realize that our father is revealing sacred truths to us, that The Churches have been struggling to keep hidden for thousands of years.

If we truly wish to observe the first commandment of only being obedient to The True God, then we must be willing to obey each and every one of the other commandments.

Unlike Eve who was tricked into craving self rule, we must be willing to reject that desire, and recognize the superiority of following our instincts, God’s natural law, the ten commandments.

God established family heads as his chosen rulers. Any form of hierarchical system outside of that arrangement would go against God’s natural law.

Only by tracing our ancestry biologically, can we be part of God’s family tree. As Luke 3:38 brings out our biological father Adam was the biological son of God. All other hierarchical arrangements lead back to the serpent god Satan.

When Abraham encountered Melchizedek, he was living as close to that natural law as any man could. As parents Sarah and Abraham were the recognized heads of their family. In ancient Hebrew, they were called Iysh (Strong’s H376) and Ishshah (Strong’s H802). In most instances, our English translations of the Bible render these words improperly, as husband and wife, or man and woman.

The English language has no corresponding word for either of these two titles because in Western culture, what they represent no longer exists. However, it is possible to define these two words.

In English Iysh would translate as “Male Tribal Leader” and Ishshah would translate as “Leader of the Male Tribal Leader”.

Prior to being called out of Ur Abraham and Sarah would have been obedient to the leaders of their tribe. What we today would call an extended family.

These two titles are also used to describe the rolls of Adam and Eve, which is why Satan chose not to approach Adam, the Tribal Leader, but instead, Eve, the Leader of the Tribal Leader. As 1Timothy 2:14 records, it was not Adam who was deceived, but Eve.

Adam was simply doing as told by his Ishshah. Since Adam and Eve were in effect brother and sister, both would have been required to be obedient to their father, God. However it could be said that since Eve was created from Adam’s rib, that she should have recognized Adam as her biological father.(1Corinthians 11:8) In any case it cannot be denied that humans ruling over humans has caused much suffering, Even King Solomon near the end of his life admitted to the failure of human self rule.(Ecclesiastes 8:9)

“I have contemplated everything that I have observed being done under the sun. During this time humans ruling over humans has caused nothing but harm.”

Like Adam and Eve, Abraham and Sarah were brother and sister. Although they had different mothers, both had the same father, and would have become the tribal leaders over their family group upon the death of their parents, or would have become family heads upon their separation from the tribe.

The death of Abraham and Sarah’s Grandfather Nahor is recorded at Genesis 11:25 and would have taken place when Abraham was about 49 years old. God asked Abraham to leave his father’s tribe and travel to the promised land, which he and Sarah did when Abraham was 75 years old. At Genesis 11:32 we are told that Abraham’s father Terah died. This would have taken place, when Abraham was about 135 years old.

Abraham’s social status within his tribe may not seem very significant to those of us living in this so called modern age, but as you are about to find out, what he represented would eventually lead to the salvation of all mankind, and within his lifetime would become part of one of the most significant events in all of human history, culminating in the meeting between himself and Melchizedek.

The area of the Earth where Abraham’s tribe resided was known as the land of Canaan. This land was named after one of the first children born after the flood. Canaan’s mother was the Ishshah, or wife, of Ham who was one of the son’s of Noah. According to natural law, Canaan would have automatically been a member of Ham’s tribe. But something happened that would make Canaan’s position according to tribal law unique.

The Bible records that while Noah was drunk, he engaged in some, sexual activity.(Genesis 9:18-29) Although we are not told the exact details, we do know that Ham’s wife, at some point, gave birth to a son named Canaan. The Churches always present this story in such a way as to make it seem as if Canaan was already an adult man when this event took place, but as originally recorded it is more than obvious that Canaan had not yet been born when Noah sinned.

Noah removed Canaan from the family of Ham, and placed him within the tribe of his second born son Shem. The only reasonable explanation for Noah’s decision would be that even thought Canaan was born into the house of Ham, Noah was Canaan’s actual father.

It may sound as if this is just conjecture on my part, but at Genesis 9:24 most English Bibles say “when Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done, he cursed Canaan.

If we are to assume that this verse is translated correctly, then we are going to have to be willing to accept that Noah was either very confused, or a very unjust man.

At the time, his youngest son supposedly was Japheth,(Genesis 10:21) who according to the account had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with any badness that took place. His only involvement in the incident was to help Shem to place a blanket over his father.

Fortunately for us, many ancient manuscripts of The Book of Genesis in the Hebrew language still exist. And when we compare our modern English translations to those ancient text, it quickly becomes apparent that the ancient version of this account, is nothing like our modern language versions.

Several of the original words used are not even remotely related to the words traditionally chosen by The Empire’s translation committees.

When properly rendered into English Genesis 9:24,25 says:

“When Noah sobered up from his wine and sex, he understood that he had made his youngest son Canaan.”

Far from cursing Canaan, the remainder of the account is simply the Bible’s explanation of how Canaan’s tribal affiliation would be unlike that of his brothers, due to the fact that even though, he was the son of Noah, his tribal standing by law, would be as that of the son of Ham.

According to the Bible, Canaan relocated to the promised land, which is why, over time that part of the Earth became known as The Land of Canaan. According to the Bible the people who occupied this area were collectively known as Canaanites. The Ancient Greeks referred to them as the Phoenicians. In our day most people are unaware that the words Phoenician and Canaanite are associated with the same exact people, just according to two different languages.

Natural law is the only law that God ever intended man to live by. The tribal law that Abraham lived by was much closer to God’s natural law than the laws that we live by today. Although Abraham is never called King, there were many living in close proximity to Abraham, that were. And on several occasions Abraham interacted with those kings. It is during one of these encounters that we are introduced to the character of Melchizedek.

Over time many men and women who were obviously not members of Abraham’s biological family joined Abraham’s group and acknowledged him as the family head. This arrangement may not have been based on a strict adherence to natural law, but since Abraham always acknowledged God as his father, it would have only been natural for others who acknowledged God as their father to want to leave their biological families to become part of Abraham’s tribe.

The timing of events in Abraham’s life that I am about to share with you, are not like anything that you will ever hear from any of The Empire’s religions.

At Genesis 11:26 The Bible says that at 70 years of age, Terah begat Abraham, Nahor, and Haran. This verse does not specify which child was born first, or how much time passed between the births of each child.

There are other verses like this recorded about other Important Bible characters and in each case all of the children mentioned are born in quick succession, one after the other. Likely within a year of one another. But in this particular instance every so called “Christian and Jewish” religion claims that Nahor was born first, and Abraham was born 60 years later. Misrepresenting Abraham’s birth by so many years makes deciphering most of Genesis nearly impossible.

When Abraham was about 58 years old one of the most important events in all of human history took place. But according to most of The Empire’s religions, by the time Abraham was born, this event had already uneventfully come and gone, years earlier. Understanding the significance of this Earth shattering event is vital if we ever hope to get a true grasp of just what The Bible is all about. Satan’s mandate to the churches to keep mankind in spiritual darkness, necessitates that the timing of events following the flood be kept hidden from mankind.

In the beginning there would have been no problem with being obedient to God’s law. Mankind lived in a paradise with everything needed in order to survive. At the time, God would have been the family head of Adam and Eve’s family. But, it’s obvious that conditions would have deteriorated rapidly after they were expelled from the garden of Eden.

The Bible doesn’t actually record much about what life was like prior to the flood, but one thing that would have been easy to recognize, would have been who to honor according to God’s natural law. All genealogies would have led back directly to God.

The Bible doesn’t reveal when Eve died, but it does record the death of Adam. It doesn’t record any of the details about the cause of his death, or how his global family reacted, but it does record that he was 930 years old at the time.

With Adam and Eve dead there would have been a noticeable gap in the family line leading back to God. Their descendants would have become divided into what basically would have been opposing teams. What we today refer to as nations.

There is no firm way of determining the exact date, according to our modern calendars, for events of the ancient past such as Adam’s creation and death, because there are simply too many gaps in world history. I feel that there are enough historic characters mentioned in the Bible to get pretty close, possibly within a hundred years, but for our discussion today it would be best if we use something called the Anno Mundi calendar.

Our current calendar is called the Anno Domini Calendar. Which is Latin for Year of The Lord. Prior to the birth of Jesus, there was the Anno Mundi Calendar, which is Latin for Year of the World. Between the Anno Mundi Calendar and the development of the Anno Donini Calendar was a period of many hundreds of years when no recognized calendar existed.

The Anno Domini Calendar is based on the dating of the birth of Jesus. The Anno Mundi Calendar is based on the dating of the Creation of Adam.

Adam would have come into the world in the year 0 Anno Mundi, and died in the year 930 Anno Mundi. Anno Mundi is usually abbreviated as AM.

According to the Anno Domini Calendar, Adam would have been created somewhere around the year 3965 BC. His death would have occurred somewhere around 3035 BC. But as I said earlier, there is no way to be sure, and in fact the dating of Adam’s creation varies wildly among the conflicting religions of mankind.

Within the Christian faith Adam’s creation is usually believed to have taken place somewhere between 4,000 BC and 10,000 BC. And even thought this allows for a 6,000 year period of uncertainty, the difference is nearly insignificant when compared to the differences that have been expressed over the years, by the conflicting sects of the religion of science, which date the appearance of mankind somewhere between 500,000 BC, and 3.5 million BC. A period of uncertainty of about three million years.

Since 4,000 years of human history passed before the time covered by the Anno Domini Calendar, we would have to date all events from the Old Testament as “Before Christ”, which would require us to count backwards. The AM calendar will make understanding the information that I am going to share, much easier to follow.

All of Genesis Chapter 14 is about a Great war that took place within the area known as The Promised Land. This war would have easily qualified as a world war, since such a large percentage of the Earth’s population at that time was involved. Many Kings who participated in the war are mentioned by name. We are told at verses 1 and 2

“In the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of Goiim, these kings made war with Bera king of Sodom, Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar).

Abraham stands apart from the other participants in this war, in that he is never spoken of as a king, and in fact, initially, does not even seem to be interested in getting involved. But at verse 13 we are told that several of Abraham’s allies who had escaped the war, made their way to Abraham in order to inform him that his nephew had been kidnapped.

It is at this point in the story that all of the pieces start coming together, making it possible for us to start figuring out what is actually going on.

All of the first four kings are said to come from outside of the promised land, from an area of the Earth known as Shinar. The country of two rivers.

Ur, the city of Abraham’s origin was also located in that part of the Earth. Prior to leaving Ur, Abraham’s family would have been part of the same group of nations, that we today think of as The Babylonian Empire.

The 5 kings that are at war with the first four kings are all said to rule over nations within the promised land. They too would likely have come from Shinar. After Noah’s ark came to rest on dry ground, the very first mention of men building cities involves a man named Nimrod, who built several cities within the territory known as Shinar. The most well known being Babylon.

In The Bible all personal names are words that had meanings in the languages that the people named would have spoken. Abraham’s name when he left Ur was Abram, which means exalted father. After entering the promised land God changed his name to Abraham, which means father of many people.

Lot, the name of Abraham’s nephew means covering. The names of the men that brought the news of Lot’s kidnapping, also have meaning in the Hebrew language.

Abraham’s Great Great Great Great Grandfather was named Eber, and according to Genesis 10:25, it is from him that all Hebrew people descended. The word Hebrew, is an English rendering of the ancient Hebrew word Eber. According to Genesis 10:32 all of the nations that exist on Earth today had their origins from the list of patriarchs found at Genesis Chapter 10. This chapter of the Bible is often referred to as The Table of Nations.

That being the case, we can assume that the two men that told Abraham about his nephew being kidnapped were also descendants of Eber, because their names are in the Hebrew language, just like Abram’s name. Eber as he is called in most English translations of the Bible, was himself a descendant of Shem. (Gen 11:10-14)

Genesis 14:13 calls these men Abraham’s confederates, or allies, but the original Hebrew words used in this verse are Baal and Beriyth. Baal means dominant god, or god by agreement, and beriyth means covenant, or two way legal agreement. These Hebrew speaking men were in a covenant with Abraham by default, because they were all in a covenant with the same god. They were not really confederates, or allies, they were simply members of Abraham’s extended family. What in our modern day would be called a tribe or nation. They were all descendants of Eber.

The 4 Kings attacking the promised land from Shinar and it’s outlying providences, all have names as well, but their names are of uncertain origin. It is obvious that they are not Hebrew.

Coming from the land of Shinar we would expect that their names would be according to the Chaldean language, what some reference works call Aramaic, or what we might refer to as Babylonian, but that isn’t the case either. These Kings coming from Shinar, are not speaking any language associated with Shinar. This fact is key to understanding just why this war is being fought, as well as the timing of this war.

The other King’s said to be living within the promised land have names that are similar to Hebrew words but not identical. According to the scriptures, these kings were descendants of Canaan. Which would explain the reason why their language is so closely related to the language of Abraham. Previously, Noah had removed Canaan from the family of Ham and assigned him to the family of Shem. Shem was Eber’s Great Grandfather.

This account is about a war between peoples speaking at least three different languages.

The differences in the languages of the people involved, as well as the timing of events, is going to be critical in revealing why everyone is at war. Abraham’s roll in this war. And the identity of Melchizedek.

Abraham was born after the global deluge known as Noah’s flood. When Noah and his three sons and their wives entered the ark there would have been no question as to who was the ruler of the ark. It was obviously God. It was he who instructed Noah to build the ark. It was he who brought the flood. It was even God who shut up the ark after everyone was on board.(Genesis 7:16)

But there was also an obvious hierarchy that would have been recognized. Everyone on the Ark was part of a family. And Noah was very obviously the head of the family according to natural law.

When Abraham was born, his father was Terah. Abraham lived within the tribe of his father all the way up to the day when he left his father’s house in order to travel to the promised land. (Genesis 12:1)

Abraham’s Grandfather Nahor was also still living. And it is recorded in the Bible that Nahor, Terah, and Abraham all dwelt together making Nahor the actual family head, if in fact there were no older family members within the Abraham’s tribe.

Even if no older family members were dwelling within Nahor’s house, Natural law would dictate that Nahor have honor for his elders. After Noah’s family departed the ark, and separated into families, Noah would still have been the recognized family head, of everyone alive on the Earth.

Genesis Chapter 5 is a part of the Bible that along with chapter 11 is a list all of Abraham’s ancestors along with the timing necessary to determine when they were born, and when they died.

It is this list of Abraham’s ancestors that will allow us to determine what was happening when he entered The Promised Land. I have broken down this information into an easy to follow chart, including all of the verses necessary for anyone interested in looking up the information for themselves.

Every so called “Bible Based” religion that I am aware of agrees with my interpretation of the timing of events all the way up to Abraham’s birth with the exception of a 2 year disagreement at the birth of Shem, which is easy enough to straighten out by carefully reading the Bible account about the dates associated with Noah, Shem, The Flood, and the birth of Shem’s son Arphaxad.

At Genesis 11:26 we are told that “after Terah had lived 70 years, he became the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran”,as I said earlier. But, the verse does not say which was born first, or how much time passed between their births. What I am about to tell you is pure Bible truth, but according to the cults of Judaism and Christianity, what I am about to tell you is utter heresy, but there are verses that expose the teachings of the Churches as outright lies even if we choose to ignore the vague chronology of Genesis11:26.

At Genesis 17:15-17, God informed Abraham that he was going to have a son. Abraham’s reaction was to “fall down on his face laughing, and saying to himself, can a child be born to a hundred year old man?”

Obviously, such a thing would be extremely unusual in our day, but what about in Abraham’s day. According to The Bible people did live much longer in the ancient past, but we really don’t have any direct scriptural references to how late in life a man could expect to continue producing offspring. But there are many references to the ages of many men when they beget children.

Prior to the flood Methuselah is reported to have had a son named Lamech when he was 187 years old. This is the oldest recorded age of any man to reproduce offspring, and the Bible says that Methuselah lived for a total of 969 years during which time, he had other sons and daughters. (Genesis 5:25,26)

But it is common Bible knowledge that people born after the flood lived much shorter lives, than those who lived prior to the flood, so the age at which a man could expect to continue reproducing offspring would obviously have dropped off as well. Other than Abraham himself, after the flood, the oldest recorded age of any man in the entire text of the Bible, having offspring would be that of Abraham’s father Terah, at 70 years old. The varying sects of Judaism, and Christianity all teach that Abraham was not born in 1948AM, but in 2008AM, 60 years later. According to Civilization’s religions, Terah would have had to have been 130 years old when Abraham was born.

If Abraham’s own father would have had a son at 130, as is taught by the churches, there is no way that Abraham would have laughed at the thought of a man having a son at a mere 100 years of age. Scripturally there is no way around the fact that Abraham could not have been born when his father was 130 years old.

Melchizedek in the Old Testament is not so much a name as a title. In fact Melchizedek isn’t even a word, but in fact two words. Melek (Strong’s H4428) meaning king, and tsedeq (Strong’s H6663) meaning rightful.

According to the religions of the Empire Melchizedek means King of Righteousness, whatever that is. But according to the Hebrew language Melchizedek means “Rightful King” or “My Rightful King”. This can be confirmed by comparing this verse to the Greek Text of Hebrews 7:2 which calls Melchizedek, Basileus (Strong’s G935) Dikaiosyne (Strong’s G1343) which once again, means Rightful King, only this time, in the Greek language. According to Strong’s Exhaustive Concordence, Dikaiosyne means “The state of him who is as he ought to be.” Rightful. As in Rightful King. The one who is King because he ought to be king.

The reason that the Churches try to confuse us about the date of Abraham’s birth has to do with determining who the oldest living ancestor of Abraham would have been during his sojourn in the promised land. By lying about the date of Abraham’s birth, the Churches are able to put things just enough out of sync, to conceal the basic overall theme of the Bible. Which of course, once again, is the War between God’s Kingdom and Satan’s Empire.

I already said that Abraham’s father and grandfather were still alive when he was born, but even more amazing than that, the father of all Hebrews, Eber was still alive. When Abraham was born, Eber would have been 225 years old. In fact all of Abraham’s ancestors would have still been alive all the way back to his Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Grandfather.

Abraham’s oldest living ancestor would have been 892 years old at the time, and very obviously, the only man that could have been deserving of the honor and obedience due according to God’s natural law, to honor your father and mother. Abraham’s Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Great, Grandfather was Noah.

Understanding that the Churches have been intentionally lying for thousands of years about the timing of Abraham’s birth, when he entered the promised land, and when he died, might not have seemed like a big deal initially. But once you realize that Abraham and Noah lived at the same time you should be able to come to the conclusion, on your own, that this information is not as trivial as one might think. The actual date of Abraham’s birth would have put him right in the middle of one of the greatest power struggles in all of human history.

