Melchizedek Part 4 Identifying The Nephilim

Hello, and welcome to another video from the only source of information that you need, to not only survive the current apocalypse, but actually enjoy it, and today’s video is going to be the fourth in my Melchizedek video series.

We are not going to be able to fully understand the significance of the roll that Melchizedek played, unless we first understand who the nephilim are, and by the end of this video, you will know more about the nephilim than anyone else alive on the Earth.

To anyone reading the Bible it is undeniable that from the very beginning the subject of race, or ethnicity seems to be a big issue. The way that the Bible carefully records family lines and the way that God separated the Israelites from the Egyptians, and then later separated the Israelites from the Canaanites makes it obvious that something significant involving lineage had to have been involved.

Even the nation of Israel itself was divided up according to family lineage. Each of the 12 family lines was given very distinct areas of the promised land to inhabit once their 40 year journey was completed. Those 12 family lines being based on the families of the 12 sons of Jacob.

This entire series is based on explaining why these divisions were so important, but today’s video is going to focus primarily on identifying the nephilim. Those individuals that depending on what version of the Bible you are reading are often called giants.

Obviously to anyone with a pure heart, and the capacity to think things through, there is no way that our creator could possibly love one race of man more than another. If God truly had a race that he preferred over the others, then logically as the creator, it would have been within his means to simply not have created the ones that he didn’t like, to begin with.

But it is also obvious that the vast majority of human beings do not have pure hearts, nor do they have the capacity to think things through.

To a racist, every verse having anything to do with the separating of the tribes of man, becomes an excuse for hatred. To a racist every verse having anything to do with God’s chosen people is perceived as proof that those who are not chosen are not as valuable as those who are. And somehow, every racist familiar with the Bible believes that their race is the one that God likes.

As I go through the verses that prove that God does not have a preference for any particular race of mankind, most of the teachings of the race based religions will be overturned. The verses that say that God loves all of us, and that we are all to love one another, are impossible to miss, easy to understand, and obvious.

The Bible verses that are used to support the claims of those who believe in racial purity, never really seem to support any kind of separation of the races as a means of pleasing God. At least not in any solid way that we would want to base our faith on.

Such passages are often difficult to understand, but even if we carefully study each word of each verse, we would never be able to associate them with any kind of racial purity agenda.

Those who believe that the Bible supports racial purity, have to have been taught to do so. No one would ever be able to come to such a conclusion simply by reading the Bible.

But there is a particular line of reasoning associated with something called the Serpent Seed doctrine, that at least on the surface, seems to actually have the support of the scriptures.

If you have ever seen anything posted about the serpent seed, then you are likely already familiar with some of the information that I am about to share with you.

According to the Bible, Eve was told that she could eat fruit from every tree that was in the garden, with the exception of a single tree that has become known as the “Tree of Knowledge of God and Bad”.

According to the serpent seed doctrine this fruit was not a literal fruit, but a euphemism for sexual intercourse. If you follow the line of reasoning that is used to support the Serpent Seed teaching, then you will pick up on the fact that much of what these people believe makes much more sense than what is taught by the traditional religions.

The activities of mankind on this Earth for nearly 6,000 years are so horrible, that many simply cannot accept that those perpetrating such acts, can be genetically similar to themselves.

It would be very easy to simply accept the serpent seed doctrine as truth were it not for the fact that every race of man, and every nation of man, and every blood type of man has been directly involved in every atrocity of man.

Since none of us who has had experience with religion wants to be drawn back into the same trap under a different name, we must remain cautious about becoming too involved with any group of people that requires us to believe in some kind of doctrine, that is not clearly spelled out in the ancient text that have been given to mankind by God.

I myself have understood from very early in my life that reproduction was somehow involved with the fall of mankind, and in fact, even since becoming SustenanceNCovering I have spoken openly about this in several videos that I have produced, including one that I had previously posted about the identity of the nephelim.

A very important first step in figuring out who the nephilim are, and why they came about, was my study of the Ten Commandments.

I knew from reading the Bible that Gods law never changes, and yet, I also knew that the law given to Adam and Eve was not like the law given to Moses. Bible passages that are found at Numbers 23:19, Hebrews 13:8, and James 1:17 all confirm that the true God’s standards do not change. After researching each and every word of the Ten Commandments, I posted a video about just that subject.

After studying the commandment found at Exodus 20:14, and comparing it to the Commandment found at Exodus 20:17 I could see that those two commandments had almost nothing to do with what I had been led to believe by the churches.

“Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery. And, Thou Shalt Not Covet Your Neighbors Wife”

Even before looking into the ancient Hebrew words used at these verses, I could see that these two commandments as understood in English obviously contradicted the lifestyles of men like Abraham, Jacob, Moses, and David who are spoken of throughout the Bible as being good examples for us to follow.

Each of these men had multiple sex partners. Their relationships with these women are openly and honestly recorded in the Bible. And never once was there anything condemnatory recorded anywhere in the Bible about those relationships.

Very obviously the words found in the ten commandments that we translate into our English words adultery and wife could not possibly be anything like our modern concept of what is adultery, and what is a wife. Otherwise, these righteous men would not have been written about in such a positive way.

Throughout the Bible Slavery is strictly prohibited. It is often difficult to see just how much God hates slavery from reading an English translation of the Bible but in the original languages it is obvious. I have produced several videos addressing this issue.