Abraham was born in a world where no human had ever died, and yet, in the course of his life, he found himself thrust right into the middle of a world war. A war that would obviously have caused the deaths of thousands. That war would involve many significant Bible events that the Churches do not want you to find out about.

When the Churches tell you about the table of nations, Abram’s being called out of Ur, the fall of Nimrod’s Empire and confusion of the languages, The meeting between Abram, and Melchizedek, and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, they always make it seem as if these events took place hundreds of years apart, as if they are all completely unrelated.

And even worse than that, the Churches completely ignore the deaths of Eber, and Noah. Two of the most significant events in all of human history. No one can understand all of the events that took place at that time if they don’t understand how they relate to the deaths of these two historic figures.

As you are about to find out, all of these individual Bible stories are actually different aspects of a single event. The true story of what happened at the meeting between Abram and Melchizedek is about to be revealed to mankind for the first time in many thousands of years.

If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.

SustenanceNCovering Intro 2018

Hello, and welcome to my YouTube Channel. If this is your first time here, then I probably need to tell you a little bit about myself. What I talk about here, is not going to be like anything that you have ever heard before.

Unlike the vast majority of Civilization’s citizens, I do not simply watch what everyone else is saying and try to say something similar sounding, in order to fit in.

When I speak, it is always straight from my heart. It is always, what I mean to say. And it always represents what I actually think as a real person. I never use the precious gift of communication as a tool for manipulating others.

I, unlike the vast majority of people have the capacity to actually love people based on nothing more than the fact that I was designed by God to instinctively do so.

That being said, it must be acknowledged that those whom we love are very obviously not always loving us back. In fact over the years, I have been shown over and over again, that those whom we love the most often pose the greatest threat to our well being.

At Matthew10:34-36 Jesus is reported to have described it this way:

“Think not that I am come to bring peace to the Earth. I came not to bring peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s enemies shall be those of his own household.”

And at John 15:20:

“Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my sayings, they will keep yours also.”

Members of Christianity’s conflicting sects will often point to these verses, as proof that they are doing God’s will. And it cannot be denied that the so called Christian nations have, for the most part, been engaged in nonstop carnal warfare from their earliest beginnings.

But if we look at history with an open mind, we will see that nearly every attack against members of the Christian faith has been retaliatory. In other words the nations claiming to be Christian have an undeniable, long standing history of invading neighboring territories, and striking the first blow, in their quests for world domination.

Jesus never killed anyone. If we read the Bible account of Jesus life, he was very obviously not tortured to death, for fighting, but for refusing to fight. As everyone around him was actively participating in what would eventually result in the destruction of Jerusalem, Jesus was traveling the land teaching a message of peace. It is this message of peace that eventually led to Jesus’ execution.

Throughout the last 2,000 years of human history, The Nations of Christendom have amassed more blood guilt than all other nations combined. As time goes on, there is no reason to imagine that there will ever come a day when Christians will come to their senses and stop murdering their brothers and sisters.

But in recent years, those who love God, and love their fellow man, have begun to wake up to the insidiously evil nature of religion, and have chosen to disassociate themselves from the filth of all of mankind’s cults.

I spent the first 40 years of my life involved in Civilization’s organized belief systems, searching desperately for people like myself. People who instinctively understood that something was seriously wrong with how our world works, but were afraid to say anything out of fear of being abused.

As a member of several churches, I found myself under constant attack. But it was always my fellow Christians that were doing the attacking.

I eventually began to look at religions outside of Christianity for loving people who were instinctively doing God’s will. In particular, those that were receiving the brunt of Christendom’s brutality, but was able to see in the members of those faiths, the same selfish, hateful tendencies that I witnessed within the religions of Christianity.

When I started this YouTube Channel, I did so in the hopes of finding others like myself. People who instinctively understood, that the way that our world functions is evil, and that religion was an integral part of convincing others to participate in that evil.

Very soon this way of doing things will be done away with forever. As Isaiah5:20 says:

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”

You may find this hard to believe, but Earth wide there are literally thousands of people like me (and perhaps like you) who refuse to degrade themselves by struggling to achieve some kind of position in this wicked Empire’s hierarchy.

Members of the cults of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and all of the Earth’s other religious systems are beginning to question the beliefs that they have looked to for spiritual support for their entire lives.

I believe that the vast majority of people who occupy this planet, want the truth, but simply are not willing to give up whatever lies define who they think they are as a person.

Another problem with our search for truth, is that we are bombarded from the moment that we wake up till the moment that we fall back to sleep with well presented information designed to manipulate each and every one of us into into believing that if we simply stick to the plan, everything’s going to work out just fine.

I’m here to tell you, that sticking to the plan, is not going to work. Everything that you have ever known, is about to get very very not fine.

Another obstacle to our quest for truth, is that our current access to information is always presented by some kind of short haired, clean shaven, suit wearing, SUV driving, spokes-model for the Empire.

In all of human history, God has never once used any such vile creature as any kind of mediator between himself and his human children.

For some reason, most never question the integrity of such people, despite the fact that none of us has ever, in our life, met an honest person that would fit such a description.

A very real obstacle to anyone seeking truth is the artificial hierarchy known as civilization. Another word for artificial is fake. But unlike most fake things, disobedience to this fiction, brings with it deprivation, maltreatment, and ostracism.

Very few would ever think to question our situation due to the fact, that we are all trained from birth to recognize our place, in the current social order, and simply accept that everyone is exactly where they deserve to be. Including ourselves.

That being the case, nobody ever listens to the guy at the bottom of Civilization’s high and mighty pyramid scheme.

Most are so busy staring admiringly up at the short haired clean shaven, suit wearing guy way up at the tippy top, that they aren’t even aware that there is a guy on the bottom. You are not likely to see the guy on the bottom wearing a suit, or any other such nonsensical costume.

At Matthew11:8 Jesus had this to say about the appearance of John The Baptist, and in fact the appearance of all who are sent by God:

“But, what did you go out to see? Were you expecting to see someone wearing fine clothing? If you are looking for someone like that, you should look in the palaces of the kings.”

At the time when he said this, Jesus was not anywhere near the top of Civilization’s pyramid. Jesus knew what he was talking about from personal experience. The few that were willing to listen to Jesus were right down there at the bottom with him.

As a human being, I have always felt a closeness to everyone that is a member of my own species. It is only through trial and error, that I have figured out that sharing precious truth with just anyone can be dangerous.

To once again quote Jesus as recorded at Matthew7:6:

“Cast not, your pearls before swine.”

Now, getting back to what I do here on this channel. I teach truth. I only teach truth. I never attempt to manipulate anybody into any kind of religious agenda. And best of all, unlike the teaching of Satan’s cults, everything that I post can be easily proven using nothing more than your eyes, and your ears, and a little common sense.

Just to give you a sense of what you will learn, should you choose to pay attention to the things that I am sharing with people, I will explain the single most important thing that you will ever need to know, should you decide to look into what the Bible teaches for yourself.

Most people believe that the Bible is some kind of rule book for achieving some kind of heavenly reward, but I knew even from the very first time that I read the Bible, as a teenager, that, that was not the case.

If you do ever decide to read the Bible for yourself, and remember what I am telling you today, you will recognize that what I am saying is 100% true. The Bible is nothing at all like what your priest, pastor, elder, preacher, rabbi, or imam has been telling you.

For a fact, the Bible is simply a written history of the war between God’s Kingdom, and Satan’s Empire. This war is also spoken of in the Bible as the war between Creation, and Civilization, and often as the war between the righteous angels and the wicked angels.

Just this one little piece of knowledge will benefit you immensely the next time that you are desperately searching the Bible, for those passages, about gambling, sex, drugs, and rock and roll, that your pastor has been talking about for all these years. The Bible is not a catalog of inconsequential, religious, nonsense.

Once you begin to see the undeniable, repeating pattern that I am talking about, you will not only recognize that the Bible indeed is about the war between God’s Kingdom, and Satan’s Empire, but you will be able to make an informed decision as to which side you want to be on, in this war.

Galatians Chapter 5 describes the two opposing teams, as those who are minding the flesh, and those who are filled with the spirit.

To put that in modern English, as originally recorded in Greek, those who are minding the flesh are selfish people. Those who are filled with the spirit, are those who place the needs of others as equal to or greater than their own needs.

Each and every one of us may think of ourselves as a little bit of both, but over time, I have come to realize that most people are very obviously, exceptionally selfish, while others stand out as being exceptionally giving. There isn’t as much gray area as one might think.

According to God’s word, the Bible, each and every one of Satan’s children is filled with an unclean spirit. Before any of us can be filled with the Holy Spirit, we have to be willing to physically separate ourselves from every source of spiritual contamination that civilization has in place.

Over the course of the last decade or so, I have been given much information to share with humanity that has been concealed from our ancestors, by the churches for thousands of years. I suspect that God will continue to use me in this capacity all the way up until Christ’ return.

Should someone else be given this responsibility, I will stop producing videos, and start watching the videos produced by my replacement.

I am not the King of America, nor am I the High Priest of Christianity. I am just what I look like. An old man, living at the end of a dirt road, on a piece of land that usually holds standing water. I am about as much of a social outcast as a man can be without actually being homeless.

I don’t just spend all my time posting videos about all of the secrets of the universe. I am still a human being struggling to stay alive on this planet, and much of what I post is the everyday stuff that I have to do in my regular life. The kind of stuff that anyone would talk about with their friends.

Those who willingly listen to my teachings, are my friends, and so it is appropriate that I tell them about my day.

Obviously my passion is for truth, and so if you start coming here on a regular basis to watch me maintain my land, or plant trees, you need to know in advance, that, that is not all that I do.

You will hear truth. And the truth that you will hear, will be based on things that you can observe for yourself, combined with the teachings of the ancient past, Primarily, but not limited to those of the Bible.

Right now, it is very important that you listen to me and listen carefully. When I speak of truth, I am speaking of something that the Bible calls “Mysteries”. (Colossians 1:26) Some English Bibles render this word as “Sacred Secrets”.

Most of what I have been sharing with people, as I have already said, has not been heard by human ears for many thousands of years. If you keep up with this channel, those sacred secrets, which to this day are still secret, need not remain secret to you.

Please do not imagine that what I do is anything like what you have seen done before. I am not just some guy filming himself out in the woods talking about his personal opinions. Nor am I sharing information that you cannot confirm for yourself.

Soon enough, events are going to start taking place, here on Earth, that your mind is simply not going to be able to process. If you are willing to listen, I can help you get through this.

If you were expecting God to assign some kind of theologian to this task, you’re probably not buying, whatever it is that you think I’m selling.

I can promise you this. God will not be sending someone more to your liking. For now, I am pretty much all you got. Even if I should be replaced, I am certain that my replacement will be every bit as socially unacceptable as I am. Right now you should be thinking of me as your final warning.

Should you be undecided about who’s side you want to take in this war between God’s Kingdom, and Satan’s Empire, just know that the opposing team is already putting together a strategy for dealing with the things that I am teaching.

Their champion will soon be taking his position. He won’t be dressed anything like me, and nothing out of his mouth will sound like anything that you will ever hear coming out of my mouth. If you have some kind of emotional attachment to modern life, then it is likely that you will be much more comfortable listening to him than you will ever be, listening to me.

Posted on this channel, are literally hundreds of videos very much like this one, produced by me.

They have been viewed millions of times by thousands of people speaking hundreds of languages. Living in over 200 countries.

I have ahead of me an extraordinary task, with very little time left to see it through.

If you don’t want to survive……….. don’t listen to me.

How Many Animals Were On Noah’s Ark?

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be about the significance of the numbers of animals that Noah was commanded to bring onto the ark.

I have explained in several of my videos that at 1Corinthians 4:9 Paul felt that he, as well as other Bible characters were somehow being used as actors in a great theatrical exhibition. As recorded in the Bible:

“For I think that God has exhibited us apostles as men sentenced to death, as the final part of a great theatrical exhibition, to the world, to angels, and to humans.”

The repeating pattern of similar stories found throughout the Bible often make it easy to see which Bible personalities were participating in Paul’s theatrical production, as well as what they represented. However in many instances, who is portraying what is often difficult to determine.

Noah’s roll in this great theatrical spectacle, can only be fully understood if we think deeply about information regarding the flood that Satan’s cults have been keeping hidden from mankind for thousands of years.

When Noah entered the ark he had on board every living thing that would be required in the new world that would be established once the flood was over. In our English Bibles the word used to distinguish the animals from one another is “KIND”.

This word is actually rendered from the Hebrew word miyn, which is Strong’s H4327. This word is never used to describe inanimate objects. In other words we would not use the word miyn to describe different kinds of tools, or different kinds of houses. Miyn could only be properly used to describe living things.

In English many imagine that this word might be more like our English word species, than our English word kind, but not necessarily. No document from the ancient past has ever been found that clearly defines what a kind might be, so we can only guess at what would qualify an animal as unique according to the Hebrew word miyn.

Although the Ancient Hebrew word that we translate as kind might be translated as species, it might also be properly translated as breed, or as in the case of humans….. race.

Not knowing how to define the word that we translate as kind in these verses has caused quite a bit of confusion. To this day, the religions based on creation have been arguing with the religions based on evolution over how many species would have to have been brought on board the ark, in order to preserve life through the flood.

This video is not going to be about that, but I will say this just to give you something to think about. As translated into English, it seems as if Noah was commanded to build the ark himself, out of Gopher Wood, and to fill it with animals himself, and make provisions for feeding the animals himself. But as recorded in the earliest original language texts, this way of thinking about the account is probably not accurate.

Even though the commands about building and filling the ark were obviously directed at Noah, there are other verses that suggest that the ark was actually built by God, and filled with animals by god. The Bible even says that once the animals were on board, it was God who shut the door. To argue over how such an impossible task was accomplished would serve no purpose. As the religions of Science, and Christianity are busy arguing over how many animals will fit in a box, nobody seems to be arguing over how a human being could convince all of the species of animals on the planet to go into the box.

In any case, there are some details about the construction of the Ark, as recorded in Hebrew that do not match the details as translated into English. Genesis 6:14 says:

“Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.”

All English translations follow this pattern as originally rendered into Latin by the Catholic Church, but there are some serious problems with this rendering.

First off, there have never been found any documents, from any culture, from the ancient past, about Gopher trees. It is as if Gopher trees were driven to extinction by Noah’s carpentry project. And even the use of the word wood is somewhat questionable. The actually word used is ets, Strong’s H6086. Ets is the Hebrew word that coincides with our English word tree.

There are many Bible verses that use the word ets when describing what would likely be lumber, but most verses that use this word are very obviously describing living trees. Some uses of the word are obviously about the shape of living trees, in other words things that branch out. It is only through examining the text that we can determine if the word ets is describing trees, the shape of trees, or lumber.

One of the reasons that I am not comfortable with translating the phrase ets gopher as gopher wood is because there are three words that are very similar to one another in this single verse, and none of the three are used anywhere else in the Bible the way that the translators use them in this passage. Gopher, Strong’s H1613, Kopher, Strong’s H3724, and Kaphar Strong’s H3722.

There are other ancient versions of the Bible that use different Hebrew words at this verse, but they are all similar, and seem to be based on ancient words meaning container, covering, case, or box. We have similar words in English. A coffer is a box for storing valuables. A coffin is a box for burying the dead.

A more accurate translation of Genesis 6:14 might be:

“Make thee an ark with rooms of containers branching out, and make the ark with containers within and containers without.”

If we keep in mind that a room is just another type of container, and an ark is just another container, this verse could very easily be translated as, “Make a container and place within it, branches of containers, within branches of containers, within branches of containers.”

It must be understood that I do not have the resources nor the expertise, to prove that my rendering is accurate, perhaps it is every bit as inaccurate as what is recorded in our English translations of the Bible, but I can promise you this. Noah’s ark was not any kind of giant floating log cabin covered with tar, on the outside, and covered with tar on the inside.

Engaging in any kind of scientific debate over what is obviously a miraculous act of God, especially based on the very limited information available in the Genesis account would be foolish.

However, we can use the Bible to get a better understanding of the kinds of animals that were on the ark during Noah’s flood. In our modern day, there are some very strict rules, that have been put in place, which must be followed by those who have been given the task of determining when a living thing is a unique species.

The current rules set forth by the religion of biology may not be the same as the rules that would be followed within the pages of the Bible for determining which animals qualify as a unique miyn, or kind.

As commanded by God two different types of animal were led on board. Clean animals, and Unclean animals.

According to many religions, clean animals are those that were to be sacrificed or eaten, and unclean animals are those that were not to be sacrificed or eaten. I produced a video about that subject years ago, and will not be repeating that information in this video. However I will say this: There is no evidence to indicate that Noah ever imagined that he would be sacrificing or eating the animals that God had commanded him to preserve.

The words clean and unclean as used in the Bible are usually associated with the spirits that inhabited the different species of animals, including humans. Many of the unclean spirits, spoken of in the Bible are also called wicked spirits, and in some instances demons.

Separating the animals into these two divisions served a purpose that God has never revealed to mankind, until now. Please try to grasp the significance of what you are about to hear, and keep in mind that God is not using one of the Empire’s Theologians to tell you these things. He is using a long haired, social outcast, living in a deteriorating, homemade structure, surrounded by swamp land.

No one, to my knowledge has ever explained how the numbers associated with the clean and unclean animals brought on board Noah’s ark were to be understood in regard to man.

If you ask someone how many animals were brought on board the ark, most will simply say two of each kind. As is recorded at Genesis 7:9:

“As God had commanded Noah, two by two came unto Noah. Two by two entered into the ark. Male and Female”

While it is true that God commanded that the animals be brought on board in pairs, Genesis 7:2 says that the clean animals were to be brought on board in pairs, and in groups of seven.

“Take with you seven by seven of all kinds of clean animals. A male with it’s female. And two of every kind of unclean animal a male with it’s female.”

Mathematically this does not work out. Seven cannot be divided by two.

As recorded this information does not make any sense. We should understand that there has to be something about this illogical mathematical arrangement that is significant.

If you ask someone how many humans were brought on board the ark, many people would count up the members of Noah’s family and conclude that the number of humans brought on board was eight.

Think about what this means. If groups of two were considered unclean, and groups of seven were considered clean, then we should be asking ourselves what would a group of eight be?

All English translations of the Bible at Genesis 7:13, clearly state that the humans who entered the Ark where Noah and his wife. Shem and his wife. Ham and his wife. And Japheth and his wife. Four groups of two.

If we keep in mind that clean animals were brought on board in groups of seven, and unclean animals were brought on board in groups of two, then the humans who entered the ark would have to have been considered unclean when they entered. Keep in mind that we have no way of knowing what criteria God uses for determining a creatures kind. And it may not even be God’s criteria that is involved.