In any case, most of what God hates about slavery would define our modern concept of marriage. It is obvious that humans were designed to fall in love. In most human sexual interactions romance is involved. It is also obvious that God intended children to have fathers and mothers. But it should also be obvious to anyone studying the Bible, that God never gave humans the right to own other humans.

The concept of coveting another man’s material possessions, livestock, wives, and children had to be about more than just human sexuality.

The Hebrew word that is translated as adultery is na’aph. (Strong’s H5003) Na’aph is used throughout the Old Testament, and in quite a few instances obviously means to interact with the gods.

The only way to harmonize the two concepts expressed by these two commandments, would require thinking of the gods as somehow different. A race of beings that did not have the right to claim ownership of humanity. A race of beings that was somehow different.

Since the Ten Commandments were obviously not given to the gods, but to Moses and the Israelites. I knew that it would be difficult to prove what I am talking about.

Over time these commandments became understood as we understand them today, for a reason. One of the first verses alluding to covetousness and adultery seemingly is recorded at Genesis 6:1-4. It is these verses that lend the strongest support for the Serpent Seed teaching.

“And it came to pass, when humans began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh, yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.”

“There were nephilim in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became the mighty men which were of old, the men of renown.”

Although I had never fully understood these verses until I forced myself to sit down and examine each and every word, I always had a basic understanding that these nephilim were somehow involved in most of mankind’s problems prior to the flood of Noah’s day.

I also understood that those nephilim were born as a result of those sons of God having sex with women. And I was 100% right about that.

But having spent my entire life involved with human religions, I had acquired a few beliefs that were not at all correct.

For many many years, I knew in my heart, that those sons of God were powerful spirit beings who came down from heaven to have sexual relations with fleshly mortals. I had heard as much from several Protestants over the years, and had seen an artist rendering of the sons of God staring down from the clouds, at some very attractive young ladies, apparently planning their next move.

Back at that time, I never even thought about trying to research whether or not the religions of man knew what they were talking about. I simply accepted that they were sharing some spiritual truth that someone, somewhere, at some time, had discovered as they were researching these verses for themselves.

As much as I believed that these sons of God were some kind of spirit beings, I eventually had to admit that I was wrong.

Perhaps after Christ’s return we will come to understand so much that we will wonder how we could have ever been so ignorant. But even now, using nothing more than the Bible, we can know much more than those who are involved in religion.

In fact, a very important first step, that I always try to highlight, for people wanting to learn any spiritual truth, is just how essential it is to separate ourselves from whatever belief system we may currently be involved in.

Figuring out any ancient mystery while studying nothing more than the truth is difficult enough. Attempting to do so while at the same time allowing ourselves to be exposed to religious doctrine, would likely be impossible.

Job 2:1 says:

“There was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD and Satan also came to present himself before the LORD”

Just this short piece of text reveals quite a bit about who these sons of God were. First off, the fact the the phrase “sons of God” is plural means that there had to have been more than one.

But if we take into consideration that Satan came in with them, in order to present himself before the LORD, just as those sons of God had come in, to present themselves before the LORD, there is a pretty good possibility that Satan himself may have been one of those sons of God. Linguistically it would at least seem that this is a possibility. But maybe not. In the creation account Satan is called a serpent.

His title of serpent may have simply been figurative, however it equally possible that it may have been literal. I won’t be debating the physical nature of Satan, because I simply do not know. The serpent actually spoke to Eve. Had I ever witnessed a serpent speaking with a human, I would say that certainly Satan was a serpent. But, I have never seen such a thing. The conversation between Satan and Eve took place thousands of years before the languages were confused at the tower of Babel so there is the possibility that Satan was in fact a serpent.

This would be the same Satan that was in the Garden Of Eden with Adam and Eve, and the same Satan that was present when Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden of Eden.

To anybody reading this verse and other similar verses, these sons of God might seem to be spirits, likely the same spirit beings spoken of in other verses as angels. After all, many religions teach that these sons of God, in fact are spirits, and many accept this information as fact. After all, most of us would never suspect the churches of having any reason to lie about such a thing.

But since that information isn’t clearly spelled out in the Bible, we shouldn’t just take the Church’s at their word. All religions are made up of religious people. And religious people have a very bad reputation for being dishonest.

If we are willing to ignore the teachings of religion, and just concentrate on what is recorded in the Bible, we can get a much better understanding of just who these sons of God were.

If we look at every verse about a son of God, we should be able to at least get a basic understanding of what a son of God is, or what a son of God is not.

Jesus who was a fleshly man is often spoken of as the son of God. That doesn’t necessarily mean that all sons of God are fleshly beings, but at least we can confirm that a son of God doesn’t necessarily have to be some kind of invisible spirit creature. Another son of God that confirms that this is the case is Adam. At Luke 3:38 Adam is called the son of God.

Many religious people deny that Adam was a son of God in the same way that Jesus was a son of God, but linguistically the Bible speaks of Adam, Jesus, Those gathered before God in The Book Of Job, and the fathers of the nephilim, in exactly the same way.

Knowing that God’s word the Bible makes no distinction, indicates that as different as each of these sons of God may have been, they had to have shared some common traits. At the very least, we can know that each of them had the same father, in some unique way. That father being God.

There can be no denying that Jesus was obviously different from every other character in the Bible. Many if not all of Christianity’s conflicting sects recognize that Jesus’ roll makes him the focus of the Bible.

This obvious fact has led many of Christendom’s religions to adopt the doctrine that Jesus is in fact God Almighty himself. Many adherents of the cults of man can not accept that the title “Son Of God” can properly be assigned to anyone other than Jesus.