Life after the flood quickly became as bad for Noah and his family as life had been before the flood. Within Noah’s lifetime human beings began to engage in carnal warfare over rulership of the Earth. A major portion of this war concluded when Abraham defeated the nations that kidnapped his nephew Lot. It was at the conclusion of this part of the war that Abraham came into contact with the recognized rightful king and priest known as Melchizedek. According to Genesis Chapter 10 those involved in this first world war, formed up into groups according to family lineage.

In chapter 11 of Genesis we are told that shortly after this war for world domination began the languages of mankind became confused. What the Churches have never revealed is that according to Bible Chronology, the date on which the confusion of the languages took place is almost certainly the date on which Noah died. I’ll be covering this subject more in depth very soon. Please be patient.

All of the Earth’s inhabitants, even in our day are categorized as black, white, or Asian. The official scientific designations being Negroid, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid. Human beings, although all children of Noah still, for the most part, form up into alliances based on the nonsensical belief that human beings are different according to their kinds.

The original three families that descended from Noah, eventually grew, and divided into hundreds of families known in our day as nations. And even within those nations there are divisions based on skin color, political party, social status, language, and religion.

The war that began in Noah’s day still rages on. The officially recognized artificial divisions of mankind that we refer to as race, is still to this day based on the three races of the three sons of Noah. The pairs of humans that entered the Ark continue to exist as unclean beasts to this day. As long as selfish human beings are unable to recognize all of the races and nationalities of mankind as a single family, mankind will continue to be unclean in the eyes of God.

Try to understand what I am saying. The ancient Hebrew word miyn which is translated as kind, could be used to describe humans as a unique species, or it could be used to describe humans as three unique races. If someone believes that the different races of mankind shouldn’t interbreed than such a person would have to accept that when the four human pairs entered the ark, that they entered as 4 unique, unclean, kinds.

But, if we think of Noah’s relationship with those who entered the ark, and compare it to God’s relationship with humanity, then we have to look at everything that Noah did as somehow related to things that God did.

Noah did not bring eight people on board the Ark. His roll as the preserver of life was unique. If we add up the number of humans that Noah rescued from the flood, the total is actually seven. But that would only be true if we as humans willingly recognize Noah as the preserver of all life on this planet and as the family head of a single unique family. By accepting the responsibility of preserving life through the flood, Noah became separate and above all of the creatures that he rescued.

God’s law, which we today call the Ten Commandments demands that we honor our father and mother. When the descendants of Noah began to kill one another they were doing so as part of a struggle for world domination. Anyone willing to kill their brothers and sisters in a contest to overthrow their parents would obviously not be honoring them.

When Noah’s family entered the Ark it is likely that they understood their rolls as well as the roll of Noah. They would have recognized that as Noah was bringing the clean kinds of living things on board the ark in groups of seven, that they themselves were also being brought on board the ark by Noah, as a group of seven. They would have understood that they each had a clean standing before God. They would not have perceived any of their family members as different kinds of living things.

It was only when different branches of the family began to consider themselves to be racially superior, that selfishness began to be the dominant motivation for the activities of Noah’s descendants.

If we think of Noah’s roll as preserver of life in relationship to God, the true preserver of life, then we would have to acknowledge Noah as the family head of a single unique family. There is no denying that Noah is the father of each and every one of us, Just as God is the father of each and every one of us. Those who have convinced themselves that the varieties of characteristics that exist within the human population can be used to divide people according to their race, are by default declaring themselves to be unclean beasts.

It is as if they consider themselves as a race to be their own unique species, different and above every other species of man. According to the Hebrew language, a unique miyn.

No matter what characteristics Noah’s sons had that would have made them different, or what characteristics made the wives of Noah’s sons different, they certainly would not have considered one another members of 3 different species.

Malachi 2:10 puts it this way:

“Do we not all have one Father? Did not one God create all of us? Why do we profane the covenant of our ancestors by being unfaithful to one another?”

Obviously this verse is about all of mankind. Not just about the Jews. Humanity has one father. God created us all. He did not just create one kind of human, and not create the rest.

Romans 12:5 puts it this way:

“In Christ we who are many, are one body, and each member belongs to one another.”

In the very near future, every human alive on this planet is going to understand exactly what Romans 12:5 is actually about. Not just the Christians, Not just those who go around bragging about being saved, not just those who have experienced the imaginary transformation of being born again.

Currently, I am the only man alive that understands what it means to be “in Christ”. But between now and the day when everyone understands it, I will be willingly sharing that information with everyone who will listen. Please be patient. It will not be long before I reveal this sacred secret to all of mankind.

If we read the account of the war that concluded with the meeting between Abraham and Melchizedek, we will notice that none of Noah’s sons was involved. Bible chronology makes it clear that the meeting took place after Noah’s death, while his sons were very likely, still alive. The only mention of Shem, Ham, and Japheth is that those involved in the war were their descendants.

Satan’s religions have been teaching for thousands of years that Shem was righteous, and Ham was somehow wicked, even though no support for this assertion exists anywhere in the Bible. Many race supremacists use Bible verses about which nations descended from Ham as support for the righteousness of their genocidal campaigns. The modern day political movement known as Zionism is based on the false belief that God somehow favors one race over another.

You may have noticed in recent times, that The Empire’s propaganda systems have been placing a lot of emphasis on the stability of borders. As the war which led to the meeting between Abraham and Melchizedek continues to rage on, many in fear for their lives are attempting to escape the areas that have been hardest hit by that war. Many are simply seeking a location where their families can be more secure. As they are chased across the borders by soldiers of The Empire, they are often met by citizens of that empire, demanding that they return to their proper places. The places where racially inferior people are suppose to live.

Not everyone who supports Satan’s civilization is an armed combatant. Those who believe in borders, and believe that those borders must be defended will be just as culpable as those who fight the war. Those who participate in the choosing of world leaders will pay a heavy price on The Great Day of God Almighty, when all of the Earth’s political leaders are destroyed for good. When Satan’s Champions take their final stand against God everyone who is following them now, will continue to follow them as they are removed from the Earth.

The descendants of Noah, have been reproducing offspring ever since the ark came to rest on dry ground. In our day, the idea that mankind can still be divided according to race has become for the most part a proven fiction. It should be obvious that each and every human alive today is the descendant of each and every person who was on board the ark. It would be silly to believe that anyone alive today is some kind of pure genetic offspring of any of the three families of Noah’s children.

The families of man that occupied the Earth during Noah’s lifetime, very obviously felt superior to one another. It cannot be denied that in our day most people still feel the same way. The ridiculous belief that people of one race, religion, or nationality are somehow not as good as some other race, religion, or nationality, has led to much human suffering.

Noah lived to see the beginning of the war that mankind is still involved in today. In Noah’s day many who fought in the war, were likely pure bloods, but that does not make what they were fighting for any more reasonable that what people are fighting for now. The nations that started the war were all made up of the descendants of Noah. The people involved in the war today are still all descendants of Noah.

Very soon Christ will return, and when he does, Satan, the god of civilization will be exiled from the Earth, and along with him all of those who put their faith in his ability to grant them the power to be like God. As Psalms 37:10 says:

“A little while, and the wicked will be no more. Though you look for them, they will not be found.”

True to his word, God will soon do away with everyone supporting mankind’s wars of aggression. Those who cry out for the building of walls, and the defending of borders, will be destroyed, likely as victims of the very war that they helped to perpetuate.

Those of us remaining will no longer be walled in by those who feel that they are somehow superior to us. At that point we who love God and love our brothers and sisters, will no longer be kept apart by walls, installed and defended by those patriots, nationalists, and racists, who feel that they are superior to us.

Many of those who belong to the Empire’s religions will be totally taken off guard. Having spent their entire lives patiently awaiting the rapture, they are about to get their wish. Just not in the way that they are currently expecting. Apparently they will be leaving this world two by two, just as the unclean animals entered the ark. Those who recognize that we all have one father can consider ourselves to be the descendants of the seven clean humans that Noah saved.

Please continue paying attention to this channel, as I continue to post more information related to this subject. The religions put in place by Satan thousands of years ago have been very successful at hiding the truth for a very long time. But that time is quickly nearing it’s end.

If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.

Melchizedek Part 1 Who’s Our Father?

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be the first in a brand new series that I am producing called Melchizedek, and the topic of this particular video is going to be the meaning of the word father as used in our Bibles.

When Jesus was asked by the crowds to tell them how they should pray, at Matthew 6:9,10 it is recorded that he told them:

“Pray like this: Our Father who is in the heavens, your name is especially holy. Let your kingdom come. Let your will be done. As in heaven, also upon Earth.”

I know that this may not be how you are use to hearing this verse, but the thought that Jesus was expressing when he spoke can not be translated any more accurately into English.

The point that is going to be important for you to keep in mind as you listen to the remainder of this information, is that Jesus told those in the crowd to pray to God as “Our Father”. Not to his father, not to the father of the crowd, but to our father. The one who is the father of Jesus, as well as the father of those whom Jesus was addressing. At this instance, he made no distinction between his relationship with God, and the relationship of his listeners with God.

According to Mathew 23:9,10, Jesus gave further instructions about how we should feel about our relationship with God.

“And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.”

At this verse, we are told that the only real father that any of us have is God, and according to the verse, the only master that any of us have is Jesus.

The word that gets translated as father in this verse is Pater Strong’s G3962. The Greek word pater is where our English word father comes from.

According to the King James Bible, only Jesus was deserving of being called our master. The word that is translated as master, is Kathegetes Strong’s G2519. Linguistically the word master, doesn’t accurately represent what the word kathegetes means in Attic Greek.

Kathegetes is made up of the two Greek words kata, and hageomai. Kata is one of those words that can mean quite a few things according to variances in the spelling and the surrounding text. It can mean, at, with, along side of, or quite a few other similar things. The second half of this word, hageomai means appointed one. Together the two words, as used at Mathew 23:10 mean one appointed to, as in one appointed to a specific position.

For right now, we don’t need to concern ourselves with the first part of this word, because for our purposes it doesn’t really change anything about the word hageomai which means the appointed one. Plus, quite a few verses use hageomai as a stand alone word to describe prominent people. At Matthew 2:6 the word hageomai is used to describe Jesus without the kata prefix.

“And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Judea, art not the least among the princes of Judea: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.

An appointed one, a hageomai, might be described as a governor, but according to Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, this word could be translated in several other ways. A leader, to lead, to go before, to rule, to command, a prince, or any person appointed by a king, or government, to have authority over others.

If we look at other verses where Jesus used the word father, we will see that he took his own advice. Nowhere in the Bible did he ever call any man his father or his leader, but only spoke of God as his father. That doesn’t mean that Jesus didn’t recognize the authority, or position of our Earthly fathers.

At Matthew 19:19 when asked by a rich man, what a person needed to do in order to have everlasting life, Jesus quoted from “The Ten Commandments” and as part of that, he said:

“Honor your father and mother, and love thy neighbor as yourself.”

Once again, he used the Greek word pater, only this time, he wasn’t talking about our heavenly father, God, but about our fleshly fathers here on Earth.

The Bible makes it clear that Jesus had no fleshly father. Joseph, took Mary in, even though she was already pregnant, because an angel had appeared to Joseph in a dream and told him that Mary was pregnant by Holy Spirit. In effect making God Jesus’ actual father. According to Jesus genealogy many people thought that he was the son of Joseph. As recorded at Luke3:22:

“The Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form, like a dove; and a voice came from heaven saying, You are my beloved Son. With you I am well pleased. When Jesus began his ministry at about 30 years of age, people imagined that he was the son of Joseph”

Hearing God’s voice telling Jesus that he was his son, probably shocked those who heard it. As the verse points out, people had always thought that Jesus was Joseph’s son.

Jesus may have loved Joseph very much. It is even possible that Jesus thought of Joseph as his father. He very likely called Joseph, father. But throughout his ministry none of the writers of any of the New Testament books recorded him doing so.

Every passage where Jesus speaks of his father, he is very obviously speaking of God. But that doesn’t mean that it would be wrong for us to use the word father when speaking of our fleshly fathers.

Jesus, telling the rich man to honor his father and mother, confirms that we are under no obligation to use some different word when speaking of our fleshly fathers. Jesus used the Greek word pater as a title for both our fleshly fathers, and our heavenly father.

But even still our obligations to our parents are not without limits. At Matthew 10:37 Jesus said:

“He that loves his father and mother more than me is not worthy of me.”

There are probably many ways that this teaching could be applied. Primarily, we would never want to do anything that would go against the teachings of Jesus, or our heavenly father, as a means of pleasing our fleshly parents.

Parents will often pressure their children into pursuing high paying careers that work against the divine will. They may expect their children to join some political group, or participate in the family religion. But knowing how God feels about such things, we have to understand that we are under no spiritual obligation to fulfill the desires of our parents, when those desires go against what we know to be right.

If we want to understand what Jesus meant, when he said “Call no man your father, and no man your master” all that we need to do is compare how Jesus, and other righteous men used the words father, and master, to how Jesus enemies and other wicked people used the words father and master. In particular how they used the Greek words pater, and hageomai.

We’ve already established that Jesus and his followers consistently used the word father for both their heavenly father God, as well as their biological, fathers, but the Bible records that others used the title of father when speaking about people that were neither.

At Mark11:10 when Jesus entered Jerusalem riding on a colt, the crowds shouted:

“Blessed be the kingdom of our father David, that cometh in the name of the Lord: Hosanna in the highest”

Here, the crowds are calling King David, father. King David was a righteous man, and is spoken of as an example to be held up for all who wish to please God. So it would not be wrong for the Jewish people to admire King David.

One of the ways that David set himself apart from other world rulers was by his associations with his heavenly father and his earthly father. Even though David’s Father Jesse was not a major Bible character, he is mentioned by name 42 times. Many of those occurrences as part of the phrase “David, son of Jesse”.

Jesse is Strong’s H3448 and means possessor. It is formed from the Hebrew word Iysh Strong’s H376 which means male tribal leader. In prophecy God himself is called iysh at Hosea2:16.

“And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.”

If we break down this verse according to the definitions of the Hebrew words, Iysh and Ba’al, what is being said here is:

“On that day you will no longer call me your God by contract, but instead will call me your male tribal leader.”

Alternately, if we insert Strong’s definition for the word Jesse what is said here, would be more like this:

“On that day, you will no longer call me your God by contract, but instead will call me your possessor.”

Many Bible readers associate the word possession with demon possession. Jesus cast out demons during his ministry, and very obviously those demons did possess the people that Jesus cast them out of. The Hebrew word Cain, Strong’s H7014 means possession. The implication being that Cain was possessed by someone other than his rightful male tribal leader, his biological father Adam.

Throughout the Bible we are constantly warned against associating with those who are filled with a wicked spirit, but encouraged to associate with those who are filled with the Holy Spirit. When speaking of the wicked we will not hesitate to use the word possession, but when speaking of those who are filled with the Holy Spirit, we never use such a word.

Possession is not a dirty word, it is simply part of the English language. Knowing that the same word is used to describe both, possession by the demons, and possession by God, helps us to have a better understanding of things that are going on in the invisible, spirit, realm.

For someone like Jesus, calling King David, father, could perhaps be appropriate, since his mother was a descendant of David, but since the family lines, as recorded in the Bible are always through the father, perhaps not.

There may have been people among the crowds that day that could trace their lineage through David, but it is unlikely that everyone present could do so.

As recorded it was not a portion of the crowd that was claiming King David as their father. The crowds were making this claim with one unified voice.

Later these same crowds would be shouting, with that same unified voice:

“Crucify him. Crucify him.”

Even though the prophets of old had repeatedly stated that the messiah would come through the line of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah, Jesse, and David, Jesus never once used the word father when speaking of such men. If you go back and look at Mark11:10 one more time, you will see that what the crowds were specifically calling David, was the father of their kingdom.

At John8:38-42 Jesus addressed the religious leaders of his day saying, that he was from his father, God, but that they were from their father the devil. They responded by claiming that their father was Abraham. Abraham was not a King, but he was obviously another person that the Jews would have thought of as a father. In particular “The Father Of Their Race”.

At Matthew3:9 Jesus ridiculed such a claim by stating that God could turn rocks into “Children Of Abraham”.

Jesus was not speaking about the genealogy of the Pharisees. Most people understand that it was not the issue of family lineage that Jesus was addressing at this passage. Those rocks very obviously did not posses human DNA.

At Matthew 23:29-31 Jesus used the word father as it would have been used by the scribes and Pharisees:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, saying, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ Thus you witness against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets.”

If we look at these verses and think deeply about what is said, as well as what is not said, it becomes obvious that the use of the word father here, has nothing to do with family lineage.

Since both the prophets, and those who killed them were descendants of Jacob, both groups would have been the biological ancestors of the Pharisees. There would be no way around it.

The events that Jesus was speaking about had taken place hundreds of years earlier. Every member of Jewish society would have been somehow related to those prophets, as well as to those who killed them.

When the Pharisees claimed that they would not have killed the prophets if they had lived at the time of their fathers, it established that those Pharisees felt that they had an emotional bond with those whom they called father that they did not have with those that they referred to as the prophets. That emotional bond, is what we today call patriotism.

Cain did not kill Abel because he did something wrong, but because Abel always tried to do what was right.(1John3:12) Throughout the Bible, Abel is always held up as an example of a righteous person for us to emulate. Abel unlike Cain who was possessed by an unclean spirit, was obviously filled with a clean spirit. In the Bible, the words clean and unclean are used interchangeably with the words wicked and righteous. At least when speaking of spirits.

Those so called “fathers” killed the prophets for the same reason that Cain killed his brother. They killed the prophets, because the prophets made them look bad.

According to 1John3:12:

“We do not want to be like Cain, who was of the evil one, and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his deeds were evil, and his brother’s deeds were righteous.”

In this verse Cain is said to be of the evil one, Satan, the founder of civilization.

Jesus was pointing out a tendency of all people throughout all of human history to think of the founders of nations as fathers. Even those who are founders of institutions and crafts are called fathers in the Bible. Genesis4:20-21 bears this out.

“ Adah gave birth to Jabal; he was the father of those who dwell in tents and have livestock. His brother’s name was Jubal; he was the father of all those who play the lyre and pipe.”

Obviously all of those who have ever dwelt in tents have not been the biological children of Jabal, and likewise, all of those who have ever played musical instruments have not been the biological children of Jubal.” However, even in our modern society we recognize the founders of many institutions as fathers.

Genesis Chapter 10 is called the table of nations. It is a list of every nation that existed in Abraham’s day, and each of those nations has the same name as their founding fathers. In other words the nation that was called Mizraim was named after the father of everyone that lived there. His name being Mizraim as well. Initially Mizraim was not just the figurative father of his nation, but the actually father of everyone who lived there.