As obvious as it might be that the title “Son Of God” is not unique to Jesus, the religions of Christianity still attempt to make an artificial distinction, where one simply does not exist.

When speaking of Adam as an ancestor of Jesus, most English versions of Luke 3:38 say:

“the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God”.

In the original Greek, the actual words used here would translate literally as:

“of Enosh, of Seth, of Adam, of God”.

If you notice, in Hebrew, the word son is not actually present in this verse. The Churches teach that Adam was a sinner, and Jesus was not, so the official teaching of some churches highlight the missing word son at this verse as evidence to support that Adam would not qualify for the official title “Son of God”. In the same way that many religions try to say that Satan was not a son of God. As if, Satan had a different creator, or perhaps created himself.

This list runs all the way from verse 23 to 38, but it is all just part of a single thought. It is obvious that everyone on the list is the father of the previous person on the list.

This very long sentence begins by making the curious statement that people thought that Jesus was the son of Joseph. At this verse the word huios (Strong’s G5207) is used. Huios means child, and in context could be properly translated as son, due to the fact that Jesus was male. In other words technically verses 23 and 24 say that, Jesus was thought to be a child of Joseph, of Heli, of Metthat, etc.

Huios is the same Greek word that is used in the phrases “Son Of Man” and “Son Of God”. Meaning that as recorded in Greek, it would be more accurate to call Jesus “Child of Mankind” and “Child of God”.

Although it is obvious that the word huios (child) is not present anywhere, with the exception of the very first verse in this sentence, it is a well known fact that in Attic Greek, the word son would be understood at each use of the word “of” which is an accurate translation of the Greek word tou. (Strong’s G3588)

What is recorded in the Bible is reasonable. What is taught by religion is not. Other verses confirm that people would have likely thought that Joseph was Jesus’ father. After all, Jesus was born in Joseph’s house, to Mary, who was also a member of Joseph’s house.

Adam was created directly by God, so it should be obvious that Adam was a child of God.

Hopefully addressing the language used to describe Adam as a son of God, will mitigate much of the religious foolishness, that is normally directed towards me, whenever I make one of these videos.

It would only be logical to think of Adam as a fleshly being just like us. There is nothing to lead us to believe that Adam was some kind of invisible spirit creature. Jesus, at least during his time among mankind in the first century was also a fleshly being, although there is some debate about where he was and what form he was in prior to his birth, and what form he took after his resurrection.

Now we have to determine what kind of creatures the sons of God were at Genesis 6:4,5.

“The nephilim were on the Earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came into the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. They were the famous heroes of antiquity. And the LORD saw that humans were very wicked on the Earth. And every intention of mankind’s heart was only bad all of the time.”

When people say to me that the nephilim somehow survived the flood, or that the nephilim were giants, or that the nephilim were killed off when the sons of Israel entered the promised land, I usually just keep quite. People want details about things that they can not possibly understand without at least a basic understanding of what the Bible actually says.

Today is the day for making that basic understanding available to everyone.

In this video series, I will be revealing many things that the Churches have been successfully concealing for thousands of years. The information that I am sharing with you today, will include everything that a person needs to know about the nephilim. When you are finished listening to all of the information in this series, you will know more about the Bible, than has been known by anyone in at least the last 2,000 years.

I am reasonably sure that everything that we need to know is recorded in just Genesis 6:4,5.

The word that is rendered as nephilim, (nephiyl Strong’s H5303) actually means fellers. In our day men who cut down trees might be called fellers.

At Isaiah 14:8 the Bible says that after Satan is removed from the Earth, the trees will rejoice saying:

“Now that you are gone, no one comes to cut us down.”

It should be obvious to anyone reading this verse, that the cutting down of The Creators trees would have been enough of a sin, in and of itself, to cause our father to refer to those doing the cutting as wicked. According to this verse it was Satan that caused people to cut down trees, and once he is gone, the current practice of doing harm to God’s forest will cease forever.

I have heard religious doctrines that specifically state nephilim means fellers of men, in other words murderers.

Some Bible translations do not use the word nephilim at this verse, but instead render this word as giants. The religious belief that giants once roamed the Earth is so great, that anytime someone uploads a photoshopped picture of archaeologist unearthing a fossilized giant skeleton, it gets shared millions of times on social media as authentic.

There is no linguistic connection between the ancient Hebrew word translated as nephilim, and any ancient Hebrew word related to unusual height. That doesn’t mean that these nephilim, weren’t giants, it just means that there is no evidence for such a belief found in the Bible.

Simply put the Hebrew word nephiyl means feller. I think that the word nephilim could easily mean a feller of anything. Plant, animal, fish, bird, man, or tree.

After all, each of these living things belongs to God, just as the trees do. God entrusted mankind with the very special privileged of being responsible caretakers of his planet, and it should be obvious to any reasonable person, that mankind in general has betrayed that trust.

That being the case, it is more than possible that nephilim, or fellers is simply a title earned for causing the destruction of living things.

Some, reference materials state that the word nephiyl means fallen. In other words these nephilim did not cause others to fall, but instead fell themselves. Often it is implied that they fell from heaven, or fell from grace. But that seems very illogical when we take into consideration how the Hebrew language works.

At Isaiah 14:12 the bible uses the Hebrew word that means fallen:

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”

It is the ancient Hebrew word naphal (Strong’s H5037) that is translated as our English word fallen at this verse. Naphal appears in the ancient Hebrew text of the Bible a total of 434 times.

Naphal and nephyl are obviously very similar, which is what we would expect. But, they are also very different, especially as originally rendered in ancient Hebrew.

At each verse where the Hebrew word naphal is used the concept of the subject falling, or being fallen, or being cast down, or even submitting to a more powerful being is undeniable. But in every piece of text that includes the word nephiyl it is obvious that none of the persons is being accused of falling, but instead, of causing others to fall. In fact, even outside of the Bible the word nephiyl is only used to denote those who cause living things to fall.

As Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance brings out. In the Chaldean language, the word nephiyl has been found in ancient Babylonian text about the nephiyl, or giant in the sky. In particular, the giant that we today call Constellation Orion.

There is no ambiguity about the identity of Orion. Orion The Hunter is absolutely, without a doubt, the same individual that the Bible calls Nimrod The Hunter. It is pretty much universally accepted by every authority on the ancient past, that the two are one and the same.

Nimrod was born after the flood, his father was Cush, the natural son of Ham, who was obviously a human, his mother was a human, and yet according to external sources, he was memorialized for all posterity as the Nephilim Constellation.

Obviously constellation Orion is very large. But that does not mean that Orion the man, Also known as Nimrod, was any larger than his peers.

This constellation was not named after Orion because he fell, but because he caused others to fall.

It has been pointed out to me many times by my viewers that giants such as Goliath and Og were nephilim, but within the pages of the Bible there really is no linguistic connection whatsoever between such men and the word nephilim.

I am not saying that Goliath and Og were not fellers, but singling them out as such, would be unfair. Their reputations as great heroes of the ancient past, are fairly inconsequential when compared to other Bible characters, who were never described as unusually tall, such as Nimrod.

According to the Bible the very first King chosen by the nation of Israel was Saul. Saul was not chosen to be king by God, but according to the account God allowed Saul to be king because the Israelites demanded it. According to 1Samuel 9:1 Saul was every bit as tall as Goliath and Og.

“Kish had a son named Saul, a handsome young man. There was not a handsomer man found in all of Israel. From his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people.”

I am 6’3” which is rather tall, but not freakishly so. If we figure that quite a few people in Israel were probably the same height as myself, or likely much taller, and add another 12” to cover the extra height of Saul from his shoulders upwards,then Saul would have been at least 7’3” tall. I’m not making this up. 1Samuel 9:1 really is in the Bible. The description of Saul’s height means that he was likely as tall as Goliath and Og.

It should be obvious that Saul was likely chosen by the people, because of his height. Many today who are unusually tall, are admired for this very insignificant characteristic. Perhaps the surrounding nations all had unusually tall rulers. If that is the case, it is possible that those that are called nephilim in the Bible, were all very tall. But without any information recorded in our Bibles to confirm such a thing, we really wouldn’t want to put our faith in any such religious doctrine.

Those who believe that the nephilim survived the flood say that Numbers 13:33 clearly states that there were nephilim in the promised land long after the flood. But at Numbers 13:32 the verse just before that, the Bible says that the report about the nephilim was a lie. Most Bibles say that the report was evil, but the Hebrew word used is not the word meaning evil. It is dibbah (Strong’s H1681) which means lie.

Genesis 6:4 says that the nephilim were on the Earth in those days and also afterwards. Some argue that the nephilim were never done away with, while others say that they were done away with at the flood. Linguistically both could be correct. As worded this verse doesn’t definitively explain exactly what happened, nor does it define the length of time that would be understood by the words also after.

Some English translations of the Bible, incorporate the thought of the nephilim’s time on the Earth being limited, into their literal translations. The New Living Translation says that the nephilim were “in those days and for some time afterwards”. The International Standard Version says “The Nephilim were on the Earth at that time (and also immediately afterward)”. The God’s Word Translation says that the nephilim were on the Earth in those days and also later.

I’m only telling you this so that you can understand that there is some debate among translators as to the precise length of time indicated by the original wording.

I have spent a great deal of time looking at this verse as recorded in Hebrew, but as much as I would like to say conclusively just how long the nephilim continued to live after the days of Noah, I really can’t. Linguistically this verse doesn’t seem to reveal that information.

I believe that much of the disagreement concerning the length of time that the nephilim existed on the Earth is probably based on the fact that if we acknowledge that the nephilim are still here, then we have to somehow identify just who they are.

Since all Bible translators are certified directly by the state through the University system of degrees, and work directly for the religions of the Empire, they are not likely to produce anything that would implicate their leaders as being directly involved in the wicked acts that the nephilim are accused of. After all, if it was revealed that the nephilim Nimrod was nothing more than a political leader who led his men into combat, it would have to be acknowledged that all political leaders of nations with armies are Nephilim.

Perhaps God had this information recorded in this way so that we could form our own opinions.

According to this passage, as originally recorded, the nephilim could have continued on the Earth all the way up until they were killed at the flood. This is a doctrinal belief of some religions.

Others believe that they lived all the way up until the nation of Israel eradicated them. Some even believe that the nephilim are still alive and among us to this day. Linguistically, the length of time indicated by the scriptures could indeed have extended beyond the deluge of Noah’s day.

If the nephilim continued to live after the flood, the Babylonian belief that Nimrod was a nephilim, may be accuarate. Even the claims of the spies sent out by Moses, may have been correct. The Bible calls those spies liars, but it doesn’t actually tell us which part of their report was the lie.