All the way through the Old Testament the name of the nation of Mizraim never changed’ even long after the founder had died, and even after many thousands had migrated out of Mizraim, and many thousand of others had migrated into Mizraim. Eventually many of the people that lived in Mizraim were not biologically related to it’s founder in any way, and yet throughout the Old Testament, the name of the nation never changed. In English Mizraim is translated as Egypt.

When Abraham fled into Egypt, he came into contact with a man that the Bible calls Pharaoh. (Strong’s H6547) In Hebrew, Pharaoh means Great family. However most Bible reference material says that pharaoh means “great house”. Even in our day the words house and family are often interchangeable. In the ancient past there was only one word for both.

The title Pharaoh is used throughout the Bible, in both the Old and New Testaments, but by Jesus day, the meaning of the word Pharaoh (Strong’s G5328), the exact same word spelled using the Greek alphabet, was not the same as the meaning of the word Pharaoh as found in the Old Testament, spelled using the Hebrew alphabet.

The word meaning great house in Hebrew, when rendered into Greek, means “His Nakedness”. Altering the meaning of this word in this way, in our Bibles, is not without purpose. Hundreds of years earlier at Isaiah20:4, it was recorded:

“so shall the king of Assyria lead away the Egyptian captives and the Cushite exiles, both the young and the old, naked and barefoot, with buttocks uncovered. The nakedness of Egypt.”

When Abraham met Pharaoh, it is likely that the Pharaoh that he met was in fact his distant cousin, Mizraim.

As this series continues I am going to be sharing information about family relationships that is going to be critical to our understanding of the overall theme of the Bible.

Noah, and his sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth would have survived long after the ark came to rest on dry land. Long enough to witness their descendants grow in numbers great enough to cover a large area of the Earth. As long as Noah was alive, he would have been the family head of everyone on the planet. According to natural law, Noah should have been the acknowledged father of everyone alive on the Earth.

But according to to the Bible, Noah’s roll as family head was not respected as it should have been.

The births and deaths of many significant Bible personalities were recorded according to a very easy to understand system of dating. Bible chronology of major events is always associated with the lives of those men. In other words, it is very easy to determine the timing of major Bible events by simply looking at who was involved in those events.

According to the Bible, Abraham was involved in the first recorded war in all of human history. At the conclusion of a major battle in that war Abraham met with a man called Melchizedek. Most people are familiar with the account. But what most people are not aware of is that according to Bible chronology, the war that Abraham was involved in, began while Noah was still alive.

There can be no doubt, that if humanity had been obedient to God’s natural law, of honoring father and mother, there is no way that Noah’s descendants would have been fighting for world domination. As the father of everyone alive, it would have been common knowledge that Noah was the rightful family head of mankind.

By the time that Abraham met with Melchizedek, Noah was already dead. We are not told about the cause of Noah’s death, but it is very likely that his death was related to the war. He may have been murdered by one of his descendants who was lusting after world domination, or he may have simply died of a broken heart at seeing his descendants murdering one another.

Those who were the recognized leaders in that war, are all mentioned by name. The Bible tells us who they were, where they came from, and who their parents were, and clearly says that each and every one of them was killed by God for refusing to honor their fathers and mothers. I will explain this in much greater detail in part 3 of this series.

Speaking of powerful world leaders as fathers is not a behavior that is unique to ancient Judea. As a child I was taught about the founding fathers of America. As a member of the US military, I traveled to many nations and witnessed personally that most countries refer to powerful political leaders from the past, as their fathers.

In particular, I remember talking to a man in Turkey, about their coins. I had noticed that every coin had an image of the same man on it. When I asked who he was, I was told, “That is our father Ataturk”. Ataturk is the recognized founding father of modern Turkey.

At a very young age, I was aware of Jesus’ admonition to call no man father, but until about 15 years ago, I was never really able to recognize the connection between what Jesus said, and the founding fathers of nations.

As far as I know, none of the men that are called founding fathers of this country are part of my family tree. But even if they were, I would still have to keep in mind what Jesus said at Mathew 23:9,10.

“Call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.”

Patriotism can be defined as the belief that a person should put the welfare of their own community, or nation above the welfare of others. In effect seeking their own self interest. Obviously there would be a major conflict with the teachings of Patriotism and the teaching of Christ to honor our fathers and mothers and love our neighbor as our self.

I can not imagine following the example set by the Pharisees of calling wicked men by the title of father. In the land of my birth, those who are considered the founding fathers, were very much like those whom the Pharisees considered to be their fathers.

Even if I were to find out that each and every one of the founding fathers of America were part if my family tree, I would feel no obligation to break God’s law as a means of honoring them. Keeping in mind the words of Jesus as recorded at Matthew 10:37, our feelings towards the wicked should not be affected by our genealogy.

“He that loves his father and mother more than me is not worthy of me.”

If we go back into the Bible and look at the word prophet as it is consistently used, it quickly becomes obvious that being considered a prophet is not limited to men such as Daniel, Elijah, and Samuel. Hundreds of people in the Bible are called prophet even though there is no evidence that they did the miraculous things that were accomplished by such men.

Most Bible prophets were simply people that rejected civilization and cared for God’s creation. Men and women that cared for the land and it’s animals. Those who are often spoken of by titles such as shepherd.

I produced a video a while back called “Rechabite Economy” about one family that refused to participate in Jewish society, and were miraculously spared destruction when Babylon conquered, enslaved, and executed many others. The story of that family as recorded in our Bibles bears a striking resemblance to the story of the Native peoples of North America.

Many of those that are considered to be the founding fathers of The United States, took the lead in conducting the North American Genocide. It was the founding fathers that initiated laws forcing the young men of this nation to engage in carnal warfare, often against their will. Many of the founding fathers enslaved their fellow human beings in their lusts for power and material wealth.

In our day if you ask a patriot about the undeniable vile behavior of the founding fathers, they, just like the Pharisees will explain how times were different, as if somehow, human beings have only recently discovered the difference between right and wrong. As Jesus said at Matthew 23:29-31:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Patriots! For you build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, saying, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ Thus you witness against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets.”

I love my father because he loved me and cared for my needs when I was unable to care for myself. If my father had dedicated his life to breaking God’s law in some kind of quest for world domination, it is unlikely that I would have developed the kind of relationship that I had with the man who dedicated his life to being my father.

I love my God for the same reason.

I speak of both my fleshly father who raised me, and my creator who gave me life as Father. If I had been lovingly raised by a man that was not biologically related to me, I imagine that I would have developed similar emotions for that man.

The title of father represents something too precious and holy to share with those who do not qualify. Giving parental honor to those who are not our parents would break God’s law to honor our father and mother.

By accident of birth I live within the the boarders of the land that those men stole. I do not live my life in such a way as to pay some kind of homage to them. But, at the same time, I don’t live my life in such a way as to pay homage to those that they killed.

I do however, try to live my life in a way that should be pleasing to my fleshly father and mother. But I especially try to live my life in a way that I feel would be pleasing to my heavenly father.

I recognize that the command to honor my father and mother, might require me to honor the fathers and mothers of my fathers and mothers, all the way back to Adam and Eve, the original father and mother of us all. As I understand the commandment to honor my father and mother, as repeated throughout the Bible, I feel safe in saying that this likely accurately represents the only human hierarchy ever approved by God.

When we take into consideration how the title of appointed one is used throughout the Bible, we see a pattern similar to that of the use of the word meaning father.

The word hageomai is repeatedly used to denote men who were appointed as high ranking government officials.

The Bible repeatedly tells us that all human beings have the same father. God did not create his children so that they would form up into teams, ruled over by wicked men with a lust for power, unlawfully claiming the titles of father, or master, for themselves.

Malachi2:10 puts it this way:

Do we not all have one father? Did not one God create us all? Why do we profane the covenant of our ancestors by being unfaithful to one another?

Somehow even Pilot recognized that Jesus had been appointed by God. As the Jews were demanding that Jesus be put to death at John 19:15, Pilot asked them:

“Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.”

As honorable as their decision may have seemed at the time, the Jews did not maintain their patriotic zeal all the way to their end. Only a few short years after rejecting Jesus, in favor of Caesar. God used the Roman empire to execute those who executed his son. Divine Justice, Indeed!

At Isaiah9:6 in prophecy, Jesus is called prince.

“For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”

The title of prince indicates that Jesus would be considered the son of the King. Since Jesus is the recognized son of God, this would be appropriate. But, in this verse, Jesus is also called everlasting Father.

How do we incorporate the idea of Jesus being our everlasting father, with our new understanding of Jesus words at Mathew 23:9,10, to call no man father?

“And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.”

Keeping in mind, that the word translated as master in this verse would be more accurately translated as appointed one, and that it is unique in this verse because of the prefix kata.

Hageomai means appointed one, but kathegetes means one who is appointed to.

This entire verse is primarily about who we should call father. Here, we are being commanded to call God our father because he created us, while at the same time being commanded to call Jesus our father because God appointed Jesus to be our father.

The war between God’s Kingdom and Satan’s Empire is a war between two feuding families. Those who are children of civilization’s founding fathers, have been at war with the children of God for nearly 6,000 years. That war is nearing it’s end.

According to 1John3:10, determining who someone’s father is, is actually quite easy.

“In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.”

As the children of Satan continue to slaughter one another in their perpetual war for world domination, the children of God continue to patiently wait for God’s kingdom to be restored.

Each and every person alive on this Earth came to be, through a process knows as sexual reproduction. In English this process is also known as sexual intercourse. Often when speaking of sexual reproduction, we will simply say intercourse.

In English this word can also mean communication or dealings between individuals or groups. Iinterestingly enough, there seem to be similar words in many languages spoken by man.

Even in ancient Hebrew, words associated with communication are used to describe sexual reproducion. At Genesis 4:1 the Bible says:

“Now Adam KNEW his wife Eve, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.”

The word translated as knew is actually the word yada (Strong’s H3045) At some verses this word is obviously about sexual intercourse, but at other verses it is not. Genesis 3:7 uses the word yada this way:

“Then the eyes of both were opened, and they KNEW that they were naked.”

We have purposely been trained from infancy to think of communication as being language, whether written or spoken, but it should be obvious to everyone that communication, involves much more. All of our senses can be involved. Embracing somone is a form of communication. Kissing is a form of communication. And very obviously sexual intercourse, is simply another form of communication.

Sexual intercourse not only allows a man and woman to very effectively communicate their emotions to one another, but it also allows a man and woman to communicate to their offspring.

It is the sex act that communicates things such as hair color, skin color, height, and blood type into what makes us who we are physically. Only our biological parents can transmit these things into thier children. Many times we can even perceive personality traits transmitted from parent to child.

Even though physical characteristics may be part of what defines us as a person, a much more important part of what makes us who we are would be our personality.

How much of our personality is inherited biologically is unknown. But it should be obvious that much of what defines us is a matter of personal choice.

It is through sexual intercourse that we inherit our physical characteristics. It is through social intercourse that we inherit our spiritual characteristics. When Jesus called the Pharisees children of the serpents, he was very obviously speaking about the effects of social intercourse. Not sexual intercourse.

I know that what I am telling you may sound strange. It may not even make sense to you for the moment. But I promise that by the end of this series, it will make perfect sense in a way that you are currently not even able to imagine. Please continue to watch this series all the way to it’s end.

If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.

Judge Not Lest Thou Be Judged

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be about a very popular verse that nearly everyone alive in the Western World has committed to memory. At Matthew7:1 according to the King James Version of the Bible, Jesus said:

“Judge not that ye be not judged.”

In my life, many self professed Christians have pointed this verse out to me whenever I was speaking about some vile behavior perpetrated against me by someone wicked. Obviously those doing so felt that by helping me to see the light, they were engaging in the work of the LORD.

Since I have been reading the Bible pretty much continually for about 40 years, I always felt that I should have a really good grasp of the Bible. At least as good as those that God was sending to scold me. But, no matter how many times people told me to remove the beam from my eye, I never felt like I had a beam in my eye.(Matthew7:5)

I knew that the Bible was filled with the admonition to stay away from wicked people, and could not figure out how I was suppose to do that, unless I first made a judgment call as to whether or not someone was in fact wicked.

Psalms26:4,5 says,

“I have not kept company with worthless people. I will have nothing to do with hypocrites. I hate the crowds of evildoers and I will not sit in the company of the wicked.”

Psalms1:1,2 says,

Happy is the man that has not walked in the counsel of the wicked ones, And in the way of sinners has not stood, And in the seat of ridiculers has not sat. But his delight is in the law of Jehovah, And in his law he reads in an undertone day and night.

This is how the Bible book of Psalms starts out. As originally recorded, this isn’t just a commandment to be good, and not to be bad, but an admonition to stay away from those who are bad.

Years ago, when I was a member of the Jehovah’s Witness Faith, I remember hearing this verse in exactly this way week after week.

It bothered me that the people quoting these verses were often the most vile bullies at the Kingdom Hall, but I kept telling myself, that these men had been put in place to act as “Elders Over God’s Flock”. Perhaps God understands that it takes a bully to teach people how to be good.”

I know that may sound stupid to most people listening to this information, but having been abused all of my life, I badly wanted to believe that God had some kind of organization where a person, like myself, could take refuge from this violent world. Over time I would learn that no such religious organization exists.

But, I learned a lot about Matthew7:1 just from paying attention to who was the most obsessed with promoting it. I was very well aware that meek loving people would willingly submitted to the admonition not to be judgmental.

But those who were actively engaged in promoting this ideal were always the most wicked members of every religious organization that I have ever been involved with. The priest, ministers, elders, ministerial servants, pastors, and preachers of every congregation, of every religion that I have ever participated in, were always much more devious and wicked, than the simple people that were filling the pews.

Anytime that I spoke to anyone about the abuses that I was aware of, I was accused of being judgmental. When I was a Jehovah’s Witness, there was a very well defined system for keeping people from questioning how things were done in the congregation.

Anytime that one of the elders molested a child, or defrauded some poor widow, and got away with it, we were told that the body of elders was aware of the situation, and was handling it. Another thing that we were told was that it was our Christian duty not to speak of such things with anyone other than the appointed elders.

To anyone that has ever been involved with the Jehovah’s Witness faith, it is a well known fact, that even though the wicked are rarely disfellowshipedd, those who openly reveal what the elders are up to, usually are.

The primary reason that I am highlighting the behavior of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, is because I was a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, as an adult, for much longer than I have ever been involved with any other religion. In other words, I can speak about their misconduct from personal experience.

Secondly, in recent years, it has become quite common for the behavior of the Jehovah’s Witness Hierarchy to be publicly exposed. The reputation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses now rivals that of the Catholic Church. As such, I feel much more comfortable using them as an example. The policies of the Jehovah’s Witness religion, in handling such matters, have become a matter of public record.

However. It must be understood that this kind of conduct is not unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Catholics. It isn’t even unique to Christianity. Reports from all around the world, involving the leaders of all of mankind’s faiths, are every bit as evil and perverted as the ones that are well publicized here in The West.

All religions Earth wide, are run by hypocrites. All have systems in place for hiding the deeds of the clergy class. All have very abusive policies in place for dealing with whistle blowers, and all have doctrinal teachings against judging others, that sound very similar to Christianity’s admonition not to do so.

Obviously I was not aware of everything that everybody did in their personal lives, but I knew enough to understand who was a bully, and who was not. I had witnessed similar behavior in every part of Civilization’s Trinitarian Empire.

Throughout human history, all civilizations from the very beginning all the way to our day, have been made up of Satan’s three foundation stones.

As represented by the Eye of Providence, also known as the “All Seeing Eye” those three principle support systems of civilization have always been the governmental system, the economic system, and the religious system. Without one, the other two would not function.

It is Civilization’s trinity that is the model for all of the trinitarian religions Earth Wide. The father, son, and holy spirit, of Christianity are based on the governmental systems, economic systems, and religious systems of civilization.

To get to the top positions in any of those systems takes a an insane level of evil that very few people are capable of. But even those that achieve a relatively low position in any of those organizations have to be more evil than the general population. Only the most competitive stand any chance of success in a world where competitiveness is regarded as a good quality.

I understood from an early age that most religions primarily focused on shunning people that engaged in things like Gambling, Drugs, Loud Music, and Skimpy Outfits”, which always struck me as rather odd.

I had always thought of bullying as a much more evil sin than any of that, and can’t remember any pastor, priest, preacher, or elder ever bringing up the subject of bullying. It seemed to me as if every religion Earth Wide was avoiding the subject of aggressive behavior. It was as if the religions of man were simply making people feel so guilty about inconsequential things, that they would not pay attention to the more important things.

The first 40 years of my life were spent in and around religion. I understood that there had to be a creator, and that religious people had a reputation for worshiping that creator. I wanted to be part of something bigger than myself.

I personally was never all that interested in pointless rituals, or religious rules, but felt that if millions of people believed in such things, then perhaps it was me that needed correcting. Perhaps I could learn something from such people.

I was not taught the Bible by religion. I read the Bible on my own, at a time in my life, when I was not involved in any religion at all.

I was drawn to god’s word by the simplicity of Jesus’ message. Anyone reading the Bible from start to finish would instantly recognize the repeating admonition placed on being loving, and not being selfish. Philippians1:10 puts it this way:

“I continue praying that your love may abound still more and more with accurate knowlege and full discernment that you may make sure of the more important things, so that you may be flawless, and not stumbling others up to the day of Christ.”

I have always loved that phrase, “Make sure of the more important things” It sums up perfectly the difference between religion and truth. This verse was quoted regularly at the meetings of Jehvah’s Witnesses, as a means of convincing their worshipers that they were somehow different from the other religions that focused on the less important things.

In God’s eyes, religion is religion. Please don’t attempt to convince yourself that there are such things as good religion, and bad religion. Wickedness may come in many varieties, but no variety of wickedness is God’s favorite.

The Apostle Paul actually left a written record of what kind of character traits to look for when trying to determine if a person is good or evil. As described, the two different kinds of people are those who are selfish, and those who are not.

All of Galatians Chapter 5 is about this single subject. Verses 14, and 15, say:

“For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another”

Obviously to anyone with an open mind, and a little bit of common sense, this describes completely the difference between a wicked person and a righteous person. Those who love one another obviously would not want to control one another or harm one another. Those doing these things would expose what kind of person they are by their deeds.

To a religious person, the definition of love as taught by their pastors might not be accurate, so Paul went into much greater detail just so that there would be no mistake about what kinds of people to associate with, and what kinds of people to avoid.

At Galatians4:16 he says:

“This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.”

Sexual conduct has always been an important aspect of righteousness among those who are involved in religion, and obviously that is what Christianity’s translators were trying to highlight as this verse has been rendered.

However the archaic language used here does not do this verse justice. The Greek words epithymia and sarx which are translated as lust of the flesh, would be more accurately translated as desires of the flesh, and could be anything that a fleshly person could desire. Not just things of a sexual nature.

Galatians5:22 lists all of the things that would be the opposite of the desires of the flesh, calling them the fruit of the spirit.

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and control of self. Against such things there is no law. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.

All of the things that Paul spoke of as fruit of the spirit are very similar in nature. All indicate that a person, who is filled with the holy spirit, would recognize themselves as a small part of the greater whole. All of these characteristics could be used to describe someone that puts others ahead of themselves. A selfish person would very obviously not meet Paul’s Criteria.

We should rightfully expect a wicked person to be the opposite of a righteous person, and that the character traits of such a person would be the opposite as well. At Galatians5:19-21 it says:

“Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, drunkenness, orgies, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God”

Once again, the characteristics defining a wicked person seemingly are predominantly sexual in nature. We should question why that is.

The opposite of love, would be hate. The opposite of control of self, would be control of others. The opposite of patience would be intolerance. In fact about half of the English words that are used here would describe wicked character traits that obviously are the opposites of those good character traits.

The verse concludes with the phrase “Things Like These” Character traits such as enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, and envy are all similar to one another. They are all very much what we would expect to see in this verse. All could be described as “Things Like These”.

But……. Sex outside of marriage, would not logically be perceived as the opposite of love. We would not automatically think of orgies as the opposite of joy. Plus, things like sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, drunkenness, and orgies are not at all like enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, and envy.

The comparison that Paul makes here, according to the English translations, simply doesn’t make any linguistic sense.

Christian churches have always emphasize the wickedness of sex acts between people that are not legally married, or sex acts between people that are married to others, but in the original language, that is not what these verses are about. In Greek, all of the character traits that describe those desires of the flesh, are about competition. The struggle to get ahead.

In the original Greek, there is nothing recorded here about sex being wicked in and of itself. The word that is rendered here as sexual immorality would more be more accurately rendered as using sex as a tool to get ahead. Whether by blackmail, or by intentionally marrying into a wealthy or powerful family, simply as a means of improving one’s social status.

The Greek word porneia, which is always associated with sex, and is in fact where we get our English word pornography, does not necessarily have anything to do with sex. It is formed from the Greek word porneuo Strong’s G4203, which simply means to sell off, or as we might say in English, to sell out. This word as used in Greek could mean selling ourselves out in any way.

Another word found throughout the New Testament is poneros. (Strong’s G4190) Poneros is similar to our English word evil. This word is consistently translated as wickedness, or evil, in most translations of the Bible.

As originally used in the Greek language, Porneuo means to sell something, porneia means to sell oneself. A politician or salesman telling you what you want to hear in order to get your vote, or get your money would be porneia. Making love without a license from the state would not.

In fact, even the act of getting married would qualify as porneia when done as a means of improving your financial or social status. Porneia is the reason that so many fat, ugly, decrepit, old Hollywood stars, wealthy economic leaders, and powerful politicians are married to sexy, beautiful, healthy, young men and women.

Even getting married, to ensure that the father or mother of your children is bound by law to provide care or resources for your children could qualify as porneia.

Another word that is poorly and likely intentionally mistranslated at this verse would be sorcery. Pharmakeia Strong’s G5331 means poisoning and has nothing whatsoever to do with sorcery, or witchcraft or divination or any other such concept. Pharmakeia is where we get our English word pharmaceutical.

I have heard many of Christianity’s leaders try to make this word about drug addiction, or about the use of drugs to call forth demons, but the reality is that this word as used in the Bible always means poison, or poisoning.

Another English word that is used here, which does not fit in with the surrounding verses is drunkenness. Obviously using alcohol to deaden one’s mind can’t be a good thing, but it certainly would not be something that would be the opposite of any of the qualities that Paul calls the “Fruit Of The Spirit”

Throughout the Bible poison and drunkenness are often spoken of together. Drunkenness in the Bible is not limited to alcohol consumption. Poisoning is not limited to things that a person takes in through their mouth.

Deuteronomy32:33 says:

“Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.”

The dragons and asps spoken of in this verse are not your typical reptiles. Throughout the Bible words such as drunkenness and poison are often associated with the teachings of Satan and his demons.

Anything taught by Satan, through the public education system, the churches, or the networks should be considered spiritual poison. To those of us who are filled with the Holy Spirit, the actions of those modeling their lives on such teachings would would make them appear to us as drunkards.

All lies originate with Satan, the father of the institution of lying. At Revelation17:2, and 18:3 drunkenness, and fornication are closely associated with the teachings of demons.

The verses found at Galatians Chapter 5, are all about the things that people do to improve their social status, their own flesh, so to speak, without any regard as to the affect that their actions will have on others.

If you think about what I am telling you and keep an open mind, as you are reading Galatians Chapter 5, you will see that everything that I am saying is makes perfect sense. In fact if you should take the time to research the word origins of the original Greek words found at these verses, you will see that what I am saying is undeniable.

Understanding that God has given us clear instructions for distinguishing between righteous people and wicked people, we need to find a way to make what Jesus said at Matthew7:1, agree with Galatians Chapter 5.

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged.”

As taught by Christianity the Bible seems to be contradicting itself. But, this is not the only scripture available for our study about the subject of judging.

James2:1-4 says:

“ My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,” have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

Obviously Galatians Chapter 5 is about how God Judges. At Matthew7:1 Jesus was warning about Judging according to the rules of civilization. James was speaking very clearly in a way that all of us can relate to. But if we examine the words of James more closely, Jesus warning about Judging takes on even more meaning. As verse 3 states:

“If you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place, have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?”

At this verse, according to the Bible, it isn’t just thinking poorly of someone that is considered judging. Verses 3 and 4 clearly state that admiring someone for their accomplishments, would also be considered judging, and not just judging, but evil judging. The Bible leaves no room for interpretation here.

When the resurrection begins, it will become obvious just how pitiable mankind’s craving for power and prestige are. God’s Holy Spirit will be recognized by everyone remaining, and no one alive will ever again be competitive and selfish.

No one will ever be more successful, or more powerful, or more accomplished than anyone else alive on the Earth. There will be no such thing as social status. We will all be brothers and sisters.

In the mean time, we all need to be aware that most of our neighbors are not filled with the the Holy Spirit, but instead are full of themselves. Their fruit will expose them for what they are.

All of those that believe in Civilization and the system of punishment and reward that has been put in place by the God of Civilization, must be considered dangerous. They know who and what we are, and will do everything in their power to make us into one of them.

Those who willingly participate in the competition that defines human society, are not to be trusted. Those who separate themselves according to their nationality, race, gender, or religion, will not be able to tolerate finding out that you do not. The poisonous teachings of Satan have rendered them drunkards. Such people will do everything in their power to poison you, and make you drunk as well.

Anyone who puts their faith in the Social Hierarchy that exists under Satan’s rulership must be avoided. They intuitively know that what they are doing is wrong.

The only way that they can justify their selfish behavior is by convincing themselves, that everyone puts their faith in Satan’s pyramid scheme. It is as if they are already planning on avoiding God’s judgment by claiming that “Everyone Was Doing It”. They know that such an excuse will not work as long as so much as one person alive, is not involved.

When Abel was killed it was not because of some wickedness on his part, it was because he was righteous.(1John3:12) Two thousand years later a man named Peleg lost his life. He was the very first person to die after the flood.(Genesis10:25) Just as in the story of Cain and Abel, it is likely that Peleg died at the hands of his brother Joktan, for the same reason that Abel died, at the hands of his brother Cain.

In our day the war that began with Peleg’s death continues on. Moving about from nation to nation, brother killing brother, and usually for the same reason.

When questioned by God about his brother, Cain replied “Am I my brother’s keeper”(Genesis4:9-10) According to the Bible the answer to that question would be YES! But God made it much more clear.

“Listen. Do you hear that? That is the sound of your brother’s blood crying out to me from the ground”

Every decision that we make affects the lives of those around us. Whether we literally murder someone as Cain did, or just make things a little more difficult for our neighbors. The Holy Spirit is everywhere. There is no possible way for aggressive, competitive, selfish people to hide what they are, from God.

We can exhibit the character traits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and control of self. Knowing that when we do, it makes God happy.

Or we can achieve great things in the world by being aggressive, competitive, and selfish.

It would be foolish, and even wicked to judge people as the world judges. What someone does in their personal life shouldn’t concern us. Their sexual activities are none of our business. Their position in the social order, should not impress us or disgust us. What kind of music they listen to, is their business.

To judge things as man judges things is wicked. “Judge not lest thou be judged.”

But if you want to survive, it would be a good idea to use common sense and see things as God sees things. Galatians Chapter 5 clearly defines the character traits of a wicked person, and the character traits of a righteous person. Paul did not write the Book of Galatians without purpose.

According to John12:31, The ruler of Civilization has already been judged. It is not judgmental on our part to speak of it. By the same word it is very easy to determine who is following the ruler of Civilization, and recognize that they, just like their god have already been judged as well.

Satan his demons, and all of his human followers, know that their time is running out. They are going to do everything in their power to get you on their team before the end comes. Remaining righteous may keep you from climbing the ladder of success, it may even cost you your life. But the reward will be great.

According to Psalms37:10:

“In just a little while, the wicked will be gone. No matter how carefully you look for them, you will not be able to find them. They will not be permitted to remain in their place.”

If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.


Hello, and welcome to another video from the only channel that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be about love.

To anyone who reads the Bible there can be no doubt that in order for our worship to be acceptable to God we must have love. When asked which of the commandments was the greatest Jesus said:

“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself”

It is recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke that Jesus said this, but the details in each version of the story are different. It seems as if the three different versions of the story are describing three separate incidents. If that is the case, then we must recognize that this teaching was not simply intended for his audience at that time.

At the time, historians of the day recorded that there was a lot of bickering going on between Judah’s various religious factions about just what was the most important law, in the Jewish legal code.

Matthew Henry wrote that among the laws that the religionists of the day felt were the most important were, The Law of Circumcision, The Law of the Sabbath, and The Law of Sacrifices.

Since becoming SustenanceNCovering, I have run into many similar arguments among the religionists of our day. Everybody seems to be wanting to break the code for getting into heaven, without having to give up their selfish behavior.

This idea was not totally unique to Jesus. Part of what he said was a quote of Deuteronomy6:4-5, about the requirement to love God. And then he added that we must also love our neighbor as ourselves. Jesus was simply combining two very important concepts that were already recorded in many other parts of the Bible.

On at least one occasion, even the religionist asking the question had to admit to the superiority of this one commandment. He like everyone else would have recognized that Jesus was pointing out something that everyone should have already known.

Mark12:32-34 says:

“And the scribe said to him, “You are right, Teacher. You have truly said that he is one, and there is no other besides him. And to love him with all the heart and with all the understanding and with all the strength, and to love one’s neighbor as oneself, is much more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.” And when Jesus saw that he answered wisely, he said to him, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” And after that no one dared to ask him any more questions.”

Everyone in the crowd would have recognized that this scribe was referring directly to scriptures such as 1Samuel15:22, and Hoseah6:6.

“For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.”

The people who were questioning Jesus wanted to see him drawn into one of their philosophical debates over religious nonsense. Everyone recognized that Jesus spoke with authority. And there can be no doubt that many living at that time would want Jesus on their team. But as soon as he logically answered this question, none dared to say another word. Suddenly everyone in the crowd would have recognized the foolishness of their belief systems.

At least once a week for the last 6 years, someone has questioned me about some stupid religious nonsense, such as which day is the proper Sabbath, how to pronounce the sacred name of the lord, flat Earth, the eating of pork, but nothing that I say ever puts an end to it. Perhaps from now on, anytime that I am confronted by religion, I should just say, “I Love You”, and leave it at that.

At Matthew22:40 Jesus summed up his response, by stating that “The entire law, and everything written by the prophets is based on these two commandments.

Once again, Jesus was simply pointing out that the Greatest of all of the laws ever given to mankind was natural law. The Ten Commandments given to Moses as originally recorded in Hebrew was a perfect written description of all of the instinctive laws placed in mankind at creation.

Anyone who would practice what Moses, said at Deuteronom6:4,5 would by default love his neighbor, and keep all ten of God’s Commandments.

It should be easy enough to recognize that if you love God and your neighbor, by default you will not kill your neighbor, you will not steal from your neighbor, you will not covet your neighbors material possessions, or family members, and given the opportunity, love of neighbor and self would require that we be willing to rest.

It should be brought out that even the most loving person would not instinctively know how to build a tabernacle, or the proper way to sacrifice a goat, or how much skin to surgically remove from their son’s penis.

The seemingly arbitrary law of Moses was designed from the beginning to represent all arbitrary laws had ever existed in the past, or would follow in the future, whether the laws of Babylon, Egypt, Rome, or The US.

Outside of The Natural Instinctive Law placed in Adam at Creation, and Ten Commandments give to Moses, no law that has ever been created has been based on The Law Of Love.

Much of the confusion about just what love is, has to do with the unclear way that the Bible has been translated from it’s original languages into the languages of our modern Bibles.

In our modern Bibles, there are two words that end up getting translated into our English word love. As English speakers, we understand that there are different levels of love. The love that we have for chocolate would obviously not be the same as our love for our children.

Christianity’s leaders understand precisely what these two different Greek words mean, but have intentionally kept that distinction hidden from their congregations for hundreds of years.

The two different words that I am talking about are philos, Strong’s G5384, and agape, Strong’s G26. Since these two words are not linguistically similar, we should want to understand why.

The explanation that is presented by the cults is that unlike the English language, the Ancient Greeks had six different words to describe love. Of those six, only agape and philia are found as stand alone words in the New Testament. Each of these words supposedly describes a different kind of love, that in English would simply be called love.

This isn’t actually true. Language is language, and even though languages may have different words, and may be structured differently, as far as I can tell all languages are designed to do the same thing. Communicate thoughts.

In English words like, love, prefer, like, lust, romance and desire might be perceived as the same word to an outsider, but to those of us who speak English, such words are obviously different. In an English dictionary, none of these English words would be defined in the same way.

If the ancient Greeks wanted to communicate something, we can trust that we as English speakers would have the ability to communicate that same idea. The ancient Greek words philia and agape can easily be communicated using the English language.

Agape is love. It is the only word found in the Bible that accurately communicates what love is. Agape is the word that is used in each of the Bible verses that I have quoted so far. Most definitions of agape as found in Christian reference material are not misleading, but neither are they clear. Fortunately we can come to a better understanding of how agape and philia relate to one another simply by looking at how these words are used in The Bible.

1John4:8 says, “He that does not love, does not know God because God is love.” Literally “He that does not agape, does not know God, because God is agape.”

Nowhere in the Bible is anything comparable said about the word phylia. It is important, that as you are listening to the information in this video, you keep in mind that it is only agape that can be rightfully translated as instinctive natural love. Agape.

All of the emotions that a human being can feel were created by God. As such it is not a sin on man’s part to experience the emotion of philia, but since God is agape, and not philia we can conclude that the emotion of agape is somehow not the same as the emotion of philia.

Even though God is agape, according to John5:20 God can experience the emotion of philia.

“For the Father loves the Son and shows him all that he himself is doing. He will show him even greater things to do than this, and you will all be amazed.”

In this verse the kind of love that God has for his son is philia. According to this passage, Jesus’ Listeners living in the first century, would all be amazed at the things that God was revealing to Jesus, because he was not revealing those things to them. This word philia would be indicating that in some way God was showing favor to Jesus.

John3:16 says, “For God had so much agape love for the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (agapao/egapesen Strong’s G25)

At this verse it is the word agape that is used. So, what the Bible is telling us, is that God is agape, and it is also telling us that God had so much agape, for mankind that he was willing to allow us to sacrifice his son, even though his love for his son was unique.

After years of Church indoctrination, it may be difficult to understand the subtle nuances that are being expressed in these statements, but since as humans, we are familiar with the complexity of human emotions, we shouldn’t have a problem recognizing, within ourselves the feelings expressed in these verses.

It should be obvious that God used the word philia to describe his love for his son, because that love was unique. That doesn’t mean that Agape isn’t a complete and perfect version of love, because Jesus himself said that his father loved him and in doing so used the word agape.

John15:9 says “As the Father has agape love for Me, I have agape love for you. Remain in My agape love.”

Here Jesus is using the word agape, three times to describe the similarity between the love that he had for his disciples and the love that his father had for him. Being the recipients of that agape love, it would be ridiculous on our part to be jealous of the special relationship that Jesus had with his father. Jesus’ love for us is wonderful. God’s love for us is wonderful. Can there really be any reason for us to be jealous of the phylia love that God had for Jesus?

If we compare every verse where these two words appear, we will start to see a pattern emerge. Agape is always just love, nothing more. Perfect love as placed in mankind at creation. The love that everyone Earth wide is suppose to have for everyone else. Agape love is the instinctive love that all of humanity would have, even for people that they have never met. Philia is preferential love.

According to the Bible we are not required to have preferential love for anyone, but we are required to have agape love for everyone. Romans13:8 says:

“Do not owe anything to anybody, with the exception of owing them agape love. Those who have agape love, have fulfilled God’s law.”

Nowhere in the Bible will you find a similar statement about philia love.

Obviously if God had philia, or preferential love for his son, then it would not be wrong for us to have philia, or preferential love as well.

We all experience this emotion. We may love everyone, but we would obviously love the people that we know, more than we love the people that we have never met. We often love members of our family more than we love the family that lives next door. It is likely that our English word feelings, evolved from the Greek word philia.

Our love for mankind in general, according to God’s natural law, would be agape love. The feelings that we have for those close to us would be agape love combined with philia love.

Another way to think of the difference between agape and philia, would be as instinctive love, and love according to personal choice. In most cases, the Greek word philia could be translated as preference, prefer, or favor.

Even though philia love is often shown towards someone that we have agape love for, and even though agape love is never wrong, sometimes philia love, is wrong.

According to the Bible, there is a perverted version of philia love. As Romans13:8 says, those who have God’s natural, instinctive agape love have fulfilled the law, meaning that without agape love, a person would breaking God’s law.

Obviously the preferential love, the philia love, the special feelings that we can have for someone or something, should never cause us to stop having agape love for any human being. That would be evil.

1Timothy6:10 says “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.”

At this verse the word used to describe love for money, is philia. In this instance philargyria, love of money. Understanding this concept reveals why Paul referred to the love of money as philargyria, and not agapagyria.