We are going to have to go much deeper than the cults of Christianity and Judaism, if we want to come to an accurate understanding of what is meant by the wording of these verses.

Calling the nephilim famous heroes is more accurate than calling them men of renown, or famous men of old, as most English translations of the Bible traditionally do. The word enowsh (Strong’s H582) might be better translated in some other way. According to most Hebrew reference materials the word can only mean human men, but that is not how the word is used in the Bible.

At Genesis 19:1, the Bible says that two angels visited Lot in Sodom. At Genesis 18:2 these same angels are called enowsh. If we read further in the account, we are told that the men of Sodom surrounded Lot’s house in an attempt to abduct these angles. This is found at Genesis 19:4, but this time it is the men surrounding the house that are called enowsh.

If in this one account both men and angels are called enowsh, then obviously enowsh can not simply mean male humans, at least not as we currently think of angels. It is possible that both the men and the angels in this account are biologically humans, in a fleshly form.

If we refuse to believe that angels can exist in fleshly form, then it is likely that we have been trained to do so by religion. Religion as we know it, is any belief system that people subscribe too that is not supported by provable facts.

Nowhere in this account does the Bible specifically say that these angels were some kind of spirit creatures. Previously these same angels had met with Abraham and eaten food, which is another good indication that these angels were in fact fleshly beings.

There really are not any scriptures that I can think of that clearly define what an enowsh is. Many verses about enowsh are obviously about named men, so we can know for a fact that an enowsh can be a man, but that doesn’t mean that a woman can not also be an enowsh.

Just like the teaching that this word can only pertain to humans, the teaching that enowsh can only be male may be false as well.

There is a word that can only be used to describe women, which is never used to describe men that is formed from the word enowsh.

That word is ishshah (Strong’s H802). According to the teachings of religion this word means wife, and is made up of the two words iysh which we are told means man, and enowsh which we are also told means man.

The ancient Hebrew language is usually very logical. So we need to understand that something is not quite right with the current understanding of what this word means. There would be no logical connection between our modern concept of a wife, and two Hebrew words both meaning man. It simply does not make sense to define a wife as a man man.

I have posted many videos explaining that the word iysh has no English equivalent. Because it describes a position in society that is no longer part of our current social order.

Iysh means male tribal leader. Enowsh means leader. Iyshsha can only mean leader of the male tribal leader.

In other words, throughout the Old Testament, the word tribal leader is never used when speaking of a woman, because women are always referred to specifically as leaders of the male tribal leaders. The word ishshah is used throughout the Hebrew portion of the Bible.

The Hebrew title of iyshsha is always assigned to women who were the sexual partners of very powerful men. In our culture the wives of powerful rulers might be thought of as iyshsha.

But the word iyshsha can not simply be translated as wife due to the fact that many men in our day, who are married to wives, would not be considered powerful according to Bible standards.

But since very few people still live by tribal law, it could be said that every housewife is an iyshsha, a leader of a male tribal leader.

Another point that I think needs to be brought out is that the word enowsh which means leader is the root of the word anash (Strong’s H605). Anash means incurably sick.

Hidden in the Bible account of the fall of mankind, there is a very direct connection between the words enowsh meaning leader and anash meaning terminally ill, which is brought out at Romans 5:12:

“Sin came into the world through one human, and death through that sin, hence, death spread to all humans because all sinned.”

If you look at this verse in any English version of the Bible, you will not see the word human, but the words man, and men. Once again translation errors are to blame.

Many verses in the Bible similar to this verse seem to be about Adam bringing sin into the world, however there are also verses like this, that are very obviously about Eve bringing sin into the world. And there can be no denying that there are other verses about Satan bringing sin into the world.

The actual word that is used here is the Greek word anthropous. Anthropous is where we get our English word anthropology, which means the study of humans, not the study of male humans.

Mankind was promised by God that if obedient to his command to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and bad, we would live forever.

Satan told Eve that God was lying, and that she would live forever, weather she ate of the fruit of the tree or not. But Satan also promised Eve that she could be like the gods. In other words a leader.

But it was not God that was lying. As John 8:44 brings out, Satan was lying. Because as soon as Eve ate from the fruit she became terminally ill, just as God had said. The fact that Eve is no longer among the living, proves that what I am telling you is true. The moment that Eve ate of the fruit, she became both enowsh, a leader, and anash, terminally ill. The same could also be said about humanity in general. For a fact, according to the Bible, the root cause of human mortality is the perverted desire to be like gods.

In trying to determine if the Sons of the true God were indeed spirit creatures, or actually fleshly beings, just like ourselves, I diligently searched the scriptures for any passage that seemed to support the possibility that the sons of God were in fact some kind of beings that existed in the spirit realm. But I was unable to positively identify a single verse that seemed to support such a notion.

Nowhere in the Bible are the word angel and the phrase “son of God” used to describe the same individual. However, as I said earlier, the phrase “son of God” is used to describe both Adam, as a fleshly human being, and Jesus when he was alive on the Earth as a fleshly human being.

Since Satan and Adam, who are both spoken of in the Bible as living within the Garden of Eden, at the same time, it is only logical to conclude, that each and every person spoken of as a son of God in the Bible was a created being, made by God, without fleshly parents.

At Genesis 6:2 The phrase sons of God as written in ancient Hebrew, is plural, meaning more than one.