Since this verse is about an emotional attachment to something evil, it should be obvious that such an attachment would not be part of any natural, or instinctive behavior. Love may be part of our natural makeup, but love for money is not.

According to the verse, much of the suffering inflicted upon mankind has been caused by the love of money. Since causing suffering would go against God’s natural law to have agape love for all mankind, it should be quite simple for anyone to see that the philia love of money in and of itself is wicked. This form of philia love is not a good thing.

We all feel better when we have an abundance of money, and we may all feel depressed when we don’t have enough money. But that is not what I am talking about. As long as our feelings for money are not strong enough to compromise our agape love for others, we are not breaking God’s law.

Even though it is obvious that God understood how mankind’s emotions could be perverted, there is nothing in the Bible, or the natural world that would lead us to believe that God approves of human beings having a love of money that is greater than our love for our neighbors.

As we are reading our Bibles, we are not going to see a distinction made between philia love and agape love. When the Catholic Church originally translated the Bible from Attic Greek into Latin, they had that distinction removed. When King James had the Latin Bible translated into English that distinction was not restored. But if we understand the basics of how God feels about things, we should be able to determine which word would have been used in the original Greek versions of the books that make up our New Testaments.

It is simple enough to check this for ourselves. There are plenty of online Bible reference materials that are available to us free of charge to reveal which original language word is being used at whatever verse we might be researching.

Obviously the Churches are not going to tell you that love of money is a good thing, but should you question the goodness of money itself you will be quickly corrected.

I have heard more than one Christian, saying that money in and of itself is not evil, but only the love of money. Since most people feel that love is something that can not be proven in a court of law, they do not feel guilty about loving money more than anything else in the world. As if God is some kind of wicked human judge.

It is and always has been business as usual for mechanics to charge outlandish prices for work that they have not done. Doctors universally prescribe expensive medicines and procedures that are known to have little if any real benefit. Salesmen normally use every tool of deception that exist to convince their customers to purchase products that are more profitable, whether or not they are any better.

The single largest growth industry on the planet is theft. Expensive Insurance policies, warranties, and maintenance agreements, that rarely do what they promise. Overseas companies that sell expensive products with no intention of ever delivering. The list goes on and on.

It is and always has been very difficult to find work not based on deception, theft, and fraud, that pays a living wage.

One of Christianity’s primary functions is to defend Satan’s score keeping system. To speak out against the economy of their god, would be blasphemy.

In my lifetime, I have personally seen hundreds, if not thousands of examples of religious people using the misleading teachings of the church to defend insanely evil acts. So have you. And probably what I am about to tell you will come as no surprise, but many who listen to the information that I am about to share will become incensed.

The word Patriotism is defined as “love of country”. This kind of love would very obviously be a form of preferential love. In other words philia love. Not agape love. It could be compared to the love that someone might have for a family member. It could be said, that our countries are a part of our extended family. But that would be a perversion of the truth.

We can have philia love for individual family members, because we know them personally. Our preferential philia love should only be based on real life interaction, with individuals.

There would be nothing natural about loving someone that we have never met, more than someone else that we have never met, simply because they are somehow related to us.

In fact, this kind of philia love. This preferential love of extended family, could be more wicked than the philia love of money.

By definition, things like Racism, Xenophobia, Patriotism, Nationalism, Chauvinism, and Zionism, are all nothing more than forms of unatural preferential philia love for things that are not real.

Someone may argue that their philia love of their nation, race, gender, heritage, or culture, does not affect their agape love of humanity.

I have never once in my life witnessed a single example of any of the things that I am talking about, coexisting with agape love.

Where I live there has been an ongoing battle over the displaying of icons associated with The American Civil War, which was fought over 150 years ago.

The American Civil War was obviously fought for the exact same reason as every other war that has ever been fought. “Satanic ritual human sacrifice.” However, most believe that the war was over the issue of slavery. Obviously those who descended from the race that was enslaved would be offended by items memorializing such an insanely evil obsolete government policy.

I have never in my life taken a stand one way or another in this debate, because, I love white people, and I love black people. I always try to understand the emotions of my brothers and sisters even if their motives are questionable. I can not imagine any reason why someone would feel the need to fly a flag, that they knew would be offensive to someone, unless such a person was lacking in agape love.

But, in the same way, I cannot imagine ever feeling the need to tell someone what kind of flag they can fly. Once again, agape love would have to be lacking before someone would take such action. It is always better to simply try to find things that we have in common rather than seeking out reasons to pick a fight.

Admiring a statue of George Washington, or Patrick Henry, who were both very cruel owners of human slaves , while at the same time demanding that a statue of some southern General be taken down, really doesn’t make any sense to me.

More human beings have been enslaved, defrauded, and murdered under the banners of America, than were ever enslaved, defrauded, and murdered under any flag of the Confederacy. I can not imagine flying the flag of any nation, while complaining about the flag of any other.

This planet is quite literally polluted with the flags, and statues of human rulers. Someone expressing preferential, philia love for any of Satan’s Champions, would have to be lacking in agape love for the victims of such men.

It is because of patriotism, philia love of country, that walls are built to keep out people that we as humans are suppose to instinctively love. It is because of patriotism, philia love of country, that nations are invaded and people that we as humans are suppose to instinctively love, are murdered and stripped of their resources.

In the past, God arbitrarily set apart a single nation in his dealings with mankind, and as such it could be said that God had philia love for Israel. But his philia love did not necessitate ridding himself of his agape love.

Even when he exterminated entire nations for engaging in wickedness, he had agape love for the inhabitants of those nations.

When God kills someone it isn’t the same as when a human kills someone. As the Bible says at Hebrews 11:19 God can resurrect the dead. Humans cannot.

According to Matthew11:24, even the citizens of very wicked places, such as Capernaum, and Sodom, will be resurrected on the last day and given another opportunity to adjust to God’s natural law of love.

When humans travel to distant lands to take part in the genocidal campaigns of their individual nations and rulers, they have no grounds for claiming that they are doing it out of love. But I have heard more than one religious person use the Bible to defend carnal warfare based on agape love.

John15:13 says “Greater agape love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”

I have heard this verse used at more than one military funeral. I can promise you this. John15:13 has absolutely nothing to do with any combat deaths. When Jesus laid down his life, his intention was to lay down his life. Jesus was not killed while invading someone’s homeland, in order to procure more wealth and power for Herod.

In order to make ritual human sacrifice seem like a good thing, propagandist have have manipulated the human language so as to make words such as duty, loyalty, devotion, and honor seem as if they are defining good things.

Such words are force upon children through the public education system. And grown ups are manipulated in the same way via the networks and other media.

There are several words in the Old Testament, and several words in the New Testament that could be translated as some of the words that I just mentioned, and several English versions of the Bible do so, most words that are rendered as duty, loyalty, devotion, and honor, have very little to do with any righteous principals or characteristics.

Basically all such words are different aspects of the same thing. Ritualistic acts of worship demanded by a deity. Our English word devotion originated in the Latin language as a word meaning consecrate.

Throughout the Bible all verses about devotion to God are a good thing. All verses about devotion to something else are a bad thing. Any God that is not the creator, is not deserving of devotion. And certainly no human being, or government, would be deserving of such either.

1Peter2:17 says,

“Honor everyone. Have agape love for your brothers. Respect God. Have honor for the ruler.”

Obviously it is not wrong to show honor where honor is due, Often times, refusal to do so can have dire consequences. But we must keep a balanced view of such honor.

Mark12:17 demands that we “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” No ruler has the right to demand what rightfully can only belong to God.

Should a human ruler demand that his subjects pay him tribute in the form of a tax, then he would certainly be within his rights as one of Satan’s representatives to do so. God does not issue currency. If he did, then it would be within God’s right to demand a tax as well.

However, God does instill within us the ability to love. As such he is within his rights to demand that we pay tribute to him in the form of love.

Galatians5:15 says:

“For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself”

Then Galatians explains what qualities to look for in determining if someone is only concerned with themselves.

“enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, dissension, division, envy, and control of others” All qualities related to competition.

It also explains what to look for in determining if someone is filled with the Holy Spirit,

“love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and control of self;”

None of these qualities would benefit someone that is competetive.

Even loyalty can be a bad thing. The only person that we are ever told to be loyal to is God. In fact the Bible commands us to be loyal to God, just as he is loyal to mankind.

By definition loyalty must be unconditional. It would be foolish to be unconditionally loyal to any wicked human, or wicked government. A very famous and popular American quote is “My Country Right Or Wrong”, this perfectly defines loyalty to a race, country, government, or political party. Unconditional love without regard for what is right or wrong.

In the military, we were always reminded that it was not our business to do what was right, but to do what we were ordered to do.

It must be stated without equivocation that most of the qualities that I am talking about are condemned by God. Romans13:8 says: “Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: (and once again) for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.”

We may prefer the company of some more than others, but by definition, philia love, the preferential love that humans were designed to have is not defined as eternal. We can prefer to be in the company of one person, but on another day we can prefer to be in the company of a different person. Philia love is not the same as devotion, or loyalty.

In any case, we all need to be aware that there are two different words that end up getting translated as love in our English Bibles. They are not the same word, and they do not mean the same thing.

Even in English we have multiple words that represent different kinds of love.

We also have multiple words that represent different kinds of hate. The differences between racism, nationalism, chauvinism, and patriotism, would be somewhat like the differences that exist between words like enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, dissensions, divisions, envy and control of others, but as Galatians15:20 indicates, they would still be the same thing.


If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.


Hello, and welcome to another video from the only channel that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be about mammon.

If you have been watching my videos for a while, then you probably recognize that the information that you hear from me is unlike anything that can be found anywhere else, and today will be no different. In fact, you need to understand before I even get started that what you are about to hear, has not been revealed to mankind for thousands of years. Even though, it has always been there. Hidden in plain sight.

There seems to be quite a bit of debate about exactly how mammon should be translated, but that doesn’t mean that an accurate understanding can’t be had. As we approach the last days, more and more is being revealed to those of us who patiently await the restoration of God’s Kingdom.

Part of Jesus’ “Sermon On The Mount”, Matthew6:24 says, No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

This is how the verse appears in the King James English version of the Bible, and yet, mammon is not an English word. At least it isn’t a modern English word.

People speaking Olde English may have had a better understanding of just what mammon was, but from what I have uncovered, even in Olde English mammon did not mean what Jesus was trying to convey.

In our day most people understand that mammon has something to do with money, due to the fact that many modern English translations render it as money, or gold, or treasure, or wealth.

Why Jesus used this word, or where he could have learned it is supposedly unknown. Ancient cultures around the world had within their vocabularies the word mammon, or words very similar to mammon defined in all of the ways that Bible translators have rendered it, and yet, every Bible reference book produced by Christendom, and Judaism says that this word does not exist anywhere in any ancient Hebrew document produced prior to the first century. it is found nowhere in the Old Testament, and other than the few times that Jesus mentioned it, the word mammon is not used by any other New Testament Bible figure.

In some parts of the world and at different times in human history, people seemed to use the word mammon to mean things that were unrelated to any monetary system, such as pride, gluttony, materialism, unjust worldly gain, and greed. It is obvious from the way that this word has been used historically that mammon could mean different things according to the surrounding text.

Even though we are told that the word appears nowhere in the old testament, I thought that it would be a good idea to check and see if there were any ancient Hebrew words that were close, just to see if perhaps some of those words might hold the key to figuring out what mammon actually was.

What I discovered, is that contrary to Church Doctrine, mammon is for a fact found in the Old Testament. Not only that, but in the King James Bible, mammon is translated as treasure.

Right about now, you should be asking yourself, why theologians are so reluctant to share this information with us, and if you will simply watch this video to it’s end, you will find out.

The Hebrew version of the word is actually matmown Strong’s H4301, and according to Strong’s is more precisely translated as hidden treasure. Matmown is used five times in the Old Testament, in five different books, written by five different men. (Genesis43:23, Job3:21, Proverbs2:4, Isaiah45:3, and Jeremiah41:8)

At Genesis43:23, the first use of the word matmown reveals something that will be extremely helpful in deciphering the true meaning of the word mammon as used by Jesus.

“Peace to you, do not be afraid. Your God and the God of your father has put treasure in your sacks for you. I received your money.”

This verse uses the word matmown translated as treasure, but also uses the word keceph Strong’s H3701, which translates as money. Should we accept that keceph is money, then we have to understand that matmown can not mean the same thing as keceph.

In researching the information for this video, I had to learn as much as I could about the history of money. I wanted to find out about the similarities in weights and measures and metals used in producing the coins and the monetary units, or names of the coins, of as many of the empire’s mentioned in the Bible as I possibly could, but just by coincidence, I learned something much more important.

The key to deciphering the information that you are going to hear today came from an article discussing the origins of the banking system.

The very first banks in all of recorded history were begun in ancient Egypt. People who made deposits into the banks would receive what we today would call deposit slips and their information would be recorded by the Banker. If they made a withdrawal they would have to give a receipt to the banker in the form of what we would call a check. If they wished to make a withdrawal but had no money in the bank, they would have to take out a loan. Those using the system would have to pay tribute in the form of interest. That interest would become the property of the state, and would fund civil engineering projects, pay for the maintenance of the government, and of course pay those who worked at the bank.

The coin of the realm at the time was grain. The system made perfect sense. Anyone could have stored their own grain, but by using the states storage facilities, they would know that their grain would be rotated out, so as to maintain the freshness of the grain.

In other words, if a farmer were to produce a ten year surplus, and stored it himself, he knew that he would eventually have to eat some ten year old grain. But if he stored it with grain from someone that had experienced crop failure, he knew that his grain would serve the local community, and when he had no grain, he would still have access to grain that had been harvested by farmers more fortunate than himself.

But it was also the nations tax base, and even if a farmer did not want to use the system, he would be forced to do so by law. Just like in our day, a percentage of every crop would be collected by the state as an income tax. The Egyptian banking system would take care of this automatically.

Using the Egyptian Banking system worked very much like a modern day insurance policy against hunger. It also worked to maintain the grain under the best conditions possible. The very first vaults in all of recorded history were those necessary for storing that grain.

The Egyptians called those huge underground vaults, matmown. In fact the first mention of the word in our Bibles at Genesis43:23 is a quote from a Hebrew man that was sold into slavery to the Egyptian Empire, and eventually rose to become the second most powerful man in all of the world. His name was Joseph, and he was put in charge of the Egyptian Banking System by Pharaoh.

Joseph was promoted to his position because Pharaoh was able to perceive that he had the gift of prophecy. God revealed to Joseph that Egypt was about to experience seven years of abundance, followed by seven years of famine. It was only because of Joseph that the Egyptian people were saved through what could have been a catastrophe.

Supposedly there is nothing in secular history to confirm that this actually happened, but a huge carved stone called the “Famine Stella” speaks of a Pharaoh named Djoser, who saved Egypt from a seven year famine. Djoser is possibly the Egyptian version of the Hebrew name Yowceph, which would be the word that we translate into our English name Joseph.

This stone is used by atheist as evidence that the Bible was plagiarized from Egyptian mythology. Leaders of the religion of Christianity have taken a stand against the opinions presented by the leaders of the religion of Atheism. But for those of us who, are not involved in religion, it seems obvious that what is recorded in The Bible, and what is recorded on the “Famine Stella”, are possibly just two different accounts of the same event. We won’t know for sure one way or another until after the resurrection of the dead.

Because of the Bible, we can say for certain that the very first banker in all of recorded history was the son of Israel named Joseph. He may not have invented underground vaults, but prior to the Bible account of the famine, no records from any culture anywhere mentioned anyone doing what Joseph did.

Unbeknownst to himself, Joseph had created a system of banking that would serve every Empire that would exist all the way up into our modern day.

If we examine the historic records of every empire that has ever existed, we can see a direct line of descent all the way from The Egyptian grain reserves to The Federal Reserve. What Joseph did was much more significant than stockpiling grain for a seven year famine. By the time the famine had ended, and the grain had run out, Joseph had replace all of the grain in those vaults with precious metals.

Jacob’s tribesmen were not Egyptian, and as such were not members of the Egyptian Banking System. They could not simply make withdrawals of grain, they had to buy into the system, and the only thing that they had was gold and silver. They were apparently not the only ones.

According to Genesis 41:56, and 57:

“The famine became bad everywhere in Egypt, so Joseph opened the storehouses and sold the grain to the Egyptians. People from all over the world came to Egypt to buy grain, because the famine was so severe in their countries.”

By the end of the seven years, what little grain was left was used to grow more grain. The vaults of Egypt had been emptied, but in Joseph’s possession was all of the gold of Egypt, and all of the Gold of all of the surrounding nations. It could be said, that by the time that the famine had ended, Joseph had in his possession nearly every ounce of gold, that mankind had ever taken from the Earth.

There is no way of knowing just how much gold that would have been. But, the Bible repeatedly mentions the Gold over and over again beginning in Genesis, and ending in Revelation, and secular history records that much of what is recorded in The Bible is accurate.

Many of the people that traveled to Egypt when the famine broke out, ran out of gold, before they ran out of famine. Not only were they forced to hand over all of their material wealth in order to survive. But once their wealth had run out they had to take out loans.

Hundreds of years later the descendants of those original famine survivors were still enslaved to the Egyptian banking system, with little hope of ever escaping the slavery that they had inherited from their parents. God took note of this injustice, and chose a man from the house of Pharaoh to deliver the slave labor force of the Egyptian Empire.

Many of those people could trace their ancestry all the way back to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The tribal associations that were recognized in Moses’ day were based on the names of the 12 son’s of Jacob. The man that God chose was one of those descendants named Moses.

Although Moses was a Hebrew, he had been adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter. Most are familiar with the story of Moses due to it’s preservation by the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Others are familiar with the account, because several popular movies have been produced over the years based on the story of Moses delivering his people from slavery. But not too many people are familiar with what happened to that gold.

God rescued the nation of Israel from Egyptian bondage in a very dramatic way. Initially Pharaoh refused to allow Moses to take his people out of Egypt, because as the Bible says, The Hebrews, made up a huge portion of the nation’s slave labor force. But after a series of very dramatic plagues, shut down the entire Egyptian Empire, Pharaoh submitted to Moses’ request.

Egypt was ruled by the descendants of those people who were fortunate enough to have spent the seven years of plenty storing up their grain. Over time, those who entered Egypt without grain had been completely stripped of all of their material wealth, and when that wealth ran out, they were finally stripped of their freedom. Most of the worlds ruling elite today acquired their power in a similar fashion.

To anyone who has ever read the Bible, it is obvious that forgiveness of debts is a major part of God’s personality, and as such he expects those of us who he has forgiven to willingly forgive others.

Forgiveness of debts was written into the Law of Moses, but more importantly it was part of natural law. This concept was so important that when Jesus was asked by his listeners how to pray? He told them to pray,

“Forgive us our debts as we forgive others.” (Matthew6:12)

Apparently the Egyptian hierarchy had never considered forgiving the debts of the Hebrew people. We can only imagine that they were just as selfish, as our current world rulers. But God was going to teach them how to do the right thing.

By the time that the final plague had ended, the Egyptians were ready and willing to grant freedom to their slave labor force. It is unlikely that they felt remorse over their treatment of the children of Israel, but it is more than obvious that they wanted them gone.

Leading Israel into a system of perpetual debt slavery may have seemed like a good idea, initially, but in the end the Egyptians were forced to realize that their social hierarchy had it’s drawbacks.

According to Exodus 12:36,

“And the LORD gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they lent unto them such things as they required. And they spoiled the Egyptians.”

As originally recorded in Hebrew, this verse is not about lending anything, and it is definitely not about a gift. The word used here is sha’al Strong’s H7592, which means that the Egyptians gave in to the demands of the Israel.

Another word that indicates that this was not voluntary, is natsal, or waynaselu Strong’s H5337. Which is rendered in the King James Version as spoiled, but in other versions as stripped, carried away, or plundered.

This word has much more force to it than most people understand. This word indicates that what Israel did to Egypt was what was normally done by victors in a war. Israel literally stripped the entire nation of all of it’s resources, including as verse 35 says, their gold, and their silver.

Most understand that after allowing Israel to leave, Pharaoh had a change of heart, but what the Churches are not telling us, is why. Once Pharaoh realized that Moses’ people were carrying away the entire basis for the Egyptian economic system, he likely felt that he had no choice.

The story of the gold does not end there. When Moses ascended Mount Sinai to receive the Stone Tablets Of The Law, his brother Aaron used the gold plundered from Egypt to make a golden calf, in order to worship it.

The Bible does not say how much of the gold was used. It could have been a small portion of the gold plundered from Egypt, or they may have used all of it. But the Bible does tell us that when Moses saw what the Israelites were doing, he destroyed the tablets that God had given him, destroyed the golden calf, ground it up, put it in water, and forced the people to drink it. (Exodus32:20)

In any case shortly after being forced to ingest the gold, the Bible records that they started making other golden objects of worship. There can only be two possible explanations for this. Either they had more gold, or they sifted through their feces and recovered the Gold that Moses had forced them to swallow.

If we read the Bible with an open mind, and try to forget everything that the Churches teach about God’s so called “Chosen” people, it would be hard to imagine those Israelites walking past those glistening turds, sparkling in the sunlight day after day, without taking positive action to rescue them from the elements.

After worshiping the Golden calf, the nation entered into a covenant with God to engage in an annual cycle of rituals very similar to the cycle of rituals practiced by the surrounding nations. Most of the articles used in their worship were made with gold including their most venerated sacred object, The Ark Of The Covenant.

As history marched on, more and more gold was taken from the Earth and mankind’s stockpile continued to grow. Around the world the power and prestige of kings was being measured by the amount of gold that they possessed. The wealthiest king alive at that time was named Solomon.

Solomon inherited the Kingdom of Israel, from his father David. As King of Israel, David had never really craved gold, and there is nothing in the Bible to indicate that his Empire was dependent on the amount of Gold in his treasury. Much of what is recorded about David indicates that he placed his trust in his God.

Much of what Solomon wrote about his God indicates that like his father he put his trust in God, but if we read everything that Solomon wrote, and compare that to what others wrote about him, he was obviously divided in his loyalties.

The Bible says that Solomon worshiped many gods.(Kings11:19) And the God that he seemed to worship the most was gold. As they say, actions speak louder than words, and when we compare what Solomon said to what Solomon did, it is very obvious that his primary mission in life was to acquire as much gold as possible.

The way that he accomplished this goal was by imposing a very severe tax on the people. And according to the Bible, the gold that he demanded was a very specific amount.

2Chronicles9:13 says:

“Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon annually was 666 talents of gold, besides that which the explorers and merchants brought. And all the kings of Arabia and the governors of the land brought gold and silver to Solomon.”

Even thought the gold that Israel had in their treasuries had grown day by day, over hundreds of years, mixed in with all of that gold, was the original gold that their ancestors had first used to purchase the grain that was stored in those Egyptian matmown. Which of course was part of the gold that they had plundered from the Egyptians as they left. And the gold that they had used to make the golden calf.

In Solomon’s own words “I gathered me also silver and gold and the peculiar treasure of Kings.”(Ecclesiastes2:8)

According to the ten commandments mankind was required to rest every seventh day. That seventh day was called the Sabbath. But according to the Law of Moses there was also to be a sabbath year.

But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land, a sabbath for the LORD: thou shalt neither sow thy field, nor prune thy vineyard.(Leviticus 25:4)

If we keep in mind that Solomon received the tax of 666 talents of gold every year, then we have to conclude that either Solomon had declared an end to the Sabbath, or his people had found some way to pay taxes without working.

Many English translations of the Bible lead us to believe that Gold over time will rust away. Fortunately for us God’s word in it’s original languages says no such thing. Gold is the least reactive of all metals. Exposure to Oxygen does not cause it to rust. Gold is not radioactive. All of the Gold that exist in nature is the same gold that was here when the Earth was created. The only way for gold to go away would be through theft, loss or depreciation.

When God’s patiences had finally run out, he delivered The Kingdom of Judah into the hands of the Babylonians. Under King Nebuchadnezzar, General Nebuzaradin entered the city exterminated many of the inhabitants, destroyed the temple, and plundered the treasury of Judah, just as Israel had plundered the Egyptians hundreds of years earlier.

All of the gold that the nation had been hording for all those hundreds of years, was carted off in a day, and carried out to a place called Dura, where it was stacked into a massive pile that would have been taller than most buildings that existed at that time.

According to the Bible description it was a tall thin structure, about 9 feet wide, and standing 90 feet tall. Although, we can not know what that structure looked like for certain, most depictions that artists have created over the years resemble an obelisk.

It is reasonable to assume that Nebuchadnezzar’s idol would have been an obelisk, because thousands of tall thin structures have been found all around the world dating back to that time period, and all of them are obelisks.

It should be obvious to anyone that has ever read the Bible that the people of Israel were no different than most of the people that live in our day, in that they lusted after gold. In the Bible, their behavior is rightfully referred to as worship. But once Nebuchadnezzar erected his tower, the worship of gold became mandatory. Those captured Jews were forced by law to bow down in worship to that pile of metal.

“And the herald proclaimed aloud, “You are commanded, O peoples, nations, and languages, that when you hear the sound of the musical instruments, you are to fall down and worship the golden image that King Nebuchadnezzar has erected. And whoever does not fall down and worship shall immediately be cast into a burning fiery furnace.” (Daniel3:4-6)

That calf of gold that the children of Israel had voluntarily worshiped hundreds of years earlier stood before them once again, it had grown in size, and had been reshaped but, even still, they were once again, bowing down to serve it.

There is much more to this story. Not everyone was willing to worship the gold. Just as Moses had refused to bow to the Golden Calf, in his day, three men named Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, refused to bow down to the Golden Calf in the form that it took in their day.

Eventually God’s servant Nebuchadnezzar died and was replaced. Belshazzar, his son took over and the Babylonian Empire became just as corrupt as the Kingdom of Judah, years earlier.

God chose Cyrus The Great, Ruler of the Persian Empire to do to Babylon, what Babylon had previously done to Judah, just as Israel had done to Egypt in Moses’ day. Cyrus and his armies entered the city and in a single night conquered, and plundered Babylon.

As Isaiah45:1-3 records:

“Thus says the Lord to his anointed one, Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him and to loose the belts of kings, and open doors before him that gates may not be closed. I shall go before you and level the exalted places. I will break in pieces the doors of bronze, and cut through the bars of iron, I will give you the treasures of darkness, and the hoards in secret places, that you may know that it is I, the Lord, God of Israel, who call you by your name.

To most people the single most significant fact about this passage as recorded in English, is that Isaiah was able to name the man who would conquer Babylon before it ever happened. In other words many believe that the Bible named Cyrus as the man that would conquer Babylon, before Cyrus was even born. This has been a point of contention between the religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Atheism for many years.

Such foolish arguments serve no purpose other than to keep people from discovering the part of this passage that is truly significant. At verse 3, the word that is translated as treasures of darkness, is once again matmown. The same word used to describe those original underground vaults of grain, was now being used by God to describe the vaults used by Babylon for storing it’s silver and gold. This same word would be used by Jesus some 700 years later.

Much is written about gold in the Books that make up our Bibles. But information about what happened to the Mammon that began in ancient Egypt abruptly comes to an end with Cyrus the Great, the ruler of the Persian Empire. When Cyrus freed the Jews from Babylonian Captivity, the Bible says at Ezra1:2-4:

“Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his people? his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of the LORD God of Israel, (he is the God,) which is in Jerusalem. And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold.”

The Bible does not say how much gold the Jews took with them when they left Babylon, but it does record that by decree they were to be given gold.

Alexander The Great eventually conquered Persia, which began with a decisive victory over Darius himself at The Battle of Issus in 333BC. Alexander also conquered Judah at about the same time. Meaning that we can assume that the entire basis for the world banking system would change hands once again.

When Jesus was born, Greece had been conquered by Rome. Since Judah was a part of Alexander’s Empire, by default Judah had become part of The Roman Empire. When Jesus warned against trying to serve God and mammon, the mammon that he was talking about would obviously have been under the control of the Roman Empire.

Alexander’s Empire started out with very little gold, but after conquering Persia, controlled more gold than any other nation on the Earth. Rome started out in much the same way, and in similar fashion held control over more gold than any other nation on Earth, after usurping The Greek Empire.

There are quite a few Conspiracy Theorists who have dedicated a considerable bit of effort into tracking Solomon’s gold. Since much of what is understood about the gold involves secret societies, and ancient history, there really isn’t any way to say for sure exactly where that gold ended up, but if we simply examine which nations used gold as the basis of their economies, and who historically held the largest depositories of gold, it is easy to see a direct connection between reality and what those conspiracy theorists are saying. To a point.

The vast majority of the Earth’s nations belong to what is called the central banking system. Meaning that even though every country produces it’s own currency and maintains their own banking systems, all of those banks are just parts of the central banking system.

So, just as in the days of Jacob, when Egypt controlled the entire world economy with their grain reserves, The Central Banking System controls the entire world economy in our day.

It could be said that that the great depression of Jacob’s day put an end to the grain standard. Thousands of years later in 1929 another depression would put an end to the gold standard. Currently, depending on who you ask, it could be said that our world economy is based on either the paper standard, or the virtual standard.

When the coin of the realm was grain, it could be said that the world economy was real. The money that existed at that time was actually useful. In fact the grain in those vaults proved to be life saving.

But, suddenly the grain in those vaults was gone, and the precious metals that replaced it had no real value at all. It was shiny. It was durable. And obviously it was perceived as valuable by the wicked people who craved it. But the reality was and is, that it was fake. In a famine, grain would be every bit as valuable today as it was in Jacob’s day. But in a famine, even wicked people would soon find out that gold in and of itself has no value whatsoever.

Since going on the paper standard, it can now be said that paper money, which is fake, represents gold which is fake, which represents grain which is real. And when you take into consideration that the vast majority of paper money only exist in cyberspace, it has to be admitted that our current world economy is represented by something that doesn’t even exist, but which represents something that is fake, which was produced to represent something fake, to represent grain.

Even though what is recorded about the world economy is not historically complete, it is spiritually complete. Decent human beings know instinctively that the monetary system is evil. And the Bible confirms many times, and in many ways that this instinctive belief is correct.

It is a fact that Rome is not the current ruling world power. Hundreds of years ago, The British Empire succeeded in replacing Rome, and acquiring most of the worlds wealth. Eventually the British Empire split in two, and most of the worlds wealth ended up in the hands of the American Empire.

Those who engage in the religion of Patriotism argue about who currently controls mammon, The Federal Reserve is a British entity. But professes to be an American entity. Knowing that no one can serve both God and mammon, we as a people don’t care who Satan is using to control his mammon.

If your version of the Bible renders the word mammon as money, treasure, or gold, you can rest assured that what your Bible is telling you is close enough. Probably after listening to the information in this video, you understand much about the relationship between money and mammon better than anyone else alive. But in the next video in this series, we are going to find out even more.

When Jesus spoke of mammon, he was revealing much more than even what you have learned so far.

Please make sure to watch the next video in this series, “Modern Mammon”

If you don’t want to survive……. Don’t listen to me.

Keep Your Eye Simple.

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only channel that you need to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today I’m going to be talking about Matthew 6:22.

“The light of the body is the eye. If therefore, thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.”

As of late, most of my Bible videos have been based on questions from subscribers, and this one is no different. A while ago I found this, question in my email.

“Could keeping the eye single mean keeping an open mind?”

Initially, I couldn’t understand why anyone would interpret this verse in this way. But after looking at the surrounding text, this understanding seemed to make more sense than anything that I had ever heard from the churches. Perhaps I needed to reconsider what I had always been taught about this verse.

I had been hearing this passage being quoted by clergymen for years, and understood instantly that Jesus was telling his listeners not to do things the same way that everyone else was doing things. But I also knew that this particular passage was worded in a rather odd way. Maybe there was some hidden message related to the concept of a single eye.

Knowing that “The All Seeing Eye” symbol that Satan uses to represent his civilization has been around since long before Jesus was born, and since that symbol is still a very prominent representation of Satan’s civilization today, I felt that what Jesus was saying was likely somehow related to that symbol.

The “All Seeing Eye” that I am referring to is the eye on the capstone of the pyramid, that is found on the back of the US one dollar bill. That symbol plays a large part in our ability to understand the Bible narrative.

The “All Seeing Eye” which is also known as the “Eye Of Providence” in it’s most basic form, is depicted as a single eye inside of a triangle. The three sides of the triangle represents the foundation stones of all civilizations that have ever existed on the Earth.

Those three sides have always stood for the governmental system, economic system, and religious system of each and every empire that has ever been established. Each of those foundation stones could not exist without the other two.

The governmental system very obviously is what it is. The government makes and enforces the laws that control what it’s citizens can and cannot do, as well as enforcing laws about what it’s citizens must do.

Since all human governments go against God’s natural law, most human beings by their very nature will not voluntarily do what the government requires of them. A system of punishment and reward had to be established in order to manipulate mankind into obedience.

That system is what we today call the economy. The purpose of the economic system is to reward those who are most in compliance with Satan’s other unnatural systems. The economy also punishes those that are not. The economy has at it’s disposal, control over employment, commerce, incarceration, and the military.

Religion is the system that civilization has established to manipulate it’s citizens into believing in the government and economy. Most people think of religion as the traditional organizations claiming to represent the creator, but few recognize the other nontraditional religions as such, even though they require as much faith as the traditional religions.

All propaganda systems would qualify as religions, including the religions represented by science, and the networks.

All humans have built in instinctive behaviors that are in direct conflict with the vile behaviors that define civilization, such as consumerism. Religion uses deception as a means of manipulating human beings into overcoming their natural inhibitions against doing harm.

The very first civilization ever established on the Earth was founded in what is now Egypt. The oldest examples of the All Seeing Eye, are associated with the Egyptian Empire. Ancient representations of the All Seeing Eye, have been found all around the world, and are still being produced in our day.

If we look at the verses surrounding Matthew 6:22, it would seem as if having an open mind might fit in perfectly with the other instructions that Jesus gave in this passage, but I was relatively certain that this verse in it’s original ancient Greek could reveal much more.

In just the last ten years or so, more and more, I have been discovering that much of what is taught by the religions is often times intentionally deceptive. And the mistranslation of our English versions of the Bible is a large part of that deception.

I have learned that if Bible translators disagree on how to render a specific word, or passage, it is usually a good indication that someone in authority is trying to hide something. Seemingly in many cases, the thing that they are hiding, is nothing more than their ignorance.

If we look at the way that Matthew 6:22 is rendered into English, it would almost seem as if Jesus is speaking favorably about the concept of the single eye that represents Satan’s civilization.

The word in question in this particular verse is single. I had always been raised to believe that this word was simple, as in “Keep your eye simple”. And this rendering seemed to fit in well, with the Church teaching that this verse is about rejecting materialism. According to Christianity, Keeping our eye simple, is a reminder not to crave too many things. A simple lifestyle obviously would be more in line with the teachings of the Bible.

This passage is part of the “Sermon On The Mount” and if you read the entire account, it seems as if a lesson against materialism would fit right in. However, even with the surrounding text, it would be very difficult to say one way or another what a single, or simple eye could possibly represent.

The actual word used at this verse is haplous. (Strong’s G573) It seems as if from earliest times translators were in agreement that this word is formed from the two words alpha (Strong’s G1) and pleko (Strong’s G4120). I know that alpha pleko does not sound like haplous, and probably those ancient Greek speaking people would not have thought of this word in such a way either.

If the Empire’s translators were right, than the first half of this word alpha would have simply been a letter. In English the word alphabet is based on the first two letters in the ancient Greek language. Alpha, and Beta. Our English letter A is based on the Greek letter Alpha.

In English we still use the letter A as a prefix meaning without. Words such as typical, and symmetrical become opposites when the prefix A is added. Atypical means not typical. Asymmetrical means not symmetrical.

But in this form the word haplous has the prefix equal to our English H-A, which in Greek would mean with or together. H-A is not the same as A.

The second half of the word, pleko, means plaited or braided. In fact our English word plait evolved from the Greek world pleko. This word is only used at one incident recorded in three separate books of the Bible. Matthew, Mark, and John all report that on the day of his death, Roman soldiers braided or pleko a crown of thorns to place on Jesus’ head as a way of mocking his status as King of the Jews.

According to most Bible reference material, the reason that this word is translated as single is because alpha braided, means singular in purpose. Perhaps fully dedicated. Or unmovable in one’s faith.

One possible explanation for why Bible translators can not agree on what this word means, may be that Jesus was being intentionally cryptic. There isn’t anything in the text to confirm that those listening to Jesus understood what he was talking about. Jesus often said things that were difficult to understand in order to make his listeners think. And to keep his enemies from catching on to the deeper meaning of what he was saying.

But just like the masses today, we can imagine that everyone in the crowd would have been nodding their heads in agreement, as if they understood, when if fact they may have had no idea what Jesus was talking about.

In our day, whenever priests, preachers, pastors, and elders, address their congregations and remind them to “Keep their eye single” everyone warming a pew will nod their heads in agreement, as if they understand, and agree, that keeping one’s eye single is a very good thing to do, even though they have absolutely no idea what the speaker standing before them is talking about.