Job 2:1 reveals that the sons of God (plural) came to present themselves before God, which once again means more than one son of God would have been present, and then it says that Satan came in among them, meaning that his presence would be added to those who would already be there.

We cannot simply assume that Satan himself was a son of God, based on the fact that he entered in among the sons of God. But perhaps he was. Similarly, we can’t simply assume that there were more than two sons of God. Sons being plural simply means that there were more than one. But we do have to at least acknowledge that there were possibly more than two sons of God present, and that Satan himself may have been a son of God.

Up to this point, this entire video has been devoted to explaining some essential background information that is going to be useful in determining just who the nephilim are. But if we simply go back and read the verses that are specifically about the nephilim, we may possibly be able to figure out who they are without having to do any additional research at all.

Genesis 6:1 says:

“When human beings began to reproduce”

There is no confusion about what this means. Human beings had children. This is not about spirit creatures having children, it is specifically stated that these children were humans, born of humans.

As worded in English there is some confusion, about who had who, but that is easily cleared up simply by examining the original language text. According to our English language Bibles, “Men had daughters”. But a more appropriate understanding of this verse would be, “Men and women began to multiply”.

The excuse that translators use in explaining their rendering is based on the word that is translated as daughters of men. The Hebrew word bath (Strong’s H1323) is made up of the two words banah (Strong’s H1129) which means built. And ben (Strong’s H1121) which means sons. In other words the phrase, daughters of men, would be more accurately translated as beings built from the sons.

If you think about it, this is a very good description of Eve. According to the creation account, Adam, the son of god, was created from the dust, and Eve was created from Adam. In effect Eve was “built” from Adam.

Since Eve was made from Adam’s rib, it could be said that she was Adam’s daughter. But since both were created by God, a more appropriate way of thinking of Adam and Eve would be as brother and sister.

Within the pages of the Bible, the concept of brothers and sisters reproducing offspring is not unique to Adam and Eve.

Since Adam and eve would have been biologically similar, it would not be wrong to think of them as clones. But since they were of different genders, probably a better way to describe them would to be as twins.

In our day when close relatives reproduce, there is an increased risk of certain kinds of problems due to the fact that if both parents carry a genetic defect, it is more likely that their offspring will be affected by that defect.

But far from absolute, many brothers and sisters, over the course of history have reproduced healthy offspring. This even happens from time to time in our day. The only reason that I am mentioning this, is because it is a common misconception that as brother and sister, Adam and Eve could not have reproduced healthy children together.

Since all of the sons of God would have been genetically perfect without any defects at all, any offspring resulting from a mating of Adam and Eve would themselves have been perfect. Had Adam and Eve’s offspring remained faithful to their race, every single descendant of theirs would likely, to this day, look exactly like Adam and Eve.

Another very logical line of reasoning that can not be denied is the fact that those daughters of man. Those beings built out of the sons of God, as spoken of at Genesis 6:1 are spoken of in the plural.

If each of those sons of god was genetically distinct from one another, but Adam was genetically identical to Eve, Eve having been created from his rib, we would expect that those other women would have been created in a similar way. In other words each of the sons of God might have had a mate created from their ribs.

I know that none of this is recorded in the Bible, but we have to recognize that there is no other explanation as to who these multiple sons of God were, and that there is no other explanation as to who these multiple women built out of men would have been.

Another reason that we can believe that there were multiple races of man created and placed in the garden, is that the story of creation, which is very limited, starts to make perfect sense once we compare what we know about creation with other stories containing similar details that are recorded in our Bibles.

The two commandments of not to covet your neighbors wife, as translated into English, combined with the commandment not to commit adultery, as translated into English, would quite accurately describe any sex act between Satan and Eve, when combined with the covenant to break God’s law, that Satan and Eve entered into when they shared fruit from the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Bad”. But as we are going to find out, that belief does not have the support of the Bible when taken as a whole.

Some may believe, and rightfully so that God’s commands still stand to this day. To many people reading the verses involving the nephilim, which many believe involves the mixing of angels and humans, or the mixing of the races, is closely associated with much of the suffering that mankind has endured over the centuries.

I posted a video not too long ago about what the ten commandments are actually about, and how none of those commandments can be followed in our day due to the changes that have taken place on the Earth, as well as in our solar system.

Very obviously in our day, any commandments that people may imagine to be associated with the mixing of the races would be impossible to observe.

No area of the Earth is currently inhabited by people that are identical in appearance. Each and every one of us is different from each and every other one of us, with the exception of those who just happen to be identical twins. But even in identical twins there are significant differences.

No matter how much time you devote to the study of the scriptures, you will never find any indication that God has a special love for any particular nation, race, skin color, or blood type. Obviously something else has to be involved.

In the first century when Jesus was here on the Earth, in the flesh, he said things that seemingly fit in very well with the Serpent Seed doctrine. At Matthew 23:33 Jesus accused the teachers of the law and the Pharisees, of being descendants of Satan.

“You Snakes! You children of the serpent! How do you plan on avoiding the judgment of Gehenna?”

Jesus was very clearly associating those religious leaders with the serpent seed. However, nowhere in the Bible are we given any information that would help us to identify any kind of genetic trait that Jesus would have used to help him to determine that those pharisees descended from Satan.

If those Pharisees shared some kind of character trait such as blood type, or a similar skin color, we will probably never know. Using every bit of information that is recorded in the Bible, we can’t even determine what color Jesus was. And contrary to what some religions teach we certainly will never be able to determine his blood type.

With every bit of information that is at our disposal we can get a basic understanding of just who those nephilim were that seemingly caused all of our problems.

Those nephilim are us. Kind of.

Lets look at the verses that tell us about the nephilim one more time, as found at Genesis 6:1-4.

“And it came to pass, when humans began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh, yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.”

“There were nephilim in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became the mighty men which were of old, the men of renown.”

Obviously the time when humans began to multiply would have been shortly after humans were created. Linguistically there isn’t really any indication that the title of nephilim was limited to the offspring of those sons of God. The Hebrew word Nephelim simply means fellers.

Since those sons of God were alive when men began to make a name for themselves as fellers, even the sons of God would have qualified as nephilim if they caused any of God’s plants, animals, fish, birds, trees, or fellow human beings to die.

Since the word nephilim in this verse is associated with those who had a well know reputation for killing living things, we can assume that this title as used in this verse was only being applied to those that were involved in the felling or killing of living things.

In the Bible Satan himself could be one of those accused of being a nephilim. John8:44 says:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of the institution of lying.”

It could be said that Satan was a murderer because he caused Eve to loose her life, and by default all of us as well. But, we don’t know everything about Satan.

It is possible that while in fleshly form, he eventually led military campaigns in his lust for power, directly engaging in carnal warfare, taking many human lives with his own hands.

Cain himself may have been considered by God to be a nephilim for the act of killing his brother.

According to the serpent seed doctrine the reason that Cain killed his brother was because Satan was Cain’s biological father. Initially I dismissed this teaching as utter nonsense. After all, I had always been told that Cain and Able were brothers, having the same father and mother.

But after discovering that much of what I had learned from religion over the course of my lifetime, was a lie, I felt that it would be best if I researched the passages dealing with the circumstances surrounding the birth of Cain and Abel thoroughly before declaring the “Serpent Seed Doctrine” to be untrue.

The account of Cain’s conception can be found at Genesis 4:1,2.

“Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of Yahweh.” And again, she bore his brother Abel.”

Linguistically this verse seems to explain in no uncertain terms that Cain’s birth resulted from Adam, knowing Eve. But since the Serpent Seed people refuse to acknowledge that this verse is about intercourse, I felt that I had to at least listen to why they might feel this way.

The word translated as knew, is yada (Strong’s H3045). Yada is properly translated as knew. In other words, this word is not specifically about sexual intimacy, but can be used just as our English words “know” and “knew” are used.

At Genesis 6:4 the word that is used to describe the sex acts between the nephilim and the daughters of men, is bow (Strong’s H935) which would be accurately translated as “came unto”, or “entered in” at this verse.

But this word, just like the word yada is not limited in it’s use to describing only sexual intimacy. Just a few verses later, At Genesis 6:20 God tells Noah:

“Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive.”

At this verse the word bow is rendered as come unto thee.

Yada, the word that is translated as knew at Genesis 4:1 can be used to describe many things having nothing to do with human reproduction, but there is no denying that it is repeatedly used throughout the Bible as a way of telling us who the biological father was of who.

Just a few verses after the account of Cain’s conception and birth, at Genesis 4:17 the bible records the birth of Cain’s son Enoch.

“Cain made love to his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch. Cain was then building a city, and he named it after his son Enoch”

At this verse the word yada is rendered as made love. Several English translations render this word in this way in both verses that I am discussing.

I have no agenda, hence, I would not choose to render this word in this way, even though I believe that doing so communicates exactly what the word yada means at this verse.

Another verse that confirms that the biological father of Cain was Abel is the description of the birth of his brother Seth who eventually became an ancestor of Jesus.

At Genesis 4:25 we are told:

“And Adam knew his wife again, and she bore another son and called his name Seth, for as she said, God has appointed for me another offspring instead of Abel, because Cain killed him.”

If we look at Genesis 4:1 again, the word that is translated as “and she conceived” is watahar (Strong’s H2029). This word isn’t just using the word “and” as if it is transitioning into a separate thought. As originally recorded the word watahar is specifically pointing to Adam’s knowing Eve and the cause of Cain’s conception. There isn’t any room for any alternate understanding of how Cain’s conception came about. As originally rendered in ancient Hebrew, only Adam could be the biological father of Cain.

Even though genetic traits such as skin color, blood type, and height, are chosen for us, traits such as wickedness, and righteousness are often spoken of in the Bible as the result of personal choice.

It must also be acknowledged that according to the Bible we all descended from the sons of God, and the women built from those sons of God. In other words even though we all have only one biological father and one biological mother, we all have many thousands of biological ancestors.

In effect each and every one of us has descended from Adam, and any other sons of God that happened to have been in the Garden of Eden. Including any wicked sons of God. It could be said that we inherited the characteristics of righteousness or wickedness from both. However it could be argued that like skin color and blood type, we don’t get to chose what kind of person we are. And there may in fact be some truth to that. But there is more recorded here that makes that seem unlikely.

At 1John 3:12 the relationship between Satan and Cain is explained in greater detail.

“Let us not be like Cain, who belonged to the wicked one, and slew his brother. And why slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s works were righteous.”

According to this verse,it was not a biological inherited character trait that caused Cain to become wicked. It was a choice. The verse does not say that Cain was just like his father Satan, but that he belonged to Satan.

According to the Ten Commandments we are to “honor our father and mother”. Cain obviously did not kill because he was the biological son of Adam. Cain learned to be a murderer likely, from the only recognized murder that is spoken of as being alive on the Earth at the time. Satan.