Since Jesus’ time, nothing has really changed.

Just like us, they would have figured out that Jesus was telling them to keep their eye “braided together”. But for the average person, such a comment might not have meant anything.

At Luke 11:34, we get a better understanding of this word because Luke records something that Matthew did not.

“The light of the body is your eye, therefore when your eye is braided together your entire body will be enlightened, but when your eye is evil, your entire body will be in darkness.”

It would not be wrong for us to conclude, that haplous, or braided together, at least in this instance, is the opposite of evil.

We can confirm that the original word used here, poneros (Strong’s G4190) is similar to our English word evil, because that is how it is consistently used throughout the Bible. And where it is used, it always makes logical sense. But that does not mean that haplous is the Greek word normally translated as good. That word would be agathos (Strong’s G18)

Jesus’ use of the word haplous is rather odd when compared to other passages wherein he is speaking about the distinction between good and evil. In all of those instances Jesus used the Greek words porneros and agathos. Even when speaking about the good eye, and evil eye, at Matthew 20:15.

“Isn’t it rightful for me to do what I want, with what belongs to me? Or Is your eye evil because mine is good?”

Jesus’ use of the Greek word that means, interwoven, intertwined, or braided together does not sound like anything that would be said in normal conversation, about the distinction between good and evil. At least not in English.

I was only able to find a single reference to anyone anywhere else ever using this word, and that reference was found in a papyrus, outside of the Bible, describing a marriage dowry. I imagine that somehow the word haplous must have been related to unifying the two families of a husband and wife.

Another word that Jesus chose to use in this account, that would sound odd to a modern English speaker would be the word eye. Everybody understands the difference between singular and plural. Singular nouns are always about a single thing. Plural nouns are always used to describe more than one. Since humans have two eyes, we should wonder why Jesus would use the singular word eye, when speaking of something that people very obviously have two of.

If this verse is about materialism, as the churches claim, or even if this verse is about keeping an open mind, we should wonder why Jesus used the singular form of the word eye.

Jesus would have understood how to speak Greek, and would obviously have understood the distinction between singular and plural nouns. At many other verses such as Matthew13:15, and Luke10:23, Jesus did not use the singular noun eye, but instead used the plural form of the word. What in English would be translated as eyes.

Throughout, the Bible the word eye is used in both it’s singular and plural forms. But anytime that it appears in it’s singular form, it always seems to have a special significance related to motives, or intention. In other words how we perceive things. Or how we “SEE” things. Do we perceive things properly, or do we perceive things improperly.

Another word used in this passage which is always translated in a less than accurate way, is the word light itself, which most English Bibles translate as lamp. Lichnos (Strong’s G3088) does not mean light. And although most Bibles render this word as lamp, lichnos in English would be better understood if it were consistently rendered as oil lamp. This difference may seem inconsequential, but as seekers of truth, we should want our English Bibles to render this word in such a way as to accurately represent what Jesus said.

Since the Greek word lichnos means oil lamp, there really isn’t any justification for the Empire’s translators to render it any other way.

Oil Lamps require oil in order to produce light. Since the original writers recorded that that the eye was an oil lamp, at these two verses, then we the readers should be allowed to know that they did.

To anyone reading the Bible, it is very obvious that lamps are often used when speaking metaphorically of the sun, the moon, the planets, the stars and even people. And even the fuel required by lamps has deep significance within the pages of the Bible. Oil is repeatedly used for anointing. Specifically for anointing important Bible figures.

Jesus himself was anointed on at least one occasion, and depending on how someone understands the verses describing his anointing, he was possibly anointed multiple times. On one of those occasions, Judas objected, because he was a thief, and wanted the proceeds from the sale of the oil for himself.

“Why was this ointment not sold, and the money given to the poor?” He asked. (John 12:4-6)

Judas obviously was not concerned with the intrinsic value of the oil, but only concerned with it’s economic value. As the Bible clearly brings out, Judas was a thief. The wicked always think of things monetarily. Even assigning an economic value to people.

When Judas said what he did, he was not just assigning an economic value to the oil, he was also assigning an economic value to Jesus. In his mind Judas understood that Jesus would not have had enough money to purchase the oil that was used. And hence Jesus did not deserve the oil.

Most people think like Judas. Over the course of my life, I have heard many of the citizens of the current world empire speaking of the economic value of people in a similar fashion. The mindless drones of civilization will often express a deep hatred for anyone receiving government subsidized food, telephones, or medical care, as if only those with enough money should be allowed to have such things.

This tendency is the reason why Satan’s Empire pays some people less for their labor than others. In the Bible, assigning different economic values to people, is called judging. Jesus addressed this tendency at verses such as Matthew7:1.

“Judge Not Lest Thous Be Judged”

This command of Jesus’ is about acknowledging a person’s position within Satan’s artificial hierarchy. Most people falsely believe that this verse is about judging whether or not a person is wicked. When in fact it is about assigning a social or economic value to a person.

If we think about the overall effects of the economy on the lives of those who are subject to it, a much more basic definition of our social hierarchy would be theft. Most ancient cultures acknowledge the relationship that exists between theft and the economy in their so called mythologies.

The Roman God Mars, which most people would recognize as the God of war, was also the god of the economy and the god of theft. The economy is nothing more than a complicated smoke and mirrors system of theft. God knows this, and so did Jesus.

In our Bibles, both people, and objects were anointed with oil. In other instances men are said to be anointed even though no oil is mentioned. Some men, such as Saul were only anointed with oil once. David was anointed with oil on three different occasions. Sometimes our English translations use the word anointed for the act of pouring oil over someone’s head, or rubbing oil on a persons entire body, sometime this word is used when a person only has parts of their body rubbed with oil.

Jesus had his feet anointed, his head anointed, his entire body anointed at his death. But of primary concern for us, would be his anointing with holy spirit.

In the original languages not all of these anointings are the same. In fact most of these words are not even linguistically related in any way. In the past, I have said that anointed means chosen, but the words chosen and anointed in the original languages are not the same either.

There are obvious connections between all of the things that I am talking about, when we examine the deeper meaning of the text. But linguistically, there isn’t any connection at all.

The word anointed in Ancient Greek is chrio. (Strong’s G5548) This is where we get the word Christos, (Strong’s G5547) which translates into our English word Christ. In the Old Testament this word is rendered as anointed, or messiah, from the Hebrew word mashiyach (Strong’s H4899)

In the United States, a very popular brand of vegetable shorting is called Crisco based on the Greek word for anointing oil. One of the first names chosen for this product was Cryst, spelled with a Y. But prior to placing their product on the market, the name Crisco was chosen to avoid offending religious people.

If we were to translate Luke11:34 into modern English, in such a way as to accurately represent what Jesus would have been communicating, it would sound something like this:

“Your body’s eye, is your body’s oil lamp. Hence, when your eye is interwoven, your whole body will be filled with light. However if your eye is evil, your whole body will be filled with darkness. It is up to you to determine whether or not your light is actually darkness”.

Now that we know accurately what is being said in this passage it is going to be much easier to determine what is meant.

As part of the creation story, Satan tells Eve something about her eyes that reveals how an eye can be evil. At Genesis 3:1-5 Eve and Satan have a conversation that most will be familiar with.

“Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

According to what is written here, the very first verse in the Bible to tell us anything about the eyes, very clearly states that the reason that God did not want Eve to eat from the tree that was in the midst of the garden,was somehow related to being able to understand both good and evil.

At Revelation 12:9 it is revealed that Satan himself was the original serpent. In the course of his ministry, Jesus declared Satan to be a liar. That being the case we would not want to base anything that we believe, on the teachings of Satan.

But since that tree is called the tree of good and evil at several other verses and there is an association between the eyes, plural, and understanding good and evil, we need to keep that relationship on our minds as we think about the subject of this video.

Having two eyes, associated with the two conflicting concepts of good and evil, fits in perfectly with Jesus’ teaching of our eye, singular, being either good or evil. All that we need to determine is why Jesus associated good with being braided together? And if a braided together eye is good, braided together with what?

At 2Corinthians11:3 Paul spoke about Satan deceiving Eve, and he said something that is the key to understanding exactly what the single eye is all about.

“I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to the anointed one.”

The word sincere in this verse is translated from the Greek word haplotes, Strong’s G572. Haplotes is formed from the word haplous that is the subject of this video. Paul very obviously was associating Satan’s deception with an unbraiding of the eyes. A more accurate rendering of this verse would involve a more accurate rendering of the word haplotes.

“I am concerned that just as the serpent used his cunning to deceive Eve, your thoughts will be unbraided and led astray from your devotion to the anointed one.”

Since both of our eyes were created by God, neither can truly be wicked. Someone with only one eye can only perceive height and width. Someone with both eyes can also perceive depth. Having two eyes serves a very important purpose. God never intended for man to live without depth perception.

When Jesus said that our eye should be braided together he was obviously speaking about our evil eye being braided together with our good eye, in order that we could be complete.

Keeping in mind that Jesus said, If your eye is haplous your whole body will be filled with light was obviously a reference to the fact that more light will enter the body through two eyes, than can enter through just one.

At Galatians Chapter 5 Paul speaks at great length about people who are wicked and people who are righteous. He refers to wicked people as being “Of The Flesh”, while referring to people who are righteous as being “Of The Spirit”.

As rendered into English these verses are just confusing enough to allow the Churches to associate wickedness with things such as sex, drugs, and rock n roll, while associating righteousness with other characteristics, more in line with Church policies.

But in general, if we look at some of the characteristics as originally intended, we can see a comparison similar to the comparison between the single eye, and the interwoven eye.

Galatians 5:19,20 in part says that “the works of the flesh are, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, and envy.” All qualities associated with selfishness. The other qualities associated with the flesh are so poorly translated into English that I had to post an entire video dedicated just to that information.

Describing selfishness as being of the flesh makes perfect sense if we take into consideration that selfish people are called selfish, because they only think of themselves. They rarely concern themselves with anything or anyone outside of their own flesh. It is as if they do not have any depth perception.

Galatians5:22,23 says, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and control of self, things against which God has no law.”

It is very clear that looking at things from both sides will always result in what is best for everyone and every thing. The wicked eye is necessary, because we have to consider what is best for us, but to anyone that is reasonable it should be obvious that we need to consider how our actions affect others as well. Each eye is every bit as important as the other.

When Jesus said that we should love our neighbor as ourselves. He did not say love your neighbor, but hate yourself. At least not in this context. Having two eyes allows us to perceive the world within us, as well as the world around us.

I do not support any of the teachings of any of mankind’s belief systems. And that includes the religion of science, and in particular medical science. But I will often refer to the religion’s of man if there is any possibility that they seemingly teach something that could potentially be correct.

Scientist teach that the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body. And the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body. I know that this sounds crazy, but there is actually quite a bit of evidence to support their claim.

In any case whether that is true or not, all that we need to know, is that it is a commonly held belief that each half of the body is controlled by a specific half of the brain. This would include our eyes. And since the body seems to be constructed in a rather symmetrical fashion, this makes perfectly good sense. In other words I do not have any grounds for questioning the belief that each eye is controlled by a different hemisphere of the brain.

Another teaching of science, that may or may not be true, but once again seems to be supported by the evidence, is the belief that one side of our brain is purely analytical while the other side is more creative.

All references to the wicked eye, could potentially be about the eye that is associated with the purely analytical half of the brain, or the eye that is associated with the creative half of the brain. If this is true, then it could explain why there are so many verses in the Bible that associate wickedness with a person using only one of their eyes. Someone only looking at something with a single point of view would be more likely to make selfish decisions.

Jesus never said that a person should stop being analytical, or stop being creative, he simply said that a wicked person should braid their two eyes together. But if we only have two eyes, how can they be braided?

If you have ever braided your hair, or a rope, then you understand that braiding requires at least three strands. If we think of our eyes according to what Jesus taught at Luke 11:34, as oil lamps, then obviously the third strand would be the oil.

Combining our two figurative eyes together with God’s Holy Spirit would very obviously remove any possibility of our being selfish. It is as if the Bible is telling us that only those who are filled with the holy spirit can see things from more than a single point of view. In effect being open minded.

At Matthew5:29 we are told:

“If your right eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into Gehenna”.

At this verse there is a direct connection between the wicked eye and the right eye.

Rather than going through the motions of trying to pick and choose which parts of the religion of science to put our faith in, so that we can determine which side of the brain controls which eye, or which side of the brain is wicked. It probably would be best to simply accept that at this verse the right eye for some reason represents wickedness.

In our day, the “Eye of Providence” also known as the “All Seeing Eye” which is the image that is found of the back of the one dollar bill, is suppose to represent the eye of God, and is supposedly drawn to appear as if it is a right eye.

Many institutions use this image in their own iconography, and even though it is very obvious that it is often a right eye that is portrayed, in many instances it is obviously a left eye that is portrayed. In some images it is impossible to tell if it is either, because it is sculpted, drawn, or painted, in such a way as to hide it’s orientation.

When Jesus was alive none of our modern images of the eye existed. Every “All Seeing Eye”, “Eye of Ra”, or “Eye of Horus” from the ancient past was a right eye. I have been told that the Eyes or Horus and Ra, or opposites. One a right eye, and the other a left, but if you look at those images, they always seem to be right eyes.

When Jesus said that it would be better to cast out our right eye, than to be cast into Gehenna with both eyes intact, he was referring to a very specific place. Gehenna in Greek was a transliteration of the Hebrew word meaning, Valley of the Sons of Lamentation.

According to all of the varying sects of Christianity, at one time there were great furnaces, sculpted in the image of Ba’al with outstretched arms leading to the belly of the furnace. The people wishing to appease Ba’al would bring their infant children to these furnaces and throw them in alive.

I have probably mentioned this in previous videos, but there really isn’t any scriptural proof that anything of the sort ever took place, and I can’t find any ancient historical records of such a thing either. Perhaps nothing of the sort ever actually happened.

The stories of the huge bronze Ba’al furnaces is likely nothing more than a contrivance of some popular clergyman looking for a way to explain the Bible verses about the Jews sacrificing their sons and daughters to Ba’al.

The valley of lamentation, as best I can figure from the Old Testament was the low area that surround Old Jerusalem. What is written in the Bible about the Valley outside of Jerusalem is that many people died there defending the city from invasions. When Jesus spoke of avoiding the fires of Gehenna he was obviously speaking about the tendency of spiritually blind people dying in defense of their countries.

Throughout the Bible Kings are spoken of as fathers. Their subjects are often spoken of as their children. Sacrificing the children of the King would be an accurate description of warfare.

Primarily it would be the lower class citizens that would be sacrificed. Even in our day it is not uncommon for rulers and their generals to send large groups of people with no way of defending themselves off to certain death.

Such a strategy can actually have some benefits in certain situations. A mass of human bodies can be quite effective at slowing down an invading army. And reducing the population, can be beneficial in extending limited resources.

In other words by eliminating people that were economically less valuable, there would be more food and water for the rich and powerful. Even in our day it is the children of the poor that are usually sacrificed to the god of carnal warfare.

Most religions translate this word Gehenna into our English word hell, in order to make this verse seem to be about sacrificing our wants in order to get into heaven. Far from it. Jesus was simply warning his listeners that a willingness to sacrifice oneself for one’s country, was evil.

According to Psalms 2:2, and Revelation 16:14, God will gather together every King, President, Prime Minister, and other governmental ruler of this world for a great extermination. But in the days leading up to that extermination, you can believe that millions will willingly die in defense of the nations, kingdoms, and empires ruled over by those political leaders.

Their deaths, just like the deaths of every soldier that has ever died in defense of some governmental system, will be just as pointless as every other death, that has ever taken place in every war that has ever been fought.

Prior to the great day of God the almighty, there can be no doubt that many of The Empire’s Patriots, will take a stand in defense of their leaders. Those honorable men and women willing to fight for their rights. Those who are defined by characteristics such as the ones described at Galatians 5:19,20, will no doubt willingly march right into the fires of Gehenna to prove their loyalty and devotion to self rule.

As Muslims are killing Christians, and Christians are killing Muslims. Democrats will be killing Republicans, and Republicans will be killing Democrats. Blacks will be killing Whites, and Whites will be killing Blacks. But if we are willing to separate ourselves from the propaganda of Civilization’s “All Seeing Eye”, we can be watching from the sidelines with both eyes. But only if we keep our eyes braided together with the Holy Spirit. Only those selfish enough to crave self rule need to die at Armageddon.

It is only a balanced view of the world around us that will allow us to see clearly what is actually going on. Only by keeping our eyes braided together, can we develop the fruit of the Spirit, which is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and control of self, things against which God has no law. Things that will keep us from getting involved with the foolishness of this world.

Satan’s Churches want us to believe that it is our Christian duty to have a single eye, a simple eye, an eye that is singular in purpose. Such characteristics are absolutely the opposite of what Jesus was communicating.

Perceiving the world around us from a single point of view, would accurately be described as having a closed mind. Satan uses all of mankind’s religions as a means of closing the minds of his followers. As 2Corinthians 4:4 states:

“The god of civilization has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of the anointed one, who is the image of God.”

Hopefully you were able to recognize in this verse, the connection that Paul made between Matthew 6:22 and our thought processes. The verse specifically uses the words blindness, sight, and light, to explain how Satan controls the minds of unbelievers.

People who are involved with religion have falsely convinced themselves that being a believer requires that they have blind faith in religion. Far from it, this verses is about believing in what our senses are telling us, and not allowing what we see to be dictated by some false belief.

If we wish to survive what is coming upon this Earth, we must keep our eyes braided together with God’s Holy Spirit. We must be able to temper what we perceive as best for ourselves with what is best for everyone. A simple, or single eye that mindlessly follows the crowd, can only get us killed. We must rid ourselves of the simple, or single eye, and develop the ability to perceive the world around us through both eyes braided together with the Holy Spirit.

As you are listening to the information in this video our world is littered with the rotting corpses of patriots from around the world, often times mixed in with the corpses of their victims. There is nothing that we can do to insure that we ourselves are not sacrificed by the Kings of the Earth, but certainly we don’t want to volunteer ourselves for such a fate.

Only those who are open minded can perceive the world as it truly is. Those who are close minded to anything that does not fit in with their own selfish desires cannot. As Jesus said at Luke11:34:

“Your body’s eye, is your body’s oil lamp. Hence, when your eye is interwoven, your whole body will be filled with light. However if your eye is evil, your whole body will be filled with darkness. It is up to you to determine whether or not your light is actually darkness”.

Satan’s mislead slaves, are perceiving the world around them through a single eye, bound by an illogical belief in the governments, the economies, and the religions of his Empire. Any light that such a person might take in will never be anything more than darkness.

If you don’t want to survive…… Don’t listen to me.