Obviously Eve was not the daughter of Satan. She was created by God from one of Adam’s ribs, and yet she chose to join Satan in his rebellion against God. Many feel that it would be unfair to judge Eve for her actions, and the Bible agrees, somewhat.

As a result of her rebellion, she eventually died, so did Adam and all of their children. According to Romans 6:23 that was their punishment for their sins.

“The wage that we are paid for sinning, is death”

Eve was told that if she sinned she would die. God’s word came true when Eve eventually died, therefore she has received her punishment in full.

But unlike the gods of punishment and reward that are worshiped by those who practice religion, The True God does not falsely claim to be forgiving. According to Acts 24:15 our God, the True God, really is forgiving.

“I have the same hope in God that they themselves cherish, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.”

Once I was able to clearly see from the Bible account, that the nephilim were nothing more than humans with a reputation for violence, I had to try to determine if this phrase would be applied to all of mankind, or just to those with an exceptional reputation for killing living things.

After all we could all be called nephilim if all that is required is the killing of plants, animals, fish, birds, people, or trees.

In the beginning Adam was only given permission to eat the fruit, and leaves of trees. Not the trees themselves.

Such a diet would not lead to the death of anything. Many have chosen to live as close to that law as possible by only consuming vegetables. But with the advent of agriculture, even vegetarians are limited by the laws of civilization as given to man by Satan. Agriculture is nothing like what mankind would have eaten in The Garden of Eden.

Without the destruction of God’s forest agriculture would not be possible. Billions of acres of God’s planet have been destroyed in Satan’s quest for world domination. And that destruction continues to this day.

Plants, animals, birds, fish, trees, and even human beings die every minute of every day due to the process of converting this planet into agricultural projects.

Many greedily assist Satan and his demons, by fully devoting themselves to the expansion and preservation of his civilization.

Even thought it is undeniable that the word Nephilim, means fellers, and that the word fellers simlply means murderers. I believe that the verse is specifically about a certain type of murderer. Calling these Nephilim ‘the mighty men which were of old, the men of renown.” Indicates that they stood out, and in fact unlike common murderers, were admired for the killing that they were involved in. So much so, that they were considered to be heroes.

In our day, just as in the ancient past, the only murderers that are admired as heroes would be members of the world’s armed forces.

The Bible does not require that we take a stand against these sons of the serpent. Using nothing more than common sense, anyone can see for themselves that struggling against Civilization, by involving ourselves in the political process, carnal warfare, or judicial actions has never once had any effect whatsoever on slowing down mankind’s destruction of our father’s children.

We do not want to fall into the same trap that Eve fell into when Satan offered her the opportunity to improve her situation by making herself like a god.

God does not require us to attempt to elect leaders, that we feel may enact better laws designed to save the forest. God does not expect us to try to figure out, which agricultural products are produced in a sustainable manner. God does not even require us to plant a tree.

When Adam and Eve were created, they were placed in a garden that had already been planted, and very soon we too will find ourselves in such surroundings.

The last thing that we think about as we drift off to sleep every night, should somehow relate to how terrible civilization is, or how wonderful life is going to be once civilization is done away with forever.

The wicked never think about such things. They are so obsessed with their own selfish desires, that they never think about much more than dominating others that do not have the same religious beliefs that they have. People that do not have the same color of skin. People that live on the other side of some imaginary line.

Selfish people can’t even get along with those who are the same religion, same color, or citizens of the same nation.

Very soon all of the worlds military personnel, as well as the mindless, selfish, fools that admire them, will be exposed for what they truly are, Cowards. Revelation 6:15 puts it this way:

“ And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and their mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains.”

Throughout the Bible stories about family lineage often involve disputes between children by birth and children by adoption. Jesus himself was considered to be a child of Joseph, even though we know for a fact that he was really a child of God.

Biologically, we are all children of the sons of God. However The Bible holds out the promise that we can all one day be adopted as Children of God.

The Greek word huiothesia (Strong’s G5206) translates as our English word adoption, and occurs 5 times in the New Testament. Ephesians 1:5 uses the word adoption this way:

“He predestined us to be adopted through Jesus Christ for Himself, according to His favor and will.”

Nearly everything that we can learn about Adam, Satan,the nephilim, Noah, Noah’s sons, Abraham, Melchizedek, and Jesus usually relates to lineage.

However, since we have all descended from the same God, and since each and every one of us is unique, we can not logically conclude that everyone who is wicked has the same color of skin, or belongs to the same religion, or lives in the same country, or shares a similar blood type.

There are many stories from many cultures involving beings called gods, with extraordinary powers. The Bible itself contains many similar stories. Even Jesus exhibited such powers. He was able to heal the sick, raise the dead, miraculously feed thousands of people, and even walk on water. When asked about his extraordinary abilities by a man named Nicodemus, Jesus replied in a way that revealed a sacred secret that the churches have been concealing for thousands of years. I’ll be revealing this secret as this series progresses. In fact before this series concludes I promise that I will be revealing many sacred secrets.

The small amount of time that you will need to invest in watching this series from beginning to end will be well worth it.

Events are about to start taking place that are going to require you to make some very important decisions. You don’t want to be faced with those decisions unprepared. All of the propaganda being promoted by The Empire is poison. No political decision will ever lead to you, or anyone else ever acquiring everlasting life.

If you don’t want to survive, don’t listen to me.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